Once again, he is interfering in matters he knows zilch about.
He wants to increase the number of people bailed from courts.
For once, The Magistrates Association is getting stroppy with the saddo. They at least, know that 'the likelihood of a custodial sentence' is not the criterion.
What about those with: a bad bail history, a tendency to flee, no fixed abode and ones who may interfere with witnesses to name but a few?