These words were written by a 'warmist' in a vain attempt to rescue the ideal. Let us examine them:
1) 'Global warming' is now seldom attempted. The evidence of 14 years seems pretty conclusive against that so 'climate change' is used.
2) 'Climate change' cannot be attacked - as the climate is always in a state of flux.
3) By using the word 'potentially' - virtually any wild idea can be inserted.
4) Note the use of 'established fact' which, on a quick reading of the sentence implies that the 'warmists have science on their side' but do spot that it is really the 'potentially' which is 'established'.
