It
really did try oh-so-hard to undermine Nigel Farage. A pretty dismal outcome
though, wasn't it? Just following a non-too cuddly UKIP guy with a megaphone who
most would not want to vote for. Was he their first and only - or carefully selected?
Then, concentrating on Mr Farage's use of funds on UKIP's behalf, legally gained from the EU, which had nothing whatsoever to do with
them. Mr Farage's voting record was brought up in Brussels without mentioning
Cameron's vastly inferior record at Westminster.
It attacked UKIP for having to join up with parties that they did
not want to in order to form an EU grouping. Had they not done so - they would have
lost funds and influence. So, whose fault was that - Nigel's or the
EU with its wicked rules?
It attacked him with treacherous party members. UNBELIEVABLE that even Richard North was dragged up from
the depths of history - a man from Yorkshire of whom I have personal knowledge
and whose own failings are very well known to me.
Concentrating purely on negatives by non-stop use of his political
enemies, the programme was no more than BBC
BIAS at its brightest - and worst! They even used David Campbell-Bannerman who deserted the party as soon as he had failed in his own leadership bid! (Not exactly Carswellesque on the integrity front, in my humble opinion.)
Even the tone was appalling. Where was
the fairness of the Channel Four programme which had tailed Nigel for months and
concluded simply that 'what you see is what you
get?'
.jpeg)