I fully accept that there is a need - in very limited and extreme circumstances - for interrogations of kidnappers and terrorists to be pretty extreme themselves whenever there is 'a ticking bomb scenario'.
I have just been watching 'The Dark Art of Interrogation." Indeed, I had few problems with the methods used in the circumstances described BUT then again, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Who makes these decisions which fall outside the realms of the standard justice system? What are their qualifications? What are their biases? How do we know that only the guilty are being targeted? How do we know that these things will not be used on mere political opponents? CAN WE TRUST OUR GOVERNMENTS SUFFICIENTLY?
Self explanatory title. I abhor that nicey nicey, politically correct, pseudo-Christianity which almost always supports leftwing attitudes - which in most cases are profoundly anti-Gospel. This Blog supports persecuted Christians. This Blog exposes cults. This Blog opposes junk science. UPDATED DAILY. This is not a forum. This Blog supports truly Christian websites and aids their efforts. It is hardhitting and unashamedly evangelical so if it offends - please do not come to this site!
47 Years of Cowardice Allowing Iranian Brutality. Compare To Apartheid. Iran Has Been CONSIDERABLY Worse. Consider The Nations Who Have NOT Aligned Against This Wretched Regime But Did Against South Africa. Double Standards of The Very Worst Kind!
C harles Moore . Trump is a sinner but by disarming Iran he could be doing the Lord’s work. Christianity accepts it’s not always wrong to f...
-
Franklin Graham preached in Glasgow, launches new fund to defend religious freedom in the UK. Staff writer Franklin Graham preaching at ...
-
Nigel Farage’s general election spending will not be investigated by the elections watchdog, it was confirmed. Labour had called on the E...
