A guy called Gautama Buddha Sidharta made statements which as largely suppositions of what 'might be', were accepted as wisdom. There you have it - a religion! Hmm.
Historical foundation based on facts or History? - Zero. Hmm.
Hinduism is based on revelations to ostensibly great sages made in the Vedas and Upanishads. Historical base? - Zero. Hmm.
Confucianism were statements of alleged wisdom by a Chinese dude called Confucius. Not strictly a religion - this was a philosophical path to follow.
A real chap? - Definitely but Historical base and facts are noticeable by their absence. Hmm.
Judeo-Christianity is based entirely on History - and pretty good History, at that. The trouble is that so many atheists and lazy agnostics cannot be bothered to research to see just how good it actually is. Testimonies, real figures, sworn declarations, tangible events, archaeological support et al - no honest observer can simply brush these things aside.
