Thursday, April 23, 2026

Racism of The Left.

Annabel Denham.

Shabana Mahmood has exposed the racism of the Left.

Ethnic minorities who stray from progressive narratives on immigration face swift and punitive responses from supposed allies

Shabana Mahmood
The Home Secretary has hit back at white liberals who try to put her ‘in a box’  Credit: Anadolu

The Home Secretary has hit back at white liberals who try to put her ‘in a box’  Credit: Anadolu

Shabana Mahmood has said the quiet part out loud. For months the Home Secretary has endured the insinuation she is betraying the Left-wing cause, not simply by calling for some control over our dysfunctional and widely abused immigration system but for doing so as a member of an ethnic minority.

Heckled this week for apparently attempting to “out-Reform Reform”, the Home Secretary finally snapped back. “I do think there is that element of [this criticism] which is: ‘How dare you, a brown woman, say a thing we white liberals think you’re not allowed to say?’”

Mahmood’s predecessor but three, Suella Braverman, recently told me that when she famously warned of an “invasion of the southern coast”, her Tory colleagues responded in Westminster’s usual fashion – by averting eyes and pretending not to hear. What Mahmood faces, as a Labour politician, might well be worse. In modern progressive politics there are approved positions, and approved people to hold them. Step outside your lane and the reaction will be both swift and unforgiving.

We’ve seen this dynamic before. When minorities stray from the prescribed narrative of oppression and disadvantage the response is rarely measured; it is immediate, and almost always punitive.

Suella Braverman
Suella Braverman said the country faced an ‘invasion’ from people travelling in small boats crossing the English Channel Credit: Paul Grover

Sir Trevor Phillips, former head of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and a veteran voice for reason in racial matters, raised concerns about integration and community cohesion, only to be suspended from the Labour Party. As chair of the Race and Ethnic Disparities Commission, the courageous Lord Sewell oversaw a report that concluded Britain was not structurally racist and was met with accusations ranging from naivety to something very like treason.

spoke to Tony Sewell earlier this month. Unfazed, he made a point that would propel some of the progressive commentariat into orbit: that many British Muslims would probably have voted for Margaret Thatcher. Family, aspiration, community, responsibility – these are not values held dear by white Britons alone. Yet parts of the Left still behave as though ethnic minorities must, by default, belong on “their side”.

Implicit in this is the patronising assumption that minorities are defined by disadvantage – and an intellectual laziness that reduces individuals to an often unwished-for group identity. The same shoddy group-think is now trying to impose the term “global majority”, lumping together Chinese, Bangladeshis, West Africans, Latin Americans and other wildly disparate individuals defined only by being non-white, and therefore having some form of victimhood in common.

But here’s the thing. If the country is no longer institutionally racist – though racism and racial disparities plainly still persist – what happens to the politics built around exposing it? Parts of the Left appear trapped in a kind of nostalgia, living in some romantic fantasy of structural oppression – a playground of goodies and baddies which bears little resemblance to the complexity of contemporary Britain.

Lord Sewell
Lord Sewell was criticised following his oversight of a report that concluded Britain was not structurally racist Credit: Rii Schroer

The result is distortion and caricature. Hence we’re warned that astrophysics is racist, along with the countryside and even niceness (“Black academics told being ‘nice’ perpetuates ‘white supremacy’”, read one recent headline).

This isn’t the only consequence. Judging by the number of times he’s labelled me a “fascist”, Zack Polanski appears to believe anyone who thinks annual net migration of 906,000 might be a tad high holds “extreme” views. The Left does this to silence dissent, yet remain curiously silent when genuinely offensive, conspiratorial opinions are expressed.

One Green Party candidate called David Lammy a “coconut”; another claimed that 9/11 “was done by the Zionists with Dick Cheney as their executing authority”. A third once posted on Instagram a picture of the Earth entangled in a giant, fang-toothed serpent with the Star of David printed on its skin. The caption? “It’s time to cut the head off this snake.”

MORE FROM ANNABEL DENHAM
Meanwhile, we regularly have to put up with anti-white language that would, if it were directed at other groups, be treated as “hate speech”. Think of the NHS trusts allegedly discriminating against white job applicants and our hopelessly depleted Armed Forces halting recruitment of white men in pursuit of “diversity” targets.
Worryingly, this re-racialisation of public life, and the slow erosion of our meritocracy, is being reframed as “progress”. Those who object are met with accusations of extremism, or the familiar charge of “out-Faraging Farage”. Yet such labels carry diminishing force in a political landscape where Reform consistently leads the polls. Britain’s “debates” about race and identity seem to be drifting ever further from reality.
DT.

Merry St George's Day.