BY KEVIN SHRUM, CHRISTIAN POST GUEST COLUMNIST
March
1, 2014|10:56
am
In
recent days much attention has been given to a new group of worshippers called
the "nones." The "nones" refer to the growing number of people who, when they
respond to any kind of census request or personal epistemological question, mark
"none" in reference to their religious affiliation. While "nones" represent a
wide variety of belief and practice, most generally affirm either an overt
atheistic or agnostic posture when it comes to the question of God.
"Nones"
are now worshipping together. These new "worship gathering" are not new.
Atheists and/or agnostics have been around since the beginning of time.
Gathering atheists are common as gathering storm clouds. "Nones" refuse to
accept any kind of rational, spiritual, or biblical argument for the existence
of God. Minimally speaking, some would say that I cannot know whether or not
there is a God – the agnostic. The more assured disbeliever would affirm there
is no God – the atheist.
I
would suggest that there are some basic questions every belief system must ask
and answer if that belief system is to be considered legitimate or sufficient. I
would also argue that the answers a person of faith offers to these questions,
in particular, the Christian worldview, answers these questions sufficiently and
consistently.
Question
One: Is there a God? This is the spiritual or eternal question. Put another way,
why won't the God question go away? (As Alister McGrath has argued in a book by
the same title) Is God the whimsical creation of a weak-minded people? Or, is
the affirmation of God's existence simply the implicit recognition of what is?
If there is a God, what is God like? What is God's nature? Is God the God of the
deists, detached and aloof? Is God the God of the atheists, unreal and created?
Or, is God personal and near, made known to us through the person of Jesus
Christ and the sacred texts? If there is no God, then what is my explanation for
ultimate reality? How did the world come to exist?
Science
affirms that something cannot come from nothing. They are left with the
unscientific response – "origins are a mystery." Origins are a mystery unless,
of course, there is a God who is able to create ex nihilo. Further, where does
meaning come from? Where does my sense of right and wrong come from? How do I
define justice, love, and mercy without slipping in a theistic argument for a
non-theistic position?
Question
Two: Who am I? This is the question of self-identity. Where did I come from? Am
I an accident? An incident? Or, do I have purpose, consciousness, and a sense of
a moral order? Where does self-awareness come from? Why do I feel an urge to
create, to pursue, to excel, to achieve? And why do I hold in my head and heart,
as C.S. Lewis would say, a yearning for something beyond myself, something
eternal? Where does moral order come from?
The
Christian would argue that mankind is made in the image of God and, though
marred by sin, has incredible capacities for creativity, mercy, love, justice,
and relationship; further, that God has set eternity in our hearts, a sort of
eternal GPS system. The atheist must argue that mankind is an evolutionary
by-product of a blind, cold universe controlled by chance and probabilities, but
no certainties. This means there is no eternal meaning to life; we are totally
this-worldly.
Question
Three: Who are you to me? This is the question of relationship. This question is
important. Christians do not argue that atheists do not love or care for friends
or family members. They do so in great degree. The question is why do they love,
care, have a sense of justice, feel moral outrage at wrongs committed, and have
a sense of right and wrong? Christians would argue that the relationships we
have with others reflect the relational character of God uniquely placed in the
heart of humanity. Atheists love and feel moral outrage, but to affirm this
outrage they must smuggle in an eternal meaning that they are unwilling to
openly acknowledge. Surely love is more than a set of chemical reactions set
within a biological explanation for all things?
If
we are nothing more than a higher order animal, as atheistic Darwinian
materialists argue, why are we surprised when we act like animals? Why do we
sense or feel meaning in relationships? The moral argument for God's existence
is not in and of itself sufficient for belief.
Question
Five: What happens when a person dies? This is the question of eternity. The
atheist must answer: 1) they do not know, 2) it doesn't matter, 3) or there's
nothing after death and this life is all there is. Yet, questions remain. Why do
we keep asking questions like: Is there a heaven? Is there a hell? Is there some
kind of judgment on committed wrongs? Why do I have a yearning for the necessity
of eternal justice? Where are my loved ones who have died? Why do I grieve when
someone dies? And why do I personally and individually continue to ask, either
privately or publicly, the questions of eternity, life after death, judgment,
and justice?
Death
is the sinister backdrop against which all of life is lived. We do not like to
think about death. Death is the irrefutable fact of life and what a person
thinks about death reveals much about how they view life. Death is the great
equalizer of life because young and old, rich and poor, educated and uneducated
all die. What matters is how you die and what happens to you after you die. I
have in my office a quote by the Greek philosopher Virgil that reminds me of my
human sinfulness and fragility: "Death plucks my ear and whispers, 'Live for I
am coming.'" Next to that quote I have this quote by Jesus (Jn. 11:25), "I am
the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall
he live."
These
questions are but five of a whole host of questions any belief system must ask
and answer. The concerning thing about modern-day atheism is not its existence,
but its shallowness. Again, atheism is not new. But one gets the sense that the
atheism of the current day is not dealing with the great questions of life and
death honestly and forthrightly; rather the new atheism seems to be the yearning
for humanity to be totally free from any temporal, external, objective, or
eternal explanations, restraints or accountability. Let me paraphrase who I
consider to be maybe the most honest atheist who ever lived, Friedrich
Nietzsche. He realized what was at stake if we turned our back on Ultimate
Reality. Paraphrasing Nietzsche he noted that if we have killed God, what are we
to do? Despair.
Dr.
Kevin Shrum has been in ministry for 29 years, currently pastors Inglewood
Baptist Church in Nashville, Tennessee, and is an Adjunct Professor of Theology
for Union University in Jackson, Tennessee.