Monday, May 11, 2026

Pastor in Mexico.

Pastor in Mexico jailed, expelled for refusing to participate in Catholic ritual.

  • 26 Jan, 2026 13:06 EST

    Officials in a village in southern Mexico’s Oaxaca state detained for five days and then expelled a Protestant pastor for refusing to participate in Catholic church rituals, according to a U.K-based advocacy group. CD.

Philemon 1:4.

Birdies.


 

A Scripture From Luke 7 Which I Adore.

20) When the men came to Jesus, they said, “John the Baptist sent us to you to ask, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?’”

21) At that very time Jesus cured many who had diseases, sicknesses and evil spirits, and gave sight to many who were blind. 22) So he replied to the messengers, “Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy.

are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor. 23) Blessed is anyone who does not stumble on account of me.”

PERSECUTION TRENDS 2026.

 

PERSECUTION TRENDS 2026.

Posted: 30th December 2025

Persecuted Trends Report Image 2

As the gospel spreads and impacts more lives, Christians around the world are bracing themselves for a year of increased persecution at the hands of oppressive governments and religious extremists.

Release International’s annual Persecution Trends Report spotlights a number of places in the world where severe persecution is likely to increase in the year ahead.

The report provides a platform for Release International’s partners to analyse the current situation in their country and to say what they think 2026 could hold in store for followers of Christ.

In Nigeria one of Release International’s partners says the martyrdom of Christians could double without swift action. In China Release International’s partner believes persecution it at its worst level since the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s and early 1970s.

The report appears in the January edition of Release International’s free quarterly magazine, Voice. It can also be read by clicking the button below. Release Int.

UK NHS Employs More People Than Any and All Non-Military Organisations Worldwide. Why Are We Barely In The Top 20?

 Based on 2026 health care index data analyzing public funding, access, and efficiency, the following is a list of top-performing nations with high-quality publicly funded or heavily subsidized healthcare systems. [1, 2, 3]

Top 15 Best Publicly Funded Healthcare Systems (2026)
These nations are recognized for providing universal, high-quality, and accessible care with strong government funding. [123]
  1. Taiwan (1st): Leads global rankings with a single-payer system providing nearly 100% coverage.
  2. South Korea: Renowned for efficient, public National Health Insurance with exceptional technology.
  3. Netherlands: A top-tier system based on managed competition, with strong state regulation.
  4. Japan: Offers universal coverage with low patient costs and high life expectancy.
  5. Austria: Features a high-quality public healthcare network and strong patient satisfaction.
  6. Ecuador: Ranked highly for its public health initiatives and accessible care.
  7. Finland: Often cited for having one of the world's best tax-financed systems.
  8. Thailand: Known for its highly efficient, publicly financed universal coverage.
  9. Denmark: Features comprehensive, publicly funded healthcare with high public financing.
  10. Spain: Offers a premier Mediterranean public system, fully funded by taxes.
  11. France: Consistently high-ranked, public-led system that provides universal coverage.
  12. Belgium: Combines mandatory insurance with public funding, high patient satisfaction.
  13. Czech Republic: Strong public system with very low patient wait times.
  14. Norway: Exemplary universal healthcare system subsidized heavily by the government.
  15. Lithuania: Recognized for improving its national health insurance system. [12345]
  • 16. Estonia: Known for digital integration and public insurance
  • 17. Luxembourg: High-quality public care through taxes and mandatory insurance
  • 18. Qatar: Offers robust public sector services
  • 19. Israel: Features a high-quality, universal, non-profit system
  • 20. United Kingdom: The National Health Service (NHS).

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Venerating, HUH?

The Bible forbids using icons in worship: Religious art vs. religious icon.

Worshippers who use icons claim that they are not really worshipping them, only venerating them. Some even renumber the commandments so that the second is hidden behind the first. But they are, in fact, doing exactly what the second commandment describes and forbids. Changing the name of what they are doing and claiming that excuses them is no more convincing than calling adultery “love making” and thinking that makes it okay. The core prohibition of the second commandment is not about an attitude toward the image or what the image is of (e.g., Christ or a saint), but about what is done with it. “You shall not bow down to them or serve them.” To “serve them” suggests performing acts of worship.

This is why the intricate theological debate over the distinction between worship (latria) and mere veneration (dulia) is moot. The commandment forbids a particular use of the image: making it a focal point of prayer or adoration, bowing before it, or using it as a tool in religious devotion. When an image is used this way, it becomes an icon, and the second commandment explicitly forbids it.

Art is not iconography

It’s crucial to differentiate between religious art (decorations, stained glass) and a religious icon.

Orthodox theologians themselves define an icon by its liturgical function: “The icon’s purpose is liturgical.” It is not merely a decoration in a worship space but is actively used in worship. The Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America defines an icon: “The primary purpose of the icon is to aid in worship.” By definition, an icon is an image used in religious devotion.

This distinction is key when iconodules (supporters of icons) point to images allowed in the Old Testament, such as the cherubim over the Ark of the Covenant or the bronze serpent Moses made (Numbers 21). These were symbolic images or decorations, but they were never used in worship. The cherubim were not bowed to, and the bronze serpent was destroyed by King Hezekiah the moment it was turned into an icon (2 Kings 18:4). The discovery of early Christian art in catacombs or churches, therefore, does not automatically imply the discovery of early Christian iconography. Art for viewing is not the same as an image used for veneration.

The unanimous early church testimony

The historical record from the first four centuries reveals a consistent and unanimous opposition to icons among Christian writers, a position known as aniconism. While Christians fell on a spectrum — from rigorist aniconism (against all images anywhere) to lax aniconism (against only using images in worship) — no one in the early church crossed the line to allow images in devotion.

  • Clement of Alexandria insisted that “works of art cannot then be sacred and divine.” 
  • Tertullian required artists to cease image-making to be accepted into the church, declaring all “similitude” interdicted.
  • Lactantius famously wrote, “wherefore it is undoubted that there is no religion wherever there is an image.” 
  • Arnobius of Sicca noted that pagans criticized Christians for their “very serious charge of impiety because ... [we] do not set up statues and images of any god.”
  • Origen famously declared that Christians, “being taught in the school of Jesus Christ, have rejected all images and statues.”
  • The Synod of Elvira (c. 300–314) stated: “Pictures are not to be placed in churches, so that they do not become objects of worship and adoration.” This council documented the common practice of the time: keeping images out of places of worship to prevent their use as icons.
  • Eusebius of Caesarea rebuked the emperor’s sister, Constantia, for requesting a picture of Christ, citing the second commandment: “Did the reading escape you where God commanded not to make any likeness of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath?” He admitted to confiscating purported images of Christ and Paul “lest we might seem to carry around our God in an image, as idolaters do.”
  • Epiphanius of Salamis wrote a letter detailing how he entered a church in Palestine, saw a curtain bearing an image of Christ or a saint, and immediately tore it asunder and ordered it be used to bury a pauper, stating such images are “contrary to our religion.”

When did icons arrive?

For the first five centuries of Christianity, there is no evidence of any Christian — not even a minority faction — approving the use of images in worship. The veneration of icons was an absolute novelty that emerged later, triggering a violent and divisive controversy in the 8th century when superficially converted pagans brought their idolatry into the church.

The famous Second Council of Nicaea (787), which mandated the use of icons, did so centuries after the early church period. Empress Irene, who had been alienated from her late husband for her icons, rigged the council to deliver the result she wanted. In doing so, it effectively anathematized the universal practice of the Church Fathers who had come before it. The style and use of the icons it championed were, as noted by historian Henry Chadwick, heavily influenced by pagan traditions, borrowing from images of Zeus and venerated mother goddesses.

The conclusion is stark: the early church strictly prohibited icons. They are not a part of apostolic tradition; they are a later innovation.

Birdie.


 

Pastor Freed.

Nkor Deacon Jang 3


 

Sorry. I only just spotted this:

India flag

Podcast.

 Providence And Persecution With Background

2 Peter 1.

Confirming One’s Calling and Election.

3) His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness. 4) Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature, having escaped the corruption in the world caused by evil desires.

Päivi Räsänen and Lutheran Bishop Juhana Pohjola.

Dear All,

Can a decades-old church booklet, written by a Christian for her church, be treated as a crime? That is the question before Europe’s top human rights court.  

With the legal support of ADF International, Päivi Räsänen and Lutheran Bishop Juhana Pohjola are appealing their criminal convictions before the European Court of Human Rights, alongside allied Finnish lawyer Matti Sankamo.  

On 26 March 2026, after nearly seven years of legal proceedings, the Supreme Court of Finland found Päivi guilty of “hate speech” for a church booklet she wrote 22 years ago. Bishop Pohjola and the Luther Foundation Finland were convicted alongside Päivi for publishing the booklet for their church. They were convicted under Finland’s 2011 “hate speech” law that falls under the War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity section of the country’s criminal code.  

The Court ordered Päivi, the Bishop, and the Foundation to pay thousands of euros in fines, in addition to ordering that the statements deemed “hate speech” within the booklet be “removed from public access and destroyed.”  

The booklet was written at the request of her church and was intended to equip the congregation to form a biblical worldview on a pressing national issue (the debate over the redefinition of marriage in Finland at the time). As expected of a church communication, it contains scripture and Christian teachings to help guide the congregation through issues of sexuality and marriage.  

This case underscores why it is more important than ever to stand firm against so-called “hate speech” laws. These dangerous laws suppress public debate and pose a grave threat to free and democratic societies.  

"The failure of the Finnish Supreme Court to uphold freedom of speech has set a dangerous precedent in my country and across Europe. I feel it is my duty to appeal this decision, to reinstate respect for the basic human right that all are free to peacefully express their views in the public square. 

"I know I am not alone in facing unjust persecution under ‘hate speech’ laws that make sharing Christian beliefs a criminal offence. I make my appeal in the hope that the European Court of Human Rights will recognise that peacefully expressing one's beliefs is never a crime and ensure that this basic freedom is protected for all,” said Päivi.  

 "The Supreme Court's decision to convict me and the Lutheran Foundation for publishing a booklet for our church was extremely disappointing. As a Bishop, I have a responsibility to guide those under my pastoral care, and I am deeply concerned by the state's extensive efforts to censor our beliefs and decide what can and cannot be taught by religious leaders to members of their own group. It is our intention to join Päivi Räsänen in appealing to the European Court of Human Rights in defence of our free speech and religious freedom rights, and those of everyone in Finland.” — Bishop Pohjola  

We are immensely proud of Päivi and Bishop Pohjola for their courage, integrity, and perseverance. They have stood strong not just for themselves, but for the freedom of all to speak openly without fear.  

We receive no public funding and never charge our clients for legal support. Everything we receive comes from the generosity of people like you. Will you stand with us as we continue to lead the global battle for freedom of speech?

Give Today

Pastor in Mexico.

Pastor in Mexico jailed, expelled for refusing to participate in Catholic ritua l. 26 Jan, 2026 13:06 EST Officials in a village in southern...