Rowan has lost the plot.

That rather silly man who is our wretched Archbishop of Canterbury accepts that some Sharia law here is 'inevitable'.
Not satisfied with this ridiculous stance, he went on to say "We have to face the fact that some citizens do not relate to the British legal system."
Well. Neither do criminals and it is only the liberal left who want to accommodate their 'finer feelings'!
The solution for such outcasts is to accept our laws or go elsewhere. If you choose to stay - then expect any lawlessness to be spent peering through barred windows! [Of course, I am aware that the current powers would never embrace such an obvious remedy!]
When are people going to wake up to the fact that the liberal left are not just a source of tedious annoyance but are actually sinister and profoundly dangerous?

LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512876&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

Feminist hatred.

Over years I have heard a great many women who were clearly NOT feminists describe themselves thus.


Usually, these have believed in equality and were really nice people, in which case, they could hardly be described as feminist as this is essentially a doctrine of the purest hatred and utterly inappropriate in the Christian Church. [Inevitably, it is heavily represented in the liberal church!]

The purest of feminism - clearly, there are degrees - requires a hatred of mankind, a dedication to unfairness, being prepared to see social decay because of their 'ideals' and almost inevitably, a leftwing starting point.


I shall invite you to prove this point for yourself. Try to get hold of any strident piece of feminist writing and then do a little substituting.


Replace 'man' with 'woman' and vice verca, 'he' to 'she' etc.


Now read the piece and ask if you, particularly if male, would be allowed to make any of these statements in your workplace without getting sacked for being sexist.


'Sexism', like 'racism' is a one way street and may never be used both ways.


If you employ this trick, you will be genuinely horrified by what you read and will quickly recognise that the stereotyping which is revealed and has gradually been slipped under our guard.


Ladies - please strive for equality where still necessary but please never link yourselves with these appalling harridans of dissension and hatred.

What a daft question.

Dim question.

The answer is GOD.

Skunk.

Even more evidence has emerged to show that this idiotic government was so badly wrong in its attitude to cannabis!

LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512392&in_page_id=1770

When to discriminate.

The word 'discriminate' is always presented as a negative. Certainly, in most cases that will be true.
However, if for example somebody bravely dares to criticise single motherhood - there will be a barrage of attacks and ultra defensive posturing. There will be letters in the press stating "My husband died in an accident....." - "I was abandoned by my husband of 11 years, leaving me alone with..." etc. Such genuine instances are simply not relevant to the issue.
Clearly, those who state opposion to single motherhood are opposing those who deliberately get pregnant to create a benefits lifestyle; those whose promiscuity has led to the situation; those who have taken risks for their own gratification and then expect society to bankroll the consequences of their behaviour.
There are massive distinctions to be made. By not discriminating, we are actually being unjust to those who are true victims and to those who are socially responsible.
Sickeningly, I have even heard apologists for these admittedly tragic women, claim the Virgin Mary as 'a single mother'. [?????] There is a deliberate movement to abolish the concept of 'shame'.
Even though I am personally against the choice to become a single mother when somebody can afford to support their child themselves, in today's society, one must accept that there is a major difference with that particular, disagreeable scenario.
Blame MUST be apportioned but only where necessary. Only the innocent victims deserve total support from the state. For those who do not fall into this category, support from their family and the father of the child should be primary and state help should be via hostels rather than by the award of a council flat and a decent lifestyle as an umerited prize for their irresponsible behaviour.
In other words, the present incentives to get pregnant or be careless, must be removed.
In order to avoid even more abortions, a system needs to be established which allows for much easier adoption from such young women.
Harsh? - Not really. Harsher than the failing system we currently endure with all of its expense, pressure on the housing market and extreme social problems? - Undoubtedly. But society would begin to improve immediately and the benefits would accrue over less than a decade.
This is a classic case of 'do-gooder' thinking. The more support you give under the present setup, the worse the problem becomes - and ultimately society pays a greater price than the financial costs.
Discrimination can have positive outcomes.

Police red tape.

"Police red tape hits SIX MILLION HOURS per year. "

Well, you had known all about that from this Blog, of course. Now you have the stats to accompany the fact!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512551&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

EU federalism.

The ambitions of the UK's political elite to commit the nation to the unfettered federalism of the European Union are wrongly dated by many EU-realists to the treachery and lies of PM Edward Heath, and to a lesser extent PM Harold Wilson in 1975, when both cynically lied to the electorate - without which mendacity they could not possibly have gained their desired result in the referendum on membership.Shortly before his death - "Mr Heath, did you always know that this was to be a federal union? " - "Of course I bloody did." - {Liar Heath!}
These deceits predate this appalling pair. Any serious research into the history of the time reveals that PM Macmillan was prepared to deceive both the cabinet and the electorate as early as April 1961 as to the supranationalist intentions of the misleadingly named, Common Market.
Of course the lying by omission predates Macmillan. The full scale of the deviousness of the appalling Monnet and Spaak cannot be over emphasised. Research into this is rewarding but will make a fairminded person's knuckles go white.

Recommended. 'The Great Deception' by Chris Booker & Richard North - available 2nd hand on Amazon!

The excellent Judge Goldsack.

As a Magistrate qualified to sit as a judge in Crown Court, I once was privileged to sit with Judge Goldsack and it is no surprise to me that there has been an outburst and plea from him for common sense. He attacks 'guidelines' which have been a frequent target for me on this Blog.

"A judge yesterday attacked rules which prevented him from banning one of Britain's worst drivers from the roads for life.....Many of his crimes resulted in high-speed police chases as he tried to evade capture and he put other drivers and pedestrians in serious danger, a court heard. Judge Alan Goldsack, QC, said it was only a matter of time before Stevenson killed someone and it was 'pure chance' he had not already done so."

LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?
in_article_id=512421&in_page_id=1770


Photo: Stevenson.

Scandal? - What scandal?

An MP has apparently been bugged when conversing with an imprisoned terror suspect.
So. Sadiq Khan is a Muslim - insufficient grounds in itself to 'bug' conversations but nonetheless, member of an ethnic group which has revealed massive and frightening levels of support for terrorist activities in various polls in the last year.
Secondly, the suspect, Babar Ahmad, is a personal friend. It would therefore be most remiss of the security services NOT to be monitoring him closely.
Thirdly, there are grounds for even greater suspicion when we find that the MP is a so-called Human Rights Lawyer with a history of support for such people. Lawyers of his type are seldom on the side of 'the good guys'.
"The fact that Mr Khan also has a history of having been a legal thorn in the side of the police establishment - and, in particular, senior anti-terrorist officers - adds piquancy to the scandal."
Scandal?
Mr Khan may well be the muslim moderate which he portrays himself to be - in which case, I am genuinely sorry that this has happened. But what about you? -

Okay. If YOU had been in charge of an anti-terror unit - what would your decision have been?

LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512329&in_page_id=1770

One law for.....

"A judge convicted of harassment was yesterday allowed to keep his identity a secret after a court ruled making it public could harm his family.
The man, a part-time judge and distinguished barrister, cannot be named even though he was found guilty of a criminal offence."

LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512283&in_page_id=1770

*** 9th February. This judge has now been 'outed'. He is black. I so detest racism but why do I feel here that his colour may have been an issue? - The answer is of course, that our liberal elite are masters of the double standard and so in any such situation, what else can you be other than suspicious?

From whence cometh my help.

"The Lord is my strength and my song. He has become my salvation."

Exodus 15 verse: 2.

Tribalism.

Tribalism, not racism is the greatest danger to society. Follow the link below to see what this is doing in Kenya as it has done in India, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe and countless more!
The UK has 'imported' many other tribes over 5 decades. Not very bright, was it?



LINK:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=512118&in_page_id=1811

Police prosecutions.

I am struggling to believe it. A piece of total common sense from the tories!
'Police could be given back the power to decide whether to charge an offender under reforms announced by the Tories yesterday. David Davis said he would restore discretion for sergeants to take action on summary offences. He claimed it would save up to a million hours of police time a year and allow officers back on the beat by cutting paperwork. The Shadow Home Secretary said: "We will restore government's trust in the professional police officer and allow officers to refocus on fighting crime." He said police should be allow to decide whether a prosecution should go ahead on crimes usually heard in a magistrates' court.
The 2003 Criminal Justice Act stripped police of their discretion and left it to the Crown Prosecution Service to decide whether to charge. '
This would remove an entire idiotic layer from the system. The Crown Prosecution Service should only have a function with indictable or 'either way' [ie. more serious] offences.
Of course, it is all just too sensible. It is pie-in-the-sky. Reasons will be found in power for this eminently sensible suggestion to be be ultimately rejected by any future tory government.

LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512031&in_page_id=1770

Polygamy.

"Husbands living in a "harem" with multiple wives have been cleared to claim state benefits for all their different partners.
A Muslim man with four spouses - which is permitted under Islamic law - could receive £10,000 a year in income support alone.
He could also be entitled to more generous housing and council tax benefit, to reflect the fact his household needs a bigger property."
It is a long time since I used the expression. It must now be dusted off as

"THE LUNATICS REALLY HAVE TAKEN OVER THE ASYLUM!

Who benefits?

"One in five welfare claimants fails to show up for a mandatory review of their benefits."
I want to know whether any such unexplained avoidance, without a medical certificate, results in an instant and automatic loss of benefits - and if not, why not?

Those of us forced to work to support ourselves have the right to know that all claimants, whose benefits we underwrite, are indeed genuine.


LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512093&in_page_id=1770

Grammar schools again under attack.

Until the the fully blown onset of political correctness, it was possible to argue that Labour's visceral hatred for grammar schools was the most socially damaging policy they ever undertook.
The arguments used were either weak or spurious. When the weak arguments were examined, the criticisms were easily solvable without the destruction of an entire system.
"Some areas have more grammar school places than others" or "Secondary moderns do not have equivalent funding." Easily sorted.
Ironically, it was Labour who had offered working class children the opportunity to better themselves with their solid support of Butler's pivotal 1944 Education Act.
Suddenly it seemed, their profound class hatred kicked in and they insisted on a marxist-style egalitarianism instead which gave rise to the lamentable comprehensive system of today.
Labour has again turned its spiteful eye towards the remaining 164 grammar schools. [It is ironic that the ever leftwing LSE has produced a damning report which shows social mobility at its lowest in generations.]
Education policy should never be governed by malice!



LINKS: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=512156&in_page_id=1772&in_author_id=255
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/pressAndInformationOffice/newsAndEvents/
archives/2005/LSE_SuttonTrust_report.htm
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/pressAndInformationOffice/staffStudentsAndAlumni/dailyHeadlines/24-05-05.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=346152&in_page_id=1770
http://www.civitas.org.uk/blog/2005/04/the_ladder_of_opportunity.html

Abortion holocaust!

"A total of 66 infants survived NHS termination attempts in one year alone, it emerged.
Rather than dying at birth as was intended, they were able to breathe unaided. About half were alive for an hour, while one survived ten hours. "



I feel physically sick! I do not know how I can root out from within me the sheer hatred and detestation I have towards those people who support this unmitigated evil.




Please God, help me!

Honour killing.

Teachers, police and councils are afraid to take action against so-called honour crimes for fear of being accused of racism, it is claimed.








LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512157&in_page_id=1770

Lib Dems cannot be trusted.

When questioned about giving support to an attempt to bring about a referendum on the EU Treaty and whether the Lib Dems would allow the Commons to vote through a referendum by abstaining, Nick Clegg replied: "I certainly hope not. No."
I once voted LibDem. Never again!
I only support parties which in their turn support democracy.

It only works one way.

US photographer sued for not covering lesbian ceremony.

A Christian photographer who refused to take photographs of a 'commitment ceremony' between two women is being sued in the United States under laws similar to the UK's sexual orientation regulations on goods and services.

Respect for others as a two way street has never been their goal.
Lesbians MUST be respected as regards behaviour and feelings and are afforded 100% protection in law.

The PC police of the liberal left categorically refuse to allow any respect whatsoever to Christians and their views and feelings!

[It would be very interesting to know what logic they use to defend such appalling double standards.

Re-categorise cannabis!

A number of leading doctors have sent a recommendation to the government warning that cannabis must be regraded.
"Further impairment of the central nervous system is evidenced in the changed personality and declining academic performance, dependence, aggression, adversely affected driving and progression to other drugs...
...the regrading of cannabis would send strong signals, not only to the young people of Britain but all over the world, where other countries are watching our every move."


LINK://www.christian.org.uk/issues/2008/drugs/cannabis_29jan08.htm

Headline: how to fill prisons.

"Burglars and muggers facing short jail sentences to be let off with tags and community work."


LINK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=511499&in_page_id=1770