Saturday, December 06, 2025

The Trojan Horse.

Poster depicting terrorist leader Marwan Barghouti at his trial

Celebrity narcissists looking for another virtue to signal have alighted upon a fresh cause appropriate to their moral stature: freedom for a notorious mass murderer of the innocent.

Some 200 high-profile actors and musicians, including Benedict Cumberbatch, Mark Ruffalo, Cynthia Nixon, Sir Ian McKellen, Paul Simon, Sting and Brian Eno, have called for pressure on Israel to release the former Fatah terrorist leader, Marwan Barghouti, from prison.

Barghouti consistently comes top of opinion polls asking Palestinian Arabs who they want to replace 90-year-old Mahmoud Abbas as head of the Palestinian Authority.

Now these celebrities have jumped on the bandwagon, describing Barghouti as a “powerful symbol of unity and a longtime advocate for freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people” and claiming that he has been “illegally held by Israel” for more than two decades.

The petition and its signatories are listed on a campaign website under the slogan “Free Marwan”. The site presents Barghouti as “a husband and a father” and a “nation-builder” who has “consistently believed in a future rooted in international law”.

Even by the standards of today’s morally degenerate celebrity followers of the Palestinian cause, this is jaw-dropping.

Barghouti was properly convicted in 2002, with overwhelming evidence, for orchestrating multiple deadly terror attacks during the years of the Second Intifada, in which he murdered five people, including four Israelis and a Greek monk. The court determined that Barghouti also bore moral responsibility for numerous other terror attacks in which many more Israelis were murdered.

On entering the courtroom before being found guilty, Barghouti flashed a victory sign with his shackled hands and declared to all: “So long as occupation continues, the intifada will not stop. As long as Palestinian mothers are weeping, Israeli mothers will also weep.”

This is the man who these celebrities have described as “a longtime advocate for freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people” and have likened to Nelson Mandela, the South African leader who, for the West, is the nearest thing to a secular saint.

Actors and other showbiz types habitually support ridiculous causes. It goes with the territory for individuals whose lives are a performance, playing roles and gazing at their own image in rapt adoration. Posturing as high-minded idealists, they tend to be the worst kind of liberal hypocrites.

This type of person generally maintains a principled opposition to war on the basis that civilised people oppose violence and believe instead in reason, negotiation and compromise. Yet here they are promoting as a hero someone who has committed heinous acts of mass murder that they don’t even seem to register as violence, and certainly not as attacks against the innocent.

Their ignorance is epic. They know nothing about Israel or the Middle East other than what they have absorbed as Palestinian propaganda. Even so, choosing to support a monster like Barghouti requires further explanation.

This is part of a pattern of behaviour among people on the left going back centuries. Ever since the French Revolution they have been drawn to revolutionary violence, manifesting itself in more recent times as support of bloody tyrants such as Stalin, Che Guevara and Pol Pot, or terrorist causes such as the IRA in Ireland or the Palestinian Arabs.

Such left-wingers appear to be seduced by the apparent romance of the revolutionary, someone who practises a violence that they themselves wouldn’t dream of using. For such people, violence is what’s used by people of whom they disapprove, such as Israelis. Violence against Israelis isn’t violence but resistance.

Consumed by various types of guilt — their privileged backgrounds, their wealth, their whiteness — they outsource its expiation to individuals demonstrating resistance to an equivalent oppression.

Believing that only by such “resistance” can their ideals be realised about the betterment of society, they tell themselves that bringing about the end of oppression justifies the means.

The terrorist’s violence is thus sanitised, and the innocents he has murdered are dehumanised. The celebrities think these victims deserved what they got because their very existence was an offence against the righteousness of the cause.

And the righteousness of the Palestinian cause is held to be axiomatic. Throughout the “progressive” world, it is the cause of causes.

One reason for this is its promotion by the global human-rights humanitarian complex. Led by the Hamas-sympathising United Nations, which has betrayed its role as the global avatar of peace and justice and instead turned into the tool of tyrants, kleptocrats and fanatics, this complex has weaponised international law to persecute the world’s only Jewish state.

A new report by NGO Monitor has highlighted just how corrupt this complex is. Based on internal Hamas documents, the report spotlights the terrorist group’s systematic control of foreign NGOs operating in Gaza.

Hamas operatives describe their surveillance of NGO officials and offices, their methods for manipulating foreign-funded humanitarian groups, and the military and intelligence-gathering considerations that guide the limitations they impose on NGO activity. Similarly, the documents reveal that NGOs have hidden or downplayed Hamas abuses and acquiesced to its demands.

One document from 2021 suggests that Oxfam worked with a Hamas-linked local group on an infrastructure project that appears to have contributed to Hamas military preparations.

Medical Aid for Palestinians-UK’s “administrative director” in Gaza works in Hamas’s military arm and “is affiliated with Hamas and has pledged allegiance to its rule”.

The “guarantor” for US-registered Catholic Relief Services, the director of the NGO in Gaza, is “affiliated with the Popular Front [for the Liberation of Palestine] (PFLP)” which is designated as a foreign terrorist organisation by the United States, the European Union and Canada.

None of this is likely to make a shred of difference among the celebrities calling for Barghouti’s release. This is because the Palestinian cause has helped destroy the West’s moral compass.

This cause stands for nothing less than the destruction of Israel. The Palestinian Arabs say so repeatedly.

They teach their children to hate and murder Jews. They demonise the Jews as rats, snakes or octopuses — monstrous demonic figures said to be secretly controlling the world in their own interests.

This is why many Jews in the West view the forest of Palestine flags on their streets as a forest of Nazi flags. It’s why British Jews view the hospital nurse or business associate who confronts them wearing a Palestine pin with as much dread as if they’re wearing a swastika.

Yet for “progressives,” the Palestinian cause is their badge of conscience.

This is why it has corrupted Western discourse and thinking. Those who have embraced that cause parrot the same blood libels about Israel, the same visceral disgust of Jews, the same deranged and poisonous fantasies, the same recycling of the ancient stereotypes — “Jewish supremacy,” the “chosen people,” the blood libels.

Posing as the championing of an oppressed people, the Palestinian cause has legitimised such vile discourse and made it respectable in Western society. It has also normalised the inversion of truth and lies, victim and victimiser, aggression and defense.

This has not just caused Western useful idiots to promote a mass murderer as a hero. It has not just damaged the West’s ability to acknowledge the Islamist war of extermination against Israel. It has also undermined the West’s ability to acknowledge the Islamist war of conquest against itself.

The inverted thinking that accuses the Israeli Jewish victims of genocidal assault of being the genocidal aggressors is the same mindset that denounces those who warn against the Islamists’ agenda to conquer the West as being guilty of “Islamophobia”.

The Palestinian cause is the Trojan horse for antisemitism. And antisemitism is the Trojan horse for the attack on Western civilisation.


Melanie  Phillips.

Friday, December 05, 2025

Morally Unacceptable!

Question Time fans rage ‘defund the BBC’ after small boat migrants ‘planted’ in audience.

BBC host Fiona Bruce explained she'd invited "three or four" asylum seekers onto the immigration special.

By Jess Phillips, Showbiz Editor

God Is Indubitably Good!


 

The Ten Commandments.

https://cdn.christianpost.com/files/original/thumbnail/26/80/268023.jpg
 

Birdie.


 

Hmm. Not For Me.

 Dispensationalism is a Christian theological framework that divides biblical history into distinct periods called "dispensations," in which God interacts with humanity differently. It interprets the Bible literally and emphasizes a distinction between ethnic Israel and the Christian Church, viewing them as separate entities with different roles in God's plan. This system of theology is primarily associated with American evangelicalism and was formally developed in the 19th century, most notably by John Nelson Darby. 

Samaritan's Purse plane hijacked.

https://cdn.christianpost.com/files/original/thumbnail/26/80/268053.jpg
 

Thursday, December 04, 2025

The National Trust Has Lost My Support.

 https://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-documentarian-banned-from-filming-at-historic-site.html

Trust in The Lord.


 

Fascinating and Indubitably Accurate.

The most dangerous enemy America faces.

America has no shortage of enemies. China seeks to eclipse us geopolitically. Radical Islamists dream of our downfall. Cultural Marxists work tirelessly to dismantle our institutions. Secularists wage war on faith, history, and tradition. Our streets are fraught with crime, our politics with venom, our families with fracture.

But of all the adversaries that threaten the very soul of this nation, none is more profound, more insidious, or more spiritually corrosive than the rise of Progressive Christianity.

Why do I say this? Because Progressive Christianity wears an attractive attire of faith while quietly emptying it of its substance. It keeps the Bible’s vocabulary but drains it of meaning. It blesses what God condemns and condemns what God blesses. In doing so, it leaves our nation defenseless, not just politically or culturally, but morally and spiritually.

One need only glance at the trajectory of progressive theology to see its insidious shape. Scripture’s authority is the first casualty. Once the Bible is dismissed as myth and folklore — stripped of its divine inspiration, authority, and inerrancy — what follows is not mere drift but apostasy. Every doctrine, every moral boundary, every spiritual truth falls like dominoes. Sin is no longer rebellion against a holy God but merely a failure to “live authentically.” Sexual ethics are reimagined, with everything from LGBT behavior to adultery and fornication celebrated as legitimate expressions of love. Abortion becomes a “sacrament of autonomy.” Gender becomes fluid. Idolatry becomes spiritual pluralism. Judgment becomes symbolic. Hell — once the solemn warning of the Lord Jesus Himself — is reduced to a psychological metaphor, then dismissed altogether. This is not enlightened theological evolution. This is a damnable doctrinal demolition.

Here lies one of the great ironies of our time: Progressive Christians have long contended that conservative evangelicals should stay out of politics — that faith should have no role in public policy, that pastors should not speak to cultural issues, that the church must remain within its “private spiritual lane.” Yet in recent years, their own doctrinal reinterpretations have shaped the direction of this country far more profoundly, and far more negatively, than any sermon, rally, or voter guide ever produced by Christian conservatives.

When Progressive Christianity dismantles biblical authority, denies moral absolutes, blesses sexual anarchy, redefines family, sanctifies abortion, and erases the fear of God, these ideas do not remain within the walls of the church. They spill outward into legislation, education, entertainment, and cultural norms. Their theology has influenced our courts, our classrooms, and our culture, always drifting toward moral permissiveness and spiritual decay.

To ensure conservative believers remain silent, progressive clergy smear Christian conservatives with labels like “Christian nationalist,” a term so elastic it can be stretched to vilify anyone who believes Scripture should inform the national conscience. It is a weapon, not a description. It’s meant to intimidate and delegitimize anyone who refuses to surrender biblical truth. By demanding that conservatives retreat, progressives have cleared the public square for their worldview to dominate. The results have been spiritually devastating for America.

History illustrates just how dangerous this is. Germany — the land of Martin Luther, the cradle of the Reformation — did not collapse spiritually overnight. It started in the seminaries, where liberal theologians divested Scripture of its supernatural core. Miracles were dismissed. The resurrection was “demythologized.” Judgment was declared incompatible with an “enlightened society.” Moral commands were viewed as culturally conditioned. By the time Hitler rose to power, the German church was spiritually hollowed out. Its pulpits had already stopped preaching sin, judgment, and the fear of God. So, when real evil appeared, the Church lacked the moral clarity to stand against it.

Germany did not fall because Christianity failed the nation. It fell because a counterfeit had supplanted Christianity.

The parallels to America today are chilling. Progressive Christianity is training a generation to believe that God does not judge, that sin is whatever society says it is, that Jesus came not to redeem but to affirm, that the Bible must bow before cultural sensibilities, and that salvation is really unnecessary because everyone is already acceptable to God as they are.

Our nation cannot long endure such a spiritual vacuum. No external enemy can destroy a country faster than a church emptied of the truth. For once, the pulpits surrender, the people lose their compass. When the people lose their compass, every institution eventually collapses — the family, government, education, law, culture. Without the fear of God, the moral imagination of a nation darkens.

Progressive Christianity, then, is not simply another view of Christianity. It is actually a dismantling of the Christian faith from the inside. It is a spiritual Trojan horse. It is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. It offers America all the trappings of Christianity but none of its power. It lulls the nation into a false peace while severing it from a Holy God who judges those who transgress His law, and a gracious God who mercifully saves sinners.

America may face adversaries abroad and agitators at home. Still, none is more dangerous than a fake Christianity that preaches grace without a Cross, a kingdom without righteousness, and a God without holiness. If America falls, it will not be because our enemies outside the gate were stronger. It will be because the enemies inside our sanctuaries and standing in the pulpits were subtler than we realized, preaching a Gospel without a rugged Cross and a Christ without a crown.

A faith stripped of truth cannot save a soul, much less save a civilization.

Rev. Mark H. Creech is Executive Director of the Christian Action League of North Carolina, Inc. He was a pastor for twenty years before taking this position, having served five different Southern Baptist churches in North Carolina and one Independent Baptist in upstate New York.

Birdie.


 

Evangelical Catholics. (I'm not sure that I understood all of this.)

11 reasons I’m an Evangelical Catholic.


I realize the title of this article may sound like an oxymoron. However, the original Protestant Reformers never viewed themselves as abandoning the Catholic Church. The term “Catholic,” which simply means universal, was not synonymous with Roman Catholicism in their minds. They believed they were reforming the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church, not departing from it.

Consequently, in an age of theological confusion and denominational fragmentation, for the past several decades I found myself increasingly drawn to a vision of the Church that is both ancient and reformational, rooted in the apostolic faith and renewed by the power of the Holy Spirit. For this reason, I consider myself an Evangelical Catholic: (not a Roman Catholic!) a believer who affirms the essential truths of the Protestant Reformation while holding fast to the spiritual richness and theological depth of the historic, catholic (universal) Church. This is not about denominational identity but about fidelity to the fullness of the faith once delivered to the saints.

Here are 11 reasons why I identify as a Protestant Catholic:

1. I Believe in Scripture alone as the final authority, but not as a solo Scriptura

The Reformers championed sola Scriptura, that the Bible is the highest authority in matters of faith and practice. I affirm this wholeheartedly. But “Scripture alone” does not mean “Solo Scriptura” or “me and my Bible alone.” The Evangelical Catholic reads Scripture within the historic, Spirit-filled community of faith, guided by the creeds, councils, and trusted teachers of the Church. We do not worship tradition, but we respect it as the echo of the Spirit’s voice through the ages.

2. I embrace the great tradition without submitting to post-biblical innovations

Being Evangelical means I reject doctrines that emerged in reaction to or in deviation from the apostolic faith — like the Roman dogmas of papal infallibility or the immaculate conception of Mary. Being catholic means to embrace the Church’s creeds, its patristic wisdom, and its liturgical heritage. I am not interested in reinventing Christianity every generation. I desire a rooted, durable faith — one that spans the centuries and draws strength from the historic communion of saints.

3. I hold to justification by faith — but also to the transforming power of grace

The Reformers rightly taught that we are justified by faith alone, apart from works. I affirm this as the heart of the Gospel. Yet true faith is never alone — it brings transformation. The grace that justifies also sanctifies. True catholicity rejects the false dichotomy between faith and obedience, between salvation and discipleship. We are saved by grace alone, but grace is not cheap — it is the power of God that reorders the soul for the purpose of engaging in good works (Ephesians 2:8-10).

4. I believe in the unity of the Church — not denominational tribalism

Jesus prayed in John 17 that His followers would be one, just as He and the Father are one. This is spiritual oneness with the Triune God, His body. As an Evangelical Catholic, I also long for the visible unity of the Church — not through institutional uniformity, but through spiritual and missional harmony. I do not align myself with sectarianism that pits one group of Christians against another. Rather, I seek to honor the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church, even if I disagree strongly with some aspects of historical expressions of Christianity.

5. I practice a sacramental life without sacramental legalism

I believe that baptism and the Lord’s Supper are more than mere symbols. They are means of grace, through which God acts upon the believer in faith. I reject the notion that these practices are magical or salvific in themselves, but I also reject the modern evangelical reduction of them to mere symbols.” An Evangelical Catholic can espouse a high view of the sacraments without falling into some extreme teachings of sacramentalism. 

6. I value the mystical and contemplative streams of the Church

Too much of modern Christianity is shallow, distracted, and performative. As an Evangelical Catholic, I draw deeply from some of the wells of Christian mysticism — from Augustine’s longing for God, to Bernard of Clairvaux’s fiery love of Christ, to the Eastern fathers’ vision of theosis. While I test all spiritual practices by the Word, I recognize the importance of silence, stillness, and interior transformation. God is not just to be studied — He is to be encountered.

7. I uphold apostolic ministry without apostolic elitism

I believe the five ministry gifts of Ephesians 4:11; however, I do not confuse biblical apostolicity with hierarchical dominance. An Evangelical Catholic vision of apostolic ministry is servant-oriented, Christ-centered, and accountable, not based on personal ambition or dynastic control. The historic Apostolic Episcopacy exists to ground the Church in truth and launch it into mission.

8. I Preach the Kingdom of God, not just individual salvation

The church throughout the ages not only emphasized personal salvation, but also the priesthood of all believers, and the sacredness of work as a vocation. Furthermore, Protestant Reformers like Calvin held that God’s moral law (the Decalogue) provided the ethical framework for both personal conduct and civil order

As an Evangelical Catholic, I believe Salvation includes the Lordship of Christ, renewing every aspect of civilization. I preach the cross and resurrection not only as a personal benefit but as a cosmic victory. 

9. I love the Church Fathers and learn from them

Many believers have little knowledge of the early Church Fathers, yet these men — Athanasius, Irenaeus, Cyril, Maximus, and Augustine — laid the groundwork for much of what we believe. As an Evangelical Catholic, I read them not as infallible authorities but as wise guides who preserved the faith under fire. 

10. I believe the Church must be both Reformed and ever reforming

An Evangelical Catholic subscribes to some form of the Protestant mantra “Ecclesia reformata semper reformanda est”— the Church reformed must always be reforming. This is not a license for theological innovation but a call to constant repentance, humility, and realignment with Scripture. I do not seek nostalgia for a golden age nor bow to cultural trends. Instead, I seek a Church that is faithful, historically rooted in the great tradition, mission-driven, and Spirit-empowered — a Church that recovers the past to redeem the future.

11. I am not a restorationist

I do not believe the Ephesians 4:11 ministry gifts were missing for 1800 years and restored in the 20th century. God has been building His church for 2000 years and never left Himself without a witness of all the ministry expressions of His Son. 

To be an Evangelical Catholic is to hold the tension between truth and tradition, Word and Spirit, past and future. It means grounding ourselves in Scripture, standing with the historic universal Church, and living out the Gospel in the world today.

Dr. Joseph Mattera is renowned for addressing current events through the lens of Scripture by applying biblical truths and offering cogent defenses to today's postmodern culture. To order his bestselling books or to join the many thousands who subscribe to his acclaimed newsletter, go to www.josephmattera.org. 

Sin Cities.

 https://www.christianpost.com/news/americas-top-5-most-sinful-cities-list.html

Lots Of Dreadful Things Come From Brussels.

‘Insult to Our Traditions’: Faceless ‘Inclusive’ Nativity Scene Sparks Backlash in Brussels.

An artwork by German artist Victoria-Maria featuring the Christmas nativity scene with facNicolas TUCAT / AFP via Getty Images

A faceless and “inclusive” Nativity scene put on by the city of Brussels has sparked controversy and calls for it to be removed, with critics branding the installation as an insult to Christian heritage and tradition.

On Friday, the Brussels city government unveiled its new Nativity scene at the Grand-Place, the medieval market square in the city centre of the Belgian capital. The city said that it was necessary to replace its previous feature as it had become dilapidated and difficult to transport without destroying it.

Mayor of Brussels Philippe Close, a self-described secularist and Socialist Party politician, said that he farmed out the design of the new Nativity scene to the Cathedrals of St. Michael and St. Gudula, who selected the design of Brussels-based artist Victoria-Maria.

Unlike traditional Nativity scenes, the one designed by Victoria-Maria was made entirely of recycled fabrics, and the figures of Mary, Joseph, the baby Jesus, a donkey, the Three Wise Men, a shepherd, and a sheep were all faceless, replaced with a pixelated patchwork of beige and brown fabrics.

A member of the designing team told La Libre the purpose was to create “an inclusive mix of all skin tones, so that everyone can see themselves reflected.”

However, many found the scene insulting, including Belgian Senator Georges-Louis Bouchez, who described the faceless figures as being more akin to the “zombies at Brussels stations than a real nativity scene”.

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM - NOVEMBER 28: German born interior architect and designer Victoria Maria Geyer (L) and the Brussels Mayor Philippe Close (R) pose beside the controversial nativity scene in Brussels Grand-Place on November 28, 2025 in Brussels, Belgium. In 2025 Brussels installed a "faceless,inclusive" nativity scene made from recycled textiles at the GrandPlace, prompting criticism that the redesign erases traditional religious imagery while supporters tout it as a modern, secular interpretation; simultaneously, the European Parliament displayed a nativity scene for the first time, sparking debate over whether such a display could be seen as offensive to nonbelievers (Photo by Thierry Monasse/Getty Images)

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM – NOVEMBER 28: German-born interior architect and designer Victoria Maria Geyer (L) and the Brussels Mayor Philippe Close (R) pose beside the controversial nativity scene in Brussels Grand-Place on November 28, 2025, in Brussels, Belgium. (Photo by Thierry Monasse/Getty Images)

“How ugly, a society that denies its values… This nativity scene is terrible and an insult to our traditions… It is unacceptable to see our traditions erode time and again because of so-called inclusivity,” the Reformist Movement leader wrote on X.

“An inclusive society is one that brings people together — and Christmas is THE holiday that does that.”

Bouchez called for the Nativity to be replaced “immediately, or at the latest for next year’s edition.” Mayor Close had previously said the city hopes the scene will be used for at least the next five years.

Professor of Cognitive Psychology, Wouter Duyck, of Ghent University, suggested that political correctness and a fear of angering Brussels’ large Muslim population was the true inspiration for the faceless Nativity scene.

“In Islam, the faces of prophets are not depicted. This is the nativity scene in the capital of Europe. Whoever decided to impose a hierarchy on religions in favour of the least tolerant one?” Prof Duyck questioned.

“As a freethinker, I am greatly concerned about our secularity/neutrality. Co-existence and freedom of religion require precisely that you do not impose things on others. The strange thing is that it is not Muslims who are doing this (I hope).”

He suggested that it was a “misplaced fallacy” among liberals, holding that “spewing mist over one’s own traditions, values, and fundamental principles would be beneficial for integration and would facilitate living together in diversity.”

Meanwhile, the Mayor’s office said on Saturday that the head of baby Jesus was stolen from the Nativity scene, De Standaard reported. It is so far unclear what the motive for the theft was.


Breitbart.

Open Doors.

 

Robin* in Bangladesh refuses to deny Jesus. That’s why his dad abandoned him and his mum, leaving them penniless and alone. Villagers attacked his church, and schoolmates taunt and reject him. 


“I feel sad when they treat me like this,” says Robin. “I’m not angry, but I feel sad.”


Persecution has torn Robin’s life apart – but he is committed to Christ. This Christmas, will you help unwrap hope for him?


Every £34 could support two persecuted families with much-needed

emergency relief.

Thank you, and every blessing,

Henrietta Blyth, CEO, Open Doors UK & Ireland


*Name changed for security reasons