Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Lessons From Moses.

Lessons from Moses.

Moses (Photo: Getty/iStock)

Hebrew scholar and Jewish academic Irene Lancaster explains the Jewish perspective on the choosing of Moses and the women who made him who he was.

In the Jewish calendar, we have just started the Book of Exodus, known in Hebrew as Shemot - Names. The first Sedra encompasses Chapters 1 to 6:1. Here we are introduced to six women, four of them not Jewish - but all of them heroic. This isn’t mere coincidence. Baby Moses would have been dead without them, but all six were necessary to the birth and nurture of the man regarded by Judaism as its greatest teacher and leader.

The fact that four of these women were not Jewish, even if three of them later converted, demonstrates beyond a doubt that Judaism isn’t interested in gaining adherents - far better to have the whole world imbued with basic values than to force people to conform to a particular way of life. In the Jewish view, other ways of life are also part of G-d’s plan, as long as basic values are adhered to. These values would include setting up law courts and caring for animals. Thousands of years later, how many countries adhere to the rule of law and abstain from cruelty to animals? Not many!

But these women went beyond the norm. They all risked their lives for baby Moses, while the sixth woman eventually married him and taught him a thing or two when it came to their own baby!

The first two women were Moses’ sister Miriam who persuaded her parents to stay together when things were going badly under Pharoah. Then his mother Yocheved gave birth to him in very difficult circumstances.

Shifra and Puah were the two midwives assigned to the ‘Hebrew’ babies and were supposed to murder the males at birth. However they cared for them instead. Shifra cleaned him up and attended to his physical care, while Puah would coo to him and sing him lullabies. These are the essential elements of baby care, physical and emotional.

In order to save his life, when Pharaoh ordered the male babies to be thrown into the Nile (1:22), Yocheved placed him in the river in a basket and ‘the daughter of Pharaoh … sent her handmaiden to fetch it’ (2:5).

The daughter of Pharaoh became known as Batya - the daughter of G-d. She disobeyed her father’s decree and not only saved the baby from the river but brought him up in her own palace, engaging his mother as his nurse. In this way his first years were dual - hostile Egyptian and familiar Jewish. 

Later, Moses would marry Zipporah, daughter of Yitro, High Priest to the Midianites. According to Jewish tradition they both converted to Judaism and the father-in-law gave Moses a great deal of good advice. 

When Moses’ mind is elsewhere, Zipporah notes G-d’s displeasure and circumcises their own son, Gershon, herself (4.25). She thus appeases G-d’s anger at Moses’ tardiness.

So these are the six women: four not Jewish originally, although Shifra, Puah and Zipporah become righteous converts, while Batya is praised for giving a baby meant for death a comfortable home and keeping ties with his mother. And Miriam, his sister, watched over him from the sidelines.

Thus the stage is set for the story of Judaism’s greatest teacher and leader. He wouldn’t have got anywhere in life without the six women who made sure he survived and flourished, all in opposition to the powers-that-be. 

Somehow, however, Moses never felt quite at home in the Egyptian court. And this is where we turn to the exciting book, Shemot: The Book of Exodus, by Rabbi Dr Nathan Lopes Cardozo, which he has just sent me. Rabbi Cardozo emphasizes Moses’ ‘unorthodox education’ demonstrated by the verse ‘He turned this way and that, and he saw that there was no man, and he struck the Egyptian and hid him in the sand‘ (2:12). 



How did ‘Moshe Rabbenu [become] capable of undertaking the arguably most challenging leadership role in human history: liberating a few million slaves from an entrenched dictatorship and transforming them into a nation of G-d?’ You might think that to inspire millions of people to love G-d would necessitate the best religious education, under the tutelage of the finest teachers, and that you would have to be a ‘holy’ person from early on and require a well-protected environment into which outside heretical ideas could not penetrate and where secularism would play no part.

However, Moses’ experience was very different. A traumatic birth, based in secrecy; apparent abandonment by immediate family; adoption from certain death by an alien person to be brought up in unaccustomed luxury which made him feel uneasy.

And then, when Moses first leaves the palace to visit his enslaved brothers, he is struck by the hard realities of life. Right in front of him a fellow Egyptian is striking a Hebrew slave. With no hesitation, Moses kills the Egyptian and buries him in the ground (2:12). 

Why does Moses, brought up as an Egyptian, take the side of the ‘other’? He was probably unaware of his own origins as the son of a Levite. Therefore an inner voice must have told him of his shared destiny with the Israelite slaves, rather than continue in line with the authorities by whom he had been raised.

He was Pharaoh-in-waiting; why, then, did he reject this path for the perceived enemies of the State with whom he felt more at home? Maybe Moses suddenly realized that he was living in two worlds. He was immersed in Egyptian culture, but his heart was with his true brothers, the Hebrew, Israelite slaves. He heard a voice demanding the opposite of everything Egypt stood for. That is why ‘he turned this way and that.’ 

Moses was at a crossroads. From that moment on he would be a ‘Hebrew’, meaning a person who ‘comes from the other side’. From the Jewish perspective, by smiting the Egyptian man, he is killing off ‘restriction’ within himself and ‘[burying] it in the sand’. This decision turned the world on its head and changed the direction of history. It is one of the most radical decisions ever made, eventually leading both Jews and non-Jews to place G-d at the centre of their lives.

In effect, Moses realized that by terminating his ambivalent situation, he would be destroying his entire future. Not only would he not become the new Pharaoh, but he would actually turn Egypt against him, becoming a wanderer and refugee with no money or future.

Heroism means saying ‘no’ and accepting the consequences of resistance - which is usually oblivion. But in Chapter 3, G-d reveals Himself to Moses in the burning bush. Not his early education, but his radical rebellion against it, led G-d to choose Moses to lead the Hebrew people out of slavery and into the Promised Land, as well as inspiring people worldwide to live a more ethical life. 

To achieve all this, you have to be the ‘rebel within’, oblivious of consequences to yourself. You have to swim against the tide and be prepared for complete rejection. Moses Rabbeinu, brought up in a foreign environment, proved himself to be up to the job!

Moses’ destiny truly began with his ability to question and upset the status quo. The Torah - the first five books of the Bible - was the first rebellious text to appear in world history. It takes apart idol worship, immorality and the worship of man. It protests against complacency, self-satisfaction, imitation and negation of spirit. It calls for radical thinking and drastic action without compromise, even when it means standing alone. Judaism was born out of opposition, rebellion and protest, and it overthrew and outlived mighty empires. 

Throughout history constant failure has often been the spur to greater things. Just look at Winston Churchill, for instance. Even the British monarch of the time rejected his heroic stance against Hitler, until Churchill was proved right and saved the kingdom! In Moses’ case he was already 80 when he was finally able to stop running (2:11-15). Moses was constantly in hiding, never enjoying a moment’s respite, and failing to make an impression. Moses was always the same shepherd, running around in circles and living in dire poverty. Then when he was 80, G-d called him to the ‘burning bush’ (Chapter 3), after which he sent him to liberate his people from bondage.

However, at first his failures exceeded his successes. Moses’ first encounter with Pharaoh ended in defeat. Pharaoh actually ‘hardened his heart’ (Chapter 5) and increased the slaves’ hard toil. After each plague, Moses thought he had achieved his goal, but Pharaoh kept changing his mind, crushing all hope.

Once having crossed the Reed Sea and entered the wilderness, Moses encounters one rebellion after the other. He is blamed for all sorts of perceived wrongs and has to deal with the people’s demands to return to Egypt. 

After the incident of the Golden Calf, G-d tells Moses He will actually destroy the Israelites. Moses felt like a complete failure. He sends the 12 ‘spies’ to survey the Land of Canaan. As a result of that fiasco, he has to spend another 39 years in the wilderness.

Then his opponent, Korach, tries to undermine his authority and Moses is nearly murdered by his own people.

Finally, Moses ignores G-d’s precise instruction; instead of speaking to the rock in order to produce water, he strikes it. He is therefore told that he will never be allowed to enter the Land of Israel.

This devastating news was the final blow. Not to be permitted to set foot in the Land after all his exertions to bring the people to that very place, he must have felt absolutely broken and worthless.

It therefore would never have occurred to Moses that he would be seen as the greatest Jew of all time - and greatly respected by Christians; that his name would be immortalized in Scripture itself, as well as on the lips of millions of people for thousands of years up until the present day and into the future. 

What was the secret of Moses carrying on regardless?

Moses’ secret was that he knew how to lose. He knew that his failures were in fact building blocks for his future successes. He continued to fight and ultimately prevailed. When you reach rock bottom there is nowhere else to go but up. Moses experienced many knocks in life, but inwardly he knew that these knocks were making him stronger and stronger, until finally he became the great leader he was meant to be. 

And let’s not forget that he couldn’t have done any of this without the six women who surrounded him with love from the very beginning: his older sister, his mother, his two Egyptian midwives, his adopted Egyptian mother and his Midian wife. 

This all goes to show that though origins may be important, openness to new ideas take us further, while learning from failure may be the greatest teacher of all! CT.

A Strong Tower.


 

Birdie.


 

Magazines.

 Church magazines still reaching tens of thousands.

Parish PumpParish Pump serves 950 churches, providing editorial content and graphics for their parish magazines.

Local church magazines – printed on paper – are still reaching tens of thousands of readers, despite the massive impact of the web, social media and online communications.

Journalist Anne Coomes, who has produced ‘Parish Pump,’ a subscription service for church magazine editors for more than 26 years, says the publications are maintaining their popularity in many local areas.

She explained, “Overall, there has been a sharp drop in local churches producing magazines, especially during Covid, but recent years have seen the numbers stabilising, with print publications now maintaining their readerships.

“Many of these readers might not search online for information about the Christian faith or their local church community, so the magazines are reaching numerous people outside the church.”  

The importance of print publications in reaching older people has been highlighted by new analysis for the charity Age UK which found that 2.4 million (19 per cent, nearly one in five) older people have limited use of the internet – using it less than once a month or not at all. 

Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell has praised the ministry of local church magazines. He said, “Well-produced magazines can play a vital role in helping churches reach out into their local communities, and to bring the Christian gospel into many people’s homes. Even in a digital world, paper-based communications can help build bridges for local churches.”

Coomes added: “These magazines may be the only Christian literature that many people ever see, so they are an important way in which local churches can communicate the gospel to their communities.”

Parish Pump currently provides material to around 950 churches, with an estimated readership of about 180,000. 

Rev Peter Crumpler is a Church of England minister in St Albans, Herts, and a former communications director with the CofE.

Sickening!



Dear All,

The European Court of Human Rights is deciding a case that seeks to eradicate Christian symbols from public buildings – starting with courtrooms, and with consequences that could extend much further.

The case of Union of Atheists v. Greece involves two applications brought by individuals identifying as atheists, who demanded that Greek courts remove symbols like Christian icons and crosses from courtrooms during hearings on religious matters.  

They claimed these symbols, prevalent across Europe, are discriminatory, undermine the court’s objectivity, and violate their rights to a fair trial and freedom of thought and religion.  

The Greek government disagreed – and refused to remove them. Now the case has reached Europe’s top human rights court, and its ruling could set a precedent for the entire continent.   

This is not the first time such a battle has been fought. 

In the famous 2011 case of Lautsi v Italy, the European court recognised that religious symbols displayed in public institutions form part of Europe’s historical and cultural heritage, reflecting traditions that have shaped national identity over centuries.   

And this is obviously correct.  

Christian icons, crosses, and artwork are not acts of coercion – but longstanding expressions of a nation’s history, culture, and identity.   

And across Europe, there is a longstanding practice of displaying religious symbols in public institutions. Hence, there is no incompatibility between the display of Christian symbols and human rights law.  

But now that position is being challenged by atheists who want to strip our nations of their Christian heritage – one symbol, one building at a time.  

ADF International has intervened in this case to defend the continued display of Christian symbols in public buildings. Our legal brief makes clear: the display of a religious image cannot, by itself, limit anyone’s freedom of belief or call the fairness of a court into question, and there is no right not to be offended by the presence of religious imagery, as critics of religious symbols contend.

Culturally rooted religious symbols or artwork, such as centuries-old Orthodox Christian icons, do not impose a belief on anyone nor do they direct judicial decision-making.  

And claims of state neutrality should never be used to strip our public spaces of the Christian faith that has shaped our societies for millennia.  

With this case, the European Court of Human Rights has the opportunity to demonstrate that Europe’s often stated commitment to human rights must include a clear respect for, and recognition of, our continent’s Christian roots – which as we know – is the very basis for the concept of human rights in the first place. 

Will you help us defend Europe’s Christian foundations? Your generous gift today will directly support this vital legal effort at a moment when the stakes could not be higher.

Give Today
With gratitude for your ongoing support,
ADF UK

CSW. Sudan.

Tue, 27 Jan at 17:33

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Running Scared In ALL Directions?

 Labour expects to lose by-election after Burnham blocked..

Insiders say Sir Keir Starmer chose between a likely defeat in Gorton & Denton and the greater risk of losing control of the Greater Manchester mayoralty. The Times.

Of Course, In Those Days, Most Methodists Were Christians.

Remembering the first UN General Assembly at the Methodist Central Hall.

United Nations General AssemblyAn interior view of Methodist Central Hall during the inaugural United Nations General Assembly. (Photo: UN Photo/Marcel Bolomey)

This Saturday I will be attending a Service of Thanksgiving to mark the 80th anniversary of the first meeting of the General Assembly of the United Nations in Methodist Central Hall, London.

The United Nations came into being in 1945, following the devastation of the Second World War, with one central mission: the maintenance of international peace and security.

The 1946 Assembly was a deliberate act of responsibility — an attempt to build cooperation strong enough to prevent the return of global conflict.

King George VI, First Lady of the United States, Eleanor Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Clement Attlee attended calling for men and women to work for ‘a world of security and freedom’.

The UN website notes: While nearby Church House was selected as the location for the first-ever UN Security Council on 17 January, a larger venue was needed for the General Assembly. Having survived the war intact, Methodist Central Hall was chosen."

British Foreign Minister Ernest Bevin said: “Holding the meeting in a place of worship was symbolic, reflecting both the pain of the war and hope for the future."

The Assembly was in session for over a month.

The UN website notes that "the climate crisis is raging, inequalities are growing, and poverty is on the rise. Terrorism and the nuclear threat persist, and new threats have emerged.’ Artificial intelligence is rushing ahead of regulation". 

So at this most troubled time in the life of our world it seems very pertinent that we take time to remember that gathering in London in 1946 – to remember the post-war devastation against which the UN was established and "the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind".

When I sit in Central Hall on Saturday I will remember an Assembly held in a church in the centre of a heavily bombed London. I will give thanks that it was felt there was no better place for such a meeting than a House of God with the atmosphere of prayer already there, prayer that reflected both the pain of the war and hope for the future.

I will pray that the UN can indeed be one place where the world’s nations can gather together, discuss common problems and find shared solutions for our world facing a climate crisis, rising inequalities and growing poverty, a world where terrorism and the nuclear threat persist, and where artificial intelligence is rushing ahead of regulation.

I will pray for our world today. I will pray that once again we can be a world at peace where as United Nations we practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours.

Rt Rev Rosie Frew is Moderator of the General Assembly of The Church of Scotland.

So Sin Is No Longer An Issue?

Lily Phillips responds to critics who question her faith, won't quit making porn.

Porn star Lily Phillips, whose rebaptism has drawn mixed reactions from Christians, responded to critics who have questioned her commitment to rebuilding her relationship with God in light of her plans to continue creating pornographic and sexually explicit content. CP.

Birdie.


 

Parts.

 ‘If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honoured, every part rejoices with it.’ (1 Corinthians 12:26)

No. I stopped flying Ryanair a good while ago. It was an excellent decision.

.


Andy Burnham: Some seriously negative downsides.

Man voted against inquiries into the Iraq War…repeatedly ... and never really opposed that era of foreign policy disaster - only offering fairly mild criticism. 
But blocking inquiries, I think, was egregious. PS. Reddit.

Monday, January 26, 2026

Hip Hooray!

Suella Braverman defects to Reform 

Suella Braverman, the former home secretary, has defected from the Conservatives to Reform UK!

Announcing her defection at a Reform press conference, Mrs Braverman said: “I feel like I’ve come home.”

Mrs Braverman becomes the 18th current or former Conservative MP to defect to Reform.

She is the latest major name on the Conservative Right to join Mr Farage’s party, less than a fortnight after Robert Jenrick, the former shadow justice secretary, made the move.

Mrs Braverman added: “Britain is indeed broken. She is suffering. She is not well. Immigration is out of control, our public services are on their knees, people don’t feel safe. Our youngsters are leaving the country for better futures elsewhere. DT.

Sergeant York.

 "Sergeant York - The Miracle" refers to the legendary World War I actions of Alvin C. York, a devout Christian who became a reluctant hero, capturing over 100 German soldiers by single-handedly taking out a machine gun nest in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive, an event later dramatized in the famous 1941 film starring Gary Cooper. His story, blending deep faith with extraordinary battlefield courage, became a symbol of American heroism, though the myth surrounding his "miracle" often exaggerates the single-handed aspect, as he led a small group.  

Sergeant Alvin York: Reluctant War Hero

The Man: Alvin C. York
Background: A humble Tennessee farmer and hunter, York was a strong Christian who initially sought conscientious objector status due to his faith, but felt a patriotic duty to serve.
  • Conversion: After a near-death experience and a promise to his mother, York transformed his life, giving up drinking, gambling, and fighting, becoming a Sunday school teacher. 
The "Miracle" Action (October 8, 1918) 
  • The Event: During the Meuse-Argonne Offensive, York's squad was pinned down by heavy German machine gun fire.
  • His Role: He led a daring attack, killing several enemy soldiers and capturing 132, including a major, by taking out multiple machine guns.
  • The Myth vs. Reality: The myth portrays him acting almost entirely alone, but he was part of a small group that broke through, though he was the primary force in neutralizing the machine guns, earning him the Medal of Honor. 
The Legacy: Movie & Legend
  • The Film: The 1941 Warner Bros. film Sergeant York, starring Gary Cooper, cemented his legend, becoming the top-grossing film of the year and winning Oscars, says Wikipedia.
  • "The Miracle": His extraordinary feat of valor against overwhelming odds, combined with his humble, religious character, led to his story being seen as a divine intervention or "miracle" by many. 
  • The Legend of Sergeant York - Scholar Commons
    York shot all six Germans with his . 45 automatic pistol. Ultimately, the surviving Germans on the slope joined the POWs in the va...
  • Sergeant York - The Odd Destiny of America's Greatest WWI ...
    Dec 29, 2023 — because they were so tightly packed together on October 7th 1918. the American army moves into the village of Chhatel Shahari in t...
  • The One-Man Army Who Captured 132 Germans - Alvin York
    Jun 13, 2025 — and the entire time he's just breaking his mom's heart because this is not the sweet young kid that she raised this isn't the man ...

Lessons From Moses.

Lessons from Moses.   (Photo: Getty/iStock) Hebrew scholar and Jewish academic Irene Lancaster explains the Jewish perspective on the choosi...