Friday, December 02, 2016

Frank Field MP On Paul Nuttall.


Nuttall could help Ukip take string of seats from Jeremy Corbyn’s party in the north of England, says senior Labour MP

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/30/ukip-leader-paul-nuttall-is-game-changer-for-labour-says-frank-field#img-1
 Frank Field said Nuttall ‘will appear to many voters as a man who is “on the right page at the right time”’

The new Ukip leader, Paul Nuttall, is a “game changer” for Labour and could realistically oust a string of MPs in the north of England, Frank Field, the Labour former minister, has said.
Field, the MP for Birkenhead and chair of the House of Commons work and pensions committee, said Labour needed an urgent strategy to deal with Nuttall’s succession to the Ukip leadership, as he will appear to many voters as a man who is “on the right page at the right time”.


Nuttall, a former history lecturer from Bootle, Merseyside, has rightwing views on crime and immigration without predecessor Nigel Farage’s background as a privately educated London commodities broker.
“Farage picked up a million Labour votes by accident but with this guy it is all he’s going after,” Field said. “It is about culture, identity and family and so on. The party centrally hasn’t got a clue. There are one or two people taking about it but whether they seriously realise what is coming is another matter.”
To those in Labour who say Nuttall poses a similar threat to Farage, Field said they “couldn’t be more wrong – it is game changing to Labour”.
“Ukip under Paul will become the English party,” he said. “I don’t think it will be a wipeout on the scale of the SNP but I do think they will be taking Labour people out in our northern heartlands.


“Last time, Ukip gave seats to the Tories. This time they will take
some themselves. If we say it will be the same as [Ukip under] Farage, we have lost the plot.”
It is understood Labour plans to fight Ukip under Nuttall by attacking his record on wanting to privatise the NHS. Labour leadership sources said the strategy would be to relentlessly highlight Nuttall’s past praise for privatisation, which he has now disavowed.



Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%

Mute
Pinterest
Paul Nuttall replaces Nigel Farage as Ukip leader

Immediately after Nuttall’s election, dozens of Labour MPs tweeted a video showing Nuttall criticising the “monolithic” NHS and suggesting it could not survive in its current form.
However, Field, who has long held that Ukip is a threat to Labour and campaigned for the UK to leave the EU, said the NHS strategy would be “water off a duck’s back”.
“Labour voters aren’t interested in this kind of old politics. They will want someone speaking centrally about themselves,” he said. “We might try to pin this on him but he’s denounced it himself.”
The Labour leadership is understood to be treating the threat of Ukip under Nuttall seriously but does not consider it to be an escalation of risk compared with the party under Farage.
While Labour will want to keep the attention on health, Ukip and the Conservatives are likely to try to move the conversation on to immigration, attacking the party for not wanting to have extra controls.
But Diane Abbott, the shadow home secretary, has been clear that Labour must “hold the line” by defending immigration and not allowing the party to become “Ukip-lite”.
Stephen Kinnock, Labour MP for Aberavon, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday that the threat of Ukip “must always be treated seriously” as he argued the party had made a mistake in allowing “nationalist and populist voices” to dictate the immigration debate. Guardian.

Bonkers Boris: Amnesty? - No, Nay, Never!



Boris Johnson calls for illegal immigrants to be granted amnesty after Brexit.


Boris Johnson, U.K. foreign secretaryBoris Johnson, U.K. foreign secretary CREDIT: CHRIS RATCLIFFE/BLOOMBERG
Boris Johnson has called for illegal immigrants to be granted the right to stay in Britain after Brexit, according to reports.
The Foreign Secretary has suggested that offering amnesty to those who have avoided detection for 10 years would be economically beneficial. 
The idea which was raised at a meeting in Number 10 has been described as "insane" by one minister present.
No person should EVER benefit from illegal behaviour!
Mr Johnson first argued for an amnesty in 2008 and he repeated the politically controversial idea during his time as Mayor of London.
He raised the issue again during the referendum campaign and argued that offering amnesty would be “the humane thing to do.”
One senior minister told the Sun: “It’s an insane idea and would make ordinary Brits furious.




“A lot of us round the table couldn’t believe Boris is still going on about this. Privately, Boris is still the most pro-immigration member of the Cabinet.”
Theresa May ruled out the introduction of amnesties during her time as Home Secretary, claiming it would send out “the wrong message”.
A spokesman for Mr Johnson said: “Boris reiterated what he has said publicly before about amnesties, including during the EU referendum campaign.
Nobody must EVER profit from any illegal action - whether small or large. See what Peter Whittle AM had to say:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/738930/peter-whittle-blasts-boris-johnson-over-free-movement-claims

Justin Welby: Well Said!

November 23rd, 2016 | Islam
Justin Welby, The Archbisop of Canterbury with a moderate record since taking office, has called for people to stop saying that ISIS has "nothing to do with Islam". 

Birdie.


Christian Legal Centre: Nice One!

http://www.christianconcern.com/print/our-concerns/adoption/council-to-reconsider-christian-couples-adoption-offerA council will reconsider a Christian couple’s offer to adopt their foster children, following involvement from the Christian Legal Centre.
The couple were initially told they could not adopt the children, because of their "concerning" views about same-sex parenting. 
But the local council this week recognised that the initial rejection was wrong and agreed to reconsider its assessment. The couple will now be assessed by someone outside the council.
 

Children's best interests

The couple has been providing foster care to two young children since early this year. Reports from social workers praised them for their "lovely care", and stated that they "worked well with all professionals".  
As Christians, the parents believe that a child's best interests are served by having 'a mum and a dad' wherever possible.
When a social worker told them that a same-sex couple were being considered as adoptive parents for the children, the couple expressed surprise and concern. They then reiterated their offer to adopt the children themselves, arguing that this would be the "best option for them and their emotional well-being"
But the council rejected their offer to adopt, saying that their views on same-sex parenting were "concerning" and "could be detrimental to the long term needs of the children."
 

'We are a loving, caring and stable family'

In the parents’ letter to the council, requesting that they review their decision, they stated:
"We are Christians and we expressed the view that a child needs a mother and a father. We expressed our views in modest, temperate terms based on our Christian convictions.  We love everyone (regardless of sexual orientation) and we love the children and believe that they would benefit from the foundation offered by a mother and a father. 
"The decision appears discriminatory to us and not related to the children’s needs. The children love us: we love them. All the reports show that we are a loving, caring and stable family. What more could a child need?"
 

'Significant step forward'

The Christian Legal Centre is supporting the couple and has been working with them and the council to resolve the situation. 
The council's recognition that the initial decision was wrong and agreement to reconsider the couple's application is a significant step forward.
 

'Still a long way to go'

After the council initially rejected the couple’s offer to adopt, Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said:
"This couple's viewpoint is lawful and mainstream. The expression of a view that a child needs a mother and a father cannot justify a refusal to even consider a married couple’s application to adopt. The separation of this couple from the children at this time is unthinkable."
Commenting on the new development, she said: 
"We are encouraged by the progress made this week, and grateful that the council has recognised its mistake and adopted a more appropriate stance. It is a step in the right direction.
"These developments highlight the value of Christians standing together, and where appropriate exposing the challenges that people are facing.
"There is still a long way to go, and we will continue to stand with this couple. Please pray with us that these young children are able to stay with them." 
 

Please continue to pray

Please give thanks with us for this encouraging development and pray that the couple will be able to adopt the children in their care.
 

Great Advice From The Psalmist.


Deserving/Undeserving Poor: An Article Well Worth The Reading.

Thursday, December 01, 2016

Prayer Corner.

Please pray for my friend Irene from Church. She is 96 and has just had a very bad fall.
Her speech is slurred and she appears to have developed a nasty infection.
Please too, pray for: Paul, Sue, Zebbie, Ged, TJ, Marie, Angela, Debbie, Neil - all with assorted health problems. Thanks.

NHS: More Staff Needed At The Sharp End.

Only one in four NHS trusts are confident they have the right staffing numbers to deliver quality healthcare.

Petition To PM Of Pakistan.


Less than one week after the Easter Sunday killing of over 70 people, mostly Christians, in Lahore, the government of Pakistan again showed itself to be weak in the face of protests by Islamists angry at the execution of political assassin Mumtaz Qadri.
Initial promises to crack down on extremists now seem a long way off as the government gave in to seven of the ten demands made by protesters in Islamabad, including a promise not to make any amendments to the extremely controversial and widely misused blasphemy laws.
Of great concern is the government’s accession to one of the demands to ‘show no leniency’ to anyone convicted of blasphemy. This, alongside the protesters calling for her execution, puts Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who has been on death row for blasphemy since 2010, in a very grave position.
As well as demanding no amendments to the blasphemy law and no leniency for those convicted under it, they have been specifically demanding Asia Bibi’s execution.
The voices of those who oppose the blasphemy laws are silenced through violence. Punjab Governor Salman Taseer and Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti were both assassinated after speaking out against the blasphemy laws and in support of Asia Bibi.
Release International first ran a campaign for the repeal of the blasphemy laws in Pakistan in 2011.
Today we are renewing our call for the government of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to act with courage and humanity and abolish these iniquitous laws for the good of all Pakistanis.
The Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS) in Islamabad states in its report “Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan - A Historical Overview”, that since 1990, as well as those convicted through the courts, “52 people have been extra-judicially murdered, for being implicated in blasphemy charges”.
Will you add your voice to our campaign to see this unjust, misused law finally repealed?
Please sign and share the petition below so that we can together raise our concerns on behalf of those who suffer such great injustice.
Release Int.
To Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif
We strongly urge the Government of Pakistan to repeal the nation’s blasphemy laws, most notably section 295c which carries a mandatory death sentence. These laws, which are frequently misused and foster religious intolerance, are incompatible with Pakistan’s aspiration of being a modern, democratic, Islamic state respected by the international community.
We would encourage you when considering this to listen afresh to the words of Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his first Presidential Address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan (August 11, 1947), where he stated “You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed - that has nothing to do with the business of the State”.
This petition will be delivered to:
  • Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister, Pakistan

Serious Crime Soars in Just Five Years. Treat Criminals With Kid Gloves And ...

.

Crime as judged by the severity score is up by almost 17 per cent in the UK since 2010-11. Mail.

Easy To Promise: Harder To Deliver.

Theresa May (pictured), a vicar's daughter and regular churchgoer, told MPs that Britain should be proud of its Christian heritage and people should be able to speak openly about their faith. Mail.

I Always Enjoy An Upper Back Massage, Too.

Community Penalties Are Derisory In The UK - I've Been In Legal The System And I KNOW!

Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, the most senior judge in England and Wales, said that community punishments given to more than 100,000 serious offenders each year are 'a problem'. Mail.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3988492/Community-service-sentences-tougher-says-Britain-s-senior-judge-offenders-think-got-off.html

I Saw One Of These Fellers Yesterday.

That really made my day!

Brexit: Clean Break Needed.

Angela Merkel's refusal to let Britain win a good Brexit will boost the case for a quick, clean break from the EU

The Very Essence of The Christian Faith.

Readers Are Obviously Liking This Blog!

I wonder if adding cricket reports is why this Blog has doubled its readership in the last three months?
Many thanks for coming to this site. May I suggest that you offer like-minded friends and relatives the opportunity to visit as well, by telling them how to locate this bastion of common sense.

Envy.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXFbVe_7Kt4