The fossils
were identified as Microcachrys because they have the same distinctive
square arrangement of leaves and the same waxy leaf cuticles as the living
plants. The living plants growing in Tasmania are named Microcachrys
tetragona. The researchers named the fossils Microcachrys
novae-zelandiae. Prior to this finding the fossil evidence for
microcachrys–like plants consisted of pollen grains in sediments from Tasmania,
Patagonia, southern Africa and Antarctica, indicating these plants were once
more widespread. Link: ABC
ED. COM. (Creation Research.) In spite of the different species name given to the New
Zealand fossil plant, the fact is, it was recognised because it had the same
structure as the living Australian plant. It brings to light a reminder that it
is the text book naming of species which gives rise to the origin of many
species and provides most evidence for their evolution. But this plant has not
evolved. This is why it is called a “living fossil,” a term was coined by
Charles Darwin to describe living things that were the same as their fossils.
But this means they haven’t evolved, and are no use to Darwin’s theory. Living
fossils are actually proof that living things have multiplied after their kind,
just as Genesis says. (Ref. botany, stasis) The most famous Australian living fossil is the Wollemi pine, supposedly unchanged for 65 million years, and there are numerous other lesser known examples. Over the years Creation Research has written about living fossils plants and animals from all over the world. Read about these in the article Living Fossils. Download PDF here.
Find out what the fossil record really shows us, with the Creation Research brochure Evidence from Fossils. Download PDF here.