Thursday, April 21, 2022

Hmm.

 ho won Wednesday night’s debate between Emmanuel Macron and Marine 

Le Pen depends on who is doing the scoring. In the spin room and on the 

social networks, Team Macron claimed a victory for the President. With the

 second round of the presidential election on Sunday, my reaction is exactly 

the opposite.

Le Pen was not crushed as she was in 2017. In a way, she 

won by not being terrible, leaving Macron unable to 

administer a coup de grace to her candidacy. She got 

stronger and more confident as the evening wore on; he 

seemed to become more defensive.

To be generous, Macron was not on form. As the three-hour 

debate began, his voice seemed almost to break as he 

described his ambition for France. Sincerity? Or the 

bravado performance? It was a strangely emotional beginning.

The conflicts between the candidates were predictable as 

they ground their way through international affairs, the 

future of the French social model, the environment, economic

 competitiveness, youth, security and immigration, and 

finally France’s troubled state institutions. These topics

 producing forests of what the French call mots de bois.

 Wooden words. But among the branches, one could glean 

fundamental differences on Europe, where Le Pen remains

 a sceptic and Macron an obsessive.

How much attention the television audience paid to these details is itself debatable. But millions will have dutifully watched, and they might well believe that Marine Le Pen is less toxic than advertised. She’s not brilliant but not as much of an entitled dunce as I have previously considered. True, she’s longwinded; certainly not profound or mentally agile. But she had done her homework. She remained disciplined throughout. Macron was often characteristically patronising.

As the debate drew to a close, Le Pen was calm as Macron 

interrupted constantly and on several occasions the 

President’s voice again appeared close to breaking. It’s 

taken for granted that Macron is a master of his dossiers

 and the President’s performance wasn’t terrible. But this 

was not the rout of 2017. He jabbed, he feinted, but he 

never knocked Le Pen to the floor.

The debate will have been exhausting for the pair and 

certainly for the audience. But it reaffirmed that this election

 is much closer than in 2017, where Le Pen was humiliated

 by Macron in their head-to-head and went on to lose 

66 to 34 per cent in the voting that followed. Sunday's 

vote is likely to be far closer.

WRITTEN BYJonathan Miller

Jonathan Miller, who lives in Montpellier, is

 the author of ‘France, a Nation on the Verge of

 a Nervous Breakdown’ (Gibson Square). His 

Twitter handle is: @lefoudubaron



If Only I Could Disagree.

Nick Timothy Labour sees success and wants to tax it, not encourage more of it. Reeves and her party are takers not makers, destroyers not c...