1960
|
282
|
1980
|
549
|
2000
|
792
| ||||||
1961
|
265
|
1981
|
499
|
2000/01
|
891
| ||||||
1962
|
299
|
1982
|
557
|
2001/02
|
1048
| ||||||
1963
|
307
|
1983
|
482
|
2002/03
|
853
| ||||||
*1964*
|
296
|
1984
|
537
|
2003/04
|
868
| ||||||
1965
|
325
|
1985
|
536
|
2004/05
|
765
| ||||||
1966
|
364
|
1986
|
563
|
2005/09
|
759
| ||||||
1967
|
414
|
1987
|
599
|
2006/07
|
753
| ||||||
1968
|
420
|
1988
|
547
|
2007/08
|
651
| ||||||
1969
|
395
|
1989
|
525
|
2008/09
| 640 | ||||||
1970
|
396
|
1990
|
555
| 2009/10 | 608 | ||||||
1971
|
459
|
1991
|
623
| 2010/11 |
636
| ||||||
1972
|
480
|
1992
|
581
| 2011/12 | 550 | ||||||
1973
|
465
|
1993
|
565
| 2012/13 | |||||||
1974
|
599
|
1994
|
632
| 2013/14 | 523 | ||||||
1975
|
508
|
1995
|
663
| 2014/15 | 518 | ||||||
1976
|
488
|
1996
|
584
| 2015/16 | |||||||
1977
|
418
|
1997
|
650
| ||||||||
1978
|
471
|
1998
|
629
| ||||||||
1979
|
546
|
1999
|
760
Homicide statistics.
Please note that capital punishment ended in 1964.
The upward trend is unarguable.
|
Self explanatory title. I abhor that nicey nicey, politically correct, pseudo-Christianity which almost always supports leftwing attitudes - which in most cases are profoundly anti-Gospel. This Blog supports persecuted Christians. This Blog exposes cults. This Blog opposes junk science. UPDATED DAILY. This is not a forum. This Blog supports truly Christian websites and aids their efforts. It is hardhitting and unashamedly evangelical so if it offends - please do not come to this site!
Monday, April 02, 2018
Sunday, April 01, 2018
“WE DON’T DO ‘GOD’ … “ PART TWO.
“WE DON’T DO ‘GOD’ … “ PART TWO.
Posted by Vivian Evans, Ukip. Apr 1, 2018 .
Today is Easter Sunday, the most holy Feast Day for Christians across the world, a day when millions of Christians ‘do God’ and those who don’t enjoy the extra Bank Holiday tomorrow anyway. Picking up from Part One published yesterday, I’ll illustrate with a few points why I believe this attitude of not ‘doing God’ is pernicious.
Today is Easter Sunday, the most holy Feast Day for Christians across the world, a day when millions of Christians ‘do God’ and those who don’t enjoy the extra Bank Holiday tomorrow anyway. Picking up from Part One published yesterday, I’ll illustrate with a few points why I believe this attitude of not ‘doing God’ is pernicious.
One point is that the long-term effect of the secularisation and de-Christianisation of our culture which has culminated in the “We don’t do God” means that we cannot answer when a faithful muslim asks what do we do instead if we ‘don’t do God’? Law and order? Islam has it. Welfare? Islam does it. Study? Islam does it provided it’s only learning the quran by heart, and giving dawa to infidels.
What do people answer when confronted with the old whataboutism of the bloody Crusaders against peaceful islam? Do they even know about the physical destruction of the Coptic Christians by islam, still ongoing after 1400 years? Of the eradication of Christians in the Middle East, now Turkey, Syria, Lebanon? It’s only very recently that the persecution of Christians in islamic states has been deemed worthy of the odd report in the MSM.
Our intellectuals, so quick in slapping a bible quote on the table, don’t even know the difference between the Old Testament and the New Testament. So why should they bother to learn about the history of early Christianity? As far as they are concerned, the difference between the OT and NT doesn’t matter, and the quran is just ‘culturally different’, thus as irrelevant to modern life as the Bible and therefore nothing to do with us – because “we don’t do God”.
That attitude has now become so commonplace, this ignorance has now become so widespread that we, or rather they, have nothing to confront islam with. We will assuredly lose – unless we actually step up and confront CofE bishops, journalists, politicians, atheist professors and indeed all who declare that ‘forcing your religion down my throat’ is unacceptable as long as that religious symbol is the Cross.
They are conspicuously silent when islam is forced down our throats in the streets of our towns and cities. Left-wing ‘politicians’ are especially quick to hide behind a spurious moral superiority whenever someone dares protest against grooming gangs, sniffily declaring that this is only ‘politicising’ the suffering of the many. That they have stood aside and let this suffering happen is neither here nor there, as far as they are concerned.
There are other consequences of not ‘doing God’. The most glaring one is that our not-God-doing political leaders and their helpers in the MSM simply assume, from their great intellectual height, that nobody else they come in contact with could possibly ‘do God’. Thus, they simply are blind to the fact that islam very much ‘does Allah’.
Even worse, they think that offending Christians is negligible – they should get a thicker skin. But offending that religion of peas – that is racism and must therefore be eradicated, with blasphemy laws they’d scream against from the rooftops were the religion demanding such laws Christianity.
Still worse is the mutation of blasphemy laws into the catch-all of “Hate Speech” legislation which seems to be the only crime our police forces can prosecute nowadays. Isn’t it astonishing that those hate-speech prosecutions only ever seem to be brought against those who criticise islam, but never against those who attack Christians …
The worst consequence however is that this ‘not-doing-God’ has led the Labour Party into the morass of blatant anti-semitism, which is better called Jew Hate. For example, we read that Labour quietly reinstated six councillors who had been suspended because of anti-semitism.
If you see the names of those councillors, you can draw your own conclusions as to why they are Jew-haters. But then again, that is what their holy book demands they do. However, when one ‘doesn’t do God’ oneself then one assumes that e.g. all one’s party’s comrades also can’t possibly ‘do God’ either, doesn’t one!
This ‘culture’ which has given us Hate Speech while it promotes anti-semitism bears the most astonishing fruit. For example, the prominent Labour Politician David Lammy accuses Leave.EU of hate speech for a tweet – you have to read the whole report to get the full flavour of this warped mindset …
Obviously, he and his comrades don’t even notice this contradiction: one cannot equate criticism of islam with racism and therefore use hate speech legislation to eradicate it while at the same time give rein to anti-semitism, i.e. Jew Hate, which is actually racism pure, and demand hate-speech prosecution for those criticising anti-semitism.
That is where ‘not doing God’ leads in the end: based on a world view of ‘enlightened’ metropolitan, anything-goes attitudes, these proponents assume that all other people they know share their view and thus assume furthermore that those islamists they know must share the same attitude towards their own religion. Therefore, as far as they are concerned, islam can be disregarded unless it must be ‘defended’ against racists or explained away as ‘culturally different’.
Does this mean we must now all ‘do God’? I wouldn’t dare to be so presumptuous as to prescribe that, especially not given the state the Church of England is in. But I would suggest, with all due respect, that it wouldn’t hurt to read the New Testament. After all, if one can study the quran and the hadiths to learn what islam is really about, one can perhaps find the time to study the foundations of Christianity on which our history, our own culture, is based.
A Happy Easter Sunday to you all!
Free Speech In Universities - PLEASE!
Tim Dieppe comments on the report on Freedom of Speech in Universities which was issued by The Joint Committee on Human Rights this week.
The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) published a report on Freedom of Speech in Universities this week. The report highlights serious concerns over barriers to free speech and calls on the government and universities and students to take action.
The Committee is made up of MPs and Peers and is chaired by Harriet Harman MP. Christian Concern submitted written evidence to the inquiry which highlighted some of our cases and the status of the law.
The importance of free speech
The report clarifies that the law protects free speech, even when what is said may disturb or upset others. There are limits to free speech in law which prohibits speech which incites murder, violence or terrorism; stirs up racial hatred, or hatred to other groups; causes fear of violence, alarm or distress, constitutes harassment or is defamatory or malicious. The report recognises that free speech is foundational for a functioning democracy, and particularly important in universities where learning is advanced through dialogue and debate, and where there should be academic freedom.
Free speech is being inhibited
The JCHR inquiry found that free speech is being limited in universities due to a number of factors. These include intolerant attitudes, incidents of intimidatory behaviour, regulatory complexity, and fear and confusion about the Prevent duty.
Contentious issues are where emotions run highest and where free speech is more likely to be restricted. The report highlights that such issues include pro-life or anti-abortion views, transgender issues, Islamophobia, and secular criticism of religion.
Examples include the disruption of a pro-life event at Oxford University
A number of specific incidents are referenced in the report, including the recent attempt to ban the Christian Union at Balliol College, Oxford, from exhibiting at the freshers fair. Another incident highlighted was the disruption of an event organised by the Oxford Students for Life society. The disruption prevented the speakers from being heard for around 40 minutes and police had to be called to restore order.
Another incident discussed is the violent disruption of an event at Kings College Londonearlier this month where masked protestors stormed into the meeting, knocking a security guard unconscious and injuring a number of other staff and students in the process. They grabbed the microphone and used smoke bombs which triggered the fire alarm resulting in an evacuation of the building.
Student expelled for expressing biblical views
Disappointingly, the report makes no mention of the case of Felix Ngole which we highlighted in our submission to the inquiry. Mr Ngole was expelled from Sheffield University for his posts on Facebook in support of a biblical view of marriage. As Ipreviously commented, it is extraordinary that a British university would consider it within their remit to ‘investigate’ social media posts. The University takes the view that expressing biblical views should be a bar from pursuing certain careers. This is an astonishing infringement of free speech that must be addressed.
Another case that we mentioned in our submission to the inquiry is that of Edward Phelan, also from the University of Sheffield. Mr Phelan was not allowed to pursue an academic paper of his choice because it had Christian elements in it. He also received personalised marking feedback criticising his Christian faith.
The best way to defeat error is with truth
Free speech is a precious freedom that people in precious generations have given their lives to defend. It is absolutely essential to have free speech in order for a democracy to be able to function properly. Furthermore, being able to express yourself is part of what it means to be human. We can’t really be ourselves if we are not free to say what we think.
In the end, truth will defeat error. The best way to challenge bad ideas is with good ideas. Banning certain ideas or people from speaking tends to be counterproductive in that it may cause people to think that these ideas or people are unanswerable. False ideas should be challenged in open debate and dialogue without fear of intimidation or being accused of some kind of ‘hate speech’ for robustly critiquing opposing views. The Bible instructs us to “demolish arguments” (2 Corinthians 10:5). Both Jesus and Paul engaged in robust debate which offended others.
Jesus died for free speech
As we celebrate Easter this weekend, it is worth remembering that Jesus was crucified because of what he said, not because of anything else he had done. In his trial before the high priest he was falsely condemned for blasphemy. In his trial before Pilate the accusation was about him claiming to be a King. Jesus said to Pilate:
“For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.” (John 18:37)
In a sense then, it is true to say that Jesus died for exercising free speech.
We are called to speak the truth
We too are called to bear witness to the truth. The truth that Jesus died for our sins and rose again. The truth that he is the only way to God. The truth about marriage and sexual ethics. The truth about sex and gender. The truth about other religions. Such truths are sometimes unpopular, sometimes regarded as offensive, and sometimes lead to oppression or persecution. Nevertheless, it is the truth that we must stand for, and the truth that sets people free and that will win in the end.
How committed are you to speaking the truth? It may cost you your job, your university place, or your freedom? What we need now is a generation of Christians who are radically committed to speaking the truth in loving and caring ways, but without compromise. The freedom of the gospel is at stake.
Links:
Christian Concern written evidence to the JCHR Inquiry into Freedom of Speech in Universities.http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/human-rights-committee/freedom-of-speech-in-universities/written/75709.html#_ftn5
Christian Concern: The Case of the Politically Incorrect Studenthttp://www.christianconcern.com/our-concerns/education/the-case-of-the-politically-incorrect-student
JCHR Freedom of Speech in Universities inquiry.https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/human-rights-committee/inquiries/parliament-2017/inquiry/
"We Don't Do God." BRILLIANT!

Today is the day ‘in between’, between the two most important
days in the Christian Calendar. It is, I believe, a most suitable
time to look in more depth at this statement by Alastair Campbell.
For many people, his pithy words to Tony Blair, that “we don’t do God”,
were simply a proper expression of how politicians in our secular
society should behave. That they were a cynical bit of advice to his
leader who loudly and publicly did ‘do God’ after he resigned as PM
is indisputable.
What this sentence shows is that for a generation Christianity has been
deemed to be obsolete: for our opinion makers, for the Chatterati
governing the MSM, the establishment and especially our educational
system. For them, it is chic to be an atheist, or at the very least an
agnostic. One couldn’t possibly be ‘progressive’ if one were a Christian.
The many comment posts under any opinion piece in our MSM show how
deep-rooted this viewpoint has become in our society.
But there is a very dark side to this now so pervasive attitude, a dark side
which heavily influences our debate on islam which I shall address in
more detail in Part Two tomorrow.
One manifestation of this dark side is the utterly devastating scandal is
the shameful evidence, over decades, of the failure of our governments
to address the grooming gangs in our cities: we all know the names of
the towns and cities, truly a list of horror and shame for anyone
connected to the police, the judiciary, the local councils, the social services.
Perhaps though it is too facile to blame it simply on Political
Correctness, on Common Purpose acolytes: yes, they were and are at the
sharp end and did nothing – but that PC, Common Purpose, that the
false public god of ‘diversity’ were able to take over the political culture
so easily might perhaps have had something to do with not ‘doing God’.
Perhaps, one might surmise, the generation creating PC, secularism,
atheism, were exposed to too much ‘doing God’ in their youth. I’m sure
many remember how on Sundays nothing at all happened. No cinema,
no theatre, no sports, only ‘good’ music on the radio – and of course
everyone had to go to church to be preached at. No wonder the young
rebelled against these restrictions after the war – but perhaps they
threw the baby out with the bathwater.
Early representatives of virtue-signalling found their way into the
Labour Party and changed it. If one didn’t want to be called ‘racist’
one had to be for ‘diversity’. If one didn’t want to be called ‘God-botherer’,
one had to support all those shiny new things like being pro-gay,
pro-abortion, pro-feminism in its strident form, even pro-pedophilia,
as is rumoured about some Labour ladies.
And one had to be, of course, against the family – that horrible,
suffocating, monstrous instrument of suppressing ‘free spirits’ and
‘brainwashing children’ into the Christian Faith. Care for children,
for the elderly: hadn’t Labour promised to do this, with the NHS
trumpeted as being there ‘from cradle to grave’? It just needed
more money, the rich just needed to be taxed until the pips squeaked,
and people from all over the world would come and do the work – with
the desirable by-product of ‘rubbing the noses of the Tories’ into ‘diversity’.
Over fifty years ago, when Germany took in ‘gastarbeiter’ (guest workers)
from Turkey, the German writer Max Frisch wrote “we called for workers
– and human beings came”. That sounds quaint now. Today, we can state
that in Labour’s disastrous attempt to make our country more diverse,
they called for ‘differently coloured people’ – and islam came. We all
know the consequences and are living with them.
The dark side of ‘not doing God’ is our inability to confront islam.
Many of us have studied it over the years, and many others are set to
enlighten us even more. They work hard to stem the flood of
islamification by making people aware. However, it is my opinion
that their proposed solutions are bound to fail because too
many people are not interested. Far too many people have bought
fully into the “we don’t do God” mantra – even the Church of England
and their bishops. How else can it be possible that, as happened last
year, bishops allow quran verses be read from the pulpit of a cathedral?
Don’t they know anything at all about that so-called ‘religion’, about its
sly and later bloody way of conquest?
But what can one expect from a generation grown up under
an ever more ‘enlightened’ public life where Christian feasts
have become mass marketing events, where even the names
of those feasts are scratched out so as ‘not to offend’? Eid and
Divali are ‘celebrated’ more fervently by our politicians than
Easter, and no politician would dare to suggest a more ‘inclusive’
name for those feasts so as not to offend Christians!
In the public mind, Easter, the foundation of Christianity, has
become just another day for eating chocolates and going to the
sales. Moreover, even bishops, never mind politicians, are now
pondering to institute a fixed date for the Easter Holidays so that
businesses and industry can plan ahead in our Globalised “culture”.
You won’t find those politicians calling for a fixed time period
for Ramadan …
Ukip Daily.
Gender Pay Gap.
Britain's biggest companies have less than a week to publish their gender pay gap figures, but just over two-thirds of companies have done so.
With days to go until the 4 April deadline, over 6,000 companies have disclosed the difference between what they pay male and female employees.
Companies who fail to provide their data by next week will face legal action, the government has confirmed.
Regular readers of this Blog will know that I am 100% in favour of equitable and evenhanded behaviour when dealing with employment matters.
Personally, I believe that there will be few, clearcut situations where women are being paid less than men - where identical circumstances obtain. Far too often, the career interrupted by years of childcare is not brokered into the situation.
It is manifestly wrong for male employees to suffer because of a colleague's absences to start a family.
Where matters are indeed equal - it is right that firms are taken to task if women are not receiving the same salary as men doing the same work!
After all - in a fair society - does it really need to be the woman staying at home for dealing with children in their early years, in any case?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Envy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXFbVe_7Kt4





