Before Barbara Castle interfered with the child benefits system, you had to CLAIM to receive it. The needy did so. This was no complex benefit - the very existence of which was unknown to ordinary people - it was claimed by those who needed it on lower incomes.
Making it a universal benefit caused bureaucratic mayhem - probably as intended.
Now, Financial Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke argues that this should be restricted to just the first two children and on our overcrowded islands and this is nothing less than common sense.
I must insist however, that for this to be fair, it would only apply to new claimants and those already carrying a child would also not be included. It would be wrong to remove the benefits in any manner other than gradually.
Self explanatory title. I abhor that nicey nicey, politically correct, pseudo-Christianity which almost always supports leftwing attitudes - which in most cases are profoundly anti-Gospel. This Blog supports persecuted Christians. This Blog exposes cults. This Blog opposes junk science. UPDATED DAILY. This is not a forum. This Blog supports truly Christian websites and aids their efforts. It is hardhitting and unashamedly evangelical so if it offends - please do not come to this site!
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Ah. Probably 'A Rightist Plot'.
Yobs up and down the country have clashed with riot police and hurled fireworks at emergency service workers, amid a sharp rise in Bonfire...
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-__pY6Dp5M FRAUD! Nothing less. EXPOSED!
-
Between spooky Dracula and a saintly woman who helped found Christianity in England: contradictions and contrasts at the seaside town of Whi...
-
Canteen worker at Dulwich College spared jail after sending 'depraved' child porn on the internet Paul Harding, 50, a catering ...