Andrew Dawson - Derby.

In 2010, Andrew Dawson, then 48, killed his neighbours Paul Hancock, 58, and John David Matthews, 66, in their flats in Derby, an inquest heard.

The two men were both found with multiple stab wounds five days apart.

However, Derbyshire area coroner Peter Nieto said the concerns raised did not contribute to their deaths.

Mr Nieto recorded a ruling of unlawful killing for both victims.

An inquest at Chesterfield Coroner's Court heard Dawson was jailed for killing a 91-year-old man in Ormskirk, Lancashire, in 1982 and was released on life licence in 1999.

He returned to jail for breaching conditions in 2003, 2004 and 2007 and was last released from prison in 2008. BBC  News.

Blogger: please read the above then answer the following questions:

1) If Dawson had been executed in 1982, would he have been in any position to take the lives of Mr Hancock and Mr Matthews in 2010? - No. Thought not.

2) Why doesn't the tragic and unnecessary loss of these two decent lives attract anywhere near as much publicity as alleged 'miscarriages of justice' from 65+ years ago?

3) Why was he released so ridiculously early after just 17 years for such a heinous crime against a very elderly victim?

4) If, as we are told, 'a life sentence is in place for life' - how come they kept repeatedly releasing this horrendous individual back into society when he persistently opted to break his conditions of release?

5) How has justice been served by holding the death of the shopkeeper in 1982 as being the equivalent of just 17 years in a comfortable British prison?

6) When a 'mad dog' bites someone - it will usually be put down so how is it that evil people like Dawson are treated differently for acts which are considerably worse?

7) Why must the taxpayers fork out millions of pounds to keep this evil man alive just because we are so wet as a society we lack the resolve to do the decent thing with him.

8) Do we truly believe that keeping Dawson alive is more moral than executing justice upon him? Why so?

9) Why do abolitionists wish to grant people like Dawson the freedom to kill any human being they may choose in the full and free knowledge that their own lives can never be threatened? How moral is that?