https://www.twitch.tv/londonchessboxing
As reported regularly on this Blog, Ukip's MEP for the North-East, Jonathan Arnott is topping the bill at The York Hall, Bethnal Green in order to raise money for an important charity.
The above url may, I repeat may, be able to get you live coverage at around 9pm on Saturday.
Not given yet? - Please do so online!
Self explanatory title. I abhor that nicey nicey, politically correct, pseudo-Christianity which almost always supports leftwing attitudes - which in most cases are profoundly anti-Gospel. This Blog supports persecuted Christians. This Blog exposes cults. This Blog opposes junk science. UPDATED DAILY. This is not a forum. This Blog supports truly Christian websites and aids their efforts. It is hardhitting and unashamedly evangelical so if it offends - please do not come to this site!
Friday, March 31, 2017
Businesses To Fear Brexit - Why Would They?
Mrs May will have been encouraged by a report published today by the
think tank, Civitas, which says the cost of failing to strike a post-Brexit
trade deal with the European Union could be covered by tariffs on imports from
its remaining 27 members, meaning that British business need have little to fear
from EU tarrif barriers. It is a timely piece of good news for the Prime
Minister and vindicates her decision not to rush into what are complex
negotiations, the repercussions of which will have a lasting impact on this
country. There is much at stake and the challenge now for the Government is to
come up with a coherent strategy that is acceptable to our European neighbours
and, more importantly, good for British business.
Read more at: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/yp-comment-britain-s-brexit-opportunities-businesses-need-not-fear-tariffs-1-8323422
Read more at: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/yp-comment-britain-s-brexit-opportunities-businesses-need-not-fear-tariffs-1-8323422
Divorce.
Published:
January 6th, 2017
In this piece, Christian Concern's Communications Officer Camilla Olim
comments on news that married parents are more likely to stay together than
cohabiting ones, yet campaigners are calling for the introduction of 'online
divorce'.
She
highlights how 'online divorce' would pave the way to 'no-fault' divorce, as
society continues to ignore that marriage is proven to be best for human
flourishing. 'No-fault' divorce, she says, would be the "last nail in the
coffin" for the national honouring and upholding of
marriage.
This week, the Daily Mail reported figures showing that for the first time, break-ups
involving cohabiting parents have overtaken break-ups involving married
parents.
The figures, from the Office for National Statistics, showed that though
nearly four times as many parents with children are married rather than
cohabiting, 51.5% of those who broke-up last year were cohabitees. This compares
with 2006 when 45.3% of family breakdowns were cohabiting
couples.
It backs research by the Marriage Foundation: "Cohabiting
parents make up 19 per cent of all couples with dependent children, but account
for half of all family breakdown."
At the same time as this new evidence in favour of marriage is released,
plans are being made to introduce 'online divorce'. The
process, which would involve paying a mere £37 to fill out an online form, is
expected to be rolled out as a pilot scheme later this year. Campaigners claim
that this would save couples stress, time and paperwork. Although they have not
outright admitted as such, this move would pave the way to the eventual
introduction of 'no-fault' divorce. Only in November last year, 150 family
lawyers gathered in Parliament to lobby for
this.
So, as we are shown yet again that God's pattern for mankind is truly
good, campaigners are pushing for divorce to be made easier still. Mankind will
continue to stubbornly rebel, heedless of the evidence stacked against
him.
The cost of family breakdown is huge, as several studies have shown, but
society continues to ignore it or simply accept it, believing it to be
inevitable.
The Relationships Foundation, for
example, estimated that family breakdown cost the public purse £47 billion in
2015, the equivalent of £1,546 for every UK taxpayer.
Research carried out last year by the family lawyers' association Resolution indicated that divorce and family breakdown
makes young people more likely to experiment with drugs and alcohol, as well as
perform worse in GCSE and A-Level exams.
Despite these devastating facts, those pushing online divorce and indeed
'no-fault' divorce argue that the process should be made as smooth as
possible.
Under current law, couples have to state that a marriage has broken down
'irretrievably' when filing for divorce. They can only do so if one of the
following is established: Adultery, unreasonable behaviour, desertion or
separation. Couples will often cite 'unreasonable behaviour' as the closest
thing to 'no-fault' divorce, as the behaviours considered 'unreasonable' can be
extremely trivial.
Proponents of 'no-fault' divorce argue that it will allow couples to
split without the need for couples to accuse one another. But if so many couples
believe that their marriage has broken down irretrievably with 'no fault' on
either side, then the question has to be asked if it has really, truly broken
down with no hope of repair.
Perhaps, the reality is often this: It is not that husband or wife has
actively ruined the marriage, but rather the breakdown is a result of a lack of
action. It is common for couples to say that they simply 'fell out of love'. If
a house is neglected, it eventually falls apart. Marriage is supposed to take
work, and research shows that the effort pays off. For example, the Marriage
Foundation found last September that married couples who have occasional date
nights have 14% lower odds of breaking up.
Sir Paul Coleridge, Chairman of the Marriage Foundation, commented: "This
apparently light hearted piece of research highlights an essential truth about
the importance of maintaining a stable and healthy marriage especially where
there are children."
It is truly sad to think that many couples still vow to stay together
until 'death do us part', as they tie the knot, yet divorce violates those vows.
But to be able to exit a marriage on the internet; to be able to exit a marriage
despite no alleged fault on either side, would send a clear message that as a
society, we no longer value marriage – and by extension, the
family.
This devaluing began a long time ago, as we have slowly unravelled the
protections surrounding marriage- the decriminalisation of sexual acts between
same-sex couples in 1967, the Divorce Reform Act 1969, the Civil Partnership Act
2004, and the introduction of same-sex 'marriage' in 2014. 'No-fault' divorce
would be the last nail in the coffin when it comes to a national upholding and
honouring of marriage.
In Matthew 19, when Jesus was questioned by the Pharisees on whether it
was lawful to divorce "for
any and every reason", he told them that marriage, created by God, is
designed to last. And when they asked him why Moses permitted divorce, Jesus
answered by first pointing to the condition of the human heart: "Moses
permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was
not this way from the beginning."
God takes divorce seriously because marriage is not just a social
contract but a holy institution. Marriage is designed to bind two souls together
in a covenant relationship, and when that bond is broken it leaves mess and
brokenness. It leaves children to pay the heavy
price.
Society's relentless consumerism has infiltrated the way that we view
relationships. The prevalence of pornography and even the popularity of some
online dating apps like Tinder and Happn are symptoms of our desire for instant
self-gratification. We seek pleasure without commitment. We seek contact without
connection. As orphans estranged from their Father, our society's understanding
of love is tainted.
Is it any wonder, then, that campaigners are calling for online
divorce?
But that doesn't mean we should be silent about it. We know that marriage
is still proven to provide the best environment for human
flourishing.
As Christian Concern's Chief Executive Andrea Williams said during a Sky News debatethis week,
divorce is "tragic
for everyone when we consider just how important marriage is, how it's the
cornerstone of society. And how we should be doing all that we can to keep
marriages together, not to simplify the process for people parting from one
another."
The church needs to speak out, as it celebrates and promotes marriage, as
it stands with the married, the not-yet-married and the divorcees - who, like
us all, are in need of grace, of forgiveness and
healing.
Christian
Concern.
It Is A Crime To Throw Away Good Food Just Because Of A Date On The Packet.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4364968/Surprising-foods-eat-past-use-dates.html
As stated on this Blog previously, God gave us two eyes and a nose which covers 90%+ of any problems that might occur.
As stated on this Blog previously, God gave us two eyes and a nose which covers 90%+ of any problems that might occur.
Grammars: The Truth.
Grammars 'will stop poor, bright pupils earning less than rich, dim schoolmates': Education Secretary says selective schools will transform the lives of deprived children.
In other words - just like it used to be for me and my fellow pupils before the ignorant left put dogma ahead of common sense and went into destruction mode.
It wasn't broke - so why did they try to fix it?
Yes, there were some problems but these were far from difficult to overcome.
I Agree - But Only On Hand-Held Phones.
D
S Boyes, Upper Rodley, Leeds. Yorks Post.
ISN’T it time for more positive action by the Government to halt the
carnage on our roads caused by the distraction of mobile phones?
The suggestions of Chris Grayling, our wishy-washy Transport Secretary,
simply don’t go far enough. Use of a mobile phone while driving should be like
drink driving, an automatic ban for three months for first offence, increasing
on subsequent ones.
Once lauded as a useful business tool, these phones are a menace to road
safety, whether hand-held or hands-free.
I speak from years of experience as both an employed driver and as a
haulier, and know that there is nothing that takes your mind off safe driving
more than being berated by an irate boss, or a customer demanding a quote or a
supplier trying to sell you something not wanted or needed while you are
battling the M25 rush hour traffic.
Making or receiving calls or texts while at the wheel should be outlawed
with drivers having to pull over at the first safe place to stop before dealing
with them.
Voicemail would store up any outstanding ones.
Things are so out of hand that only a short sharp shock, as I suggest,
will make any difference.
UK Must Leave EU's Customs Union.
As the Prime Minister, Theresa May, prepares to trigger the
Article 50 EU exit mechanism this week, Open Europe has today published a new
report, ‘Nothing to declare: A plan for UK-EU trade outside the Customs
Union.’
The study concludes that leaving the EU’s Customs Union is the only logical step for the UK to pursue an independent trade policy and achieve a truly ‘Global Britain’ outside the EU. Open Europe assesses different models of collaboration outside a customs union, and argues that the UK and the EU should aim for full cooperation on the practicalities and administration of customs as part of a comprehensive UK-EU free trade deal.
Open Europe’s Policy Analyst, Aarti Shankar, said:
“We have looked at the evidence and at international examples, and conclude that leaving the EU’s Customs Union is the right decision for the UK. If the UK remained in the Customs Union after Brexit, it would not be able to meet the Government’s ambition of conducting an independent trade policy and achieving a truly ‘Global Britain’.
“There is a trade-off between minimising disruption to UK-EU trade and ensuring the UK is able to shape its own trade policy post-Brexit. Any model that keeps the UK ‘half-in’ the EU’s Customs Union would constrain its ability to strike trade deals across the world.
“The UK and the EU should aim for full customs cooperation as part of a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. This is perfectly achievable, and the EU already holds customs facilitation agreements with other trade partners, including Switzerland and Canada.” Open Europe.
The study concludes that leaving the EU’s Customs Union is the only logical step for the UK to pursue an independent trade policy and achieve a truly ‘Global Britain’ outside the EU. Open Europe assesses different models of collaboration outside a customs union, and argues that the UK and the EU should aim for full cooperation on the practicalities and administration of customs as part of a comprehensive UK-EU free trade deal.
Open Europe’s Policy Analyst, Aarti Shankar, said:
“We have looked at the evidence and at international examples, and conclude that leaving the EU’s Customs Union is the right decision for the UK. If the UK remained in the Customs Union after Brexit, it would not be able to meet the Government’s ambition of conducting an independent trade policy and achieving a truly ‘Global Britain’.
“There is a trade-off between minimising disruption to UK-EU trade and ensuring the UK is able to shape its own trade policy post-Brexit. Any model that keeps the UK ‘half-in’ the EU’s Customs Union would constrain its ability to strike trade deals across the world.
“The UK and the EU should aim for full customs cooperation as part of a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. This is perfectly achievable, and the EU already holds customs facilitation agreements with other trade partners, including Switzerland and Canada.” Open Europe.
Thursday, March 30, 2017
Key Question.
EG Moody, Scarborough.
I’D love to ask Tony Blair “If, as you claim, Brexit voters didn’t know
what they were voting for, how much did the anti-Brexit voters know?” Yorkshire Post.
Lingerie.
You won’t believe what one lingerie company is doing to show what makes a
woman truly beautiful. I’ve got a great story for you. Get a
hankie.
When it comes to lingerie companies, we’ve
gotten used to some pretty graphic ads. You know the kind I mean: ones that
feature impossibly perfect, airbrushed models wearing frilly and revealing
underwear.
But the other day I came across the most amazing lingerie ad I’ve ever
seen. No, I was not reading a Victoria’s Secret catalog. I was watching an
online ad created by the Thailand branch of Wacoal, a Japan-based lingerie
company. It was part of a three-part series called “Beauty Inside.” And it
magnificently depicts the true value of women.
The first ad opens with a married couple sitting nervously in their
doctor’s office, holding hands. “After trying so hard for many years, she
finally got pregnant,” the husband says. But today they’re getting some bad
news.
“I know it’s hard,” the doctor says sympathetically. “But please make a
decision as soon as possible.”
The couple, clearly stunned, drive home, hold one another, and
cry.
“On that day at the hospital,” the husband relates, “the doctor told us
that she’s got cancer. She has only two choices. First, she might be cured if
she took chemotherapy. But that may cause our child a disability. Or we might
lose our baby. The alternative is to keep our child. But she might have to fight
the cancer alone, without any remedy.”
The woman cries as her husband holds her. The next morning, she gets up
and walks to the living room, where the baby’s crib is still sitting on its box.
She runs her fingers along the crib and makes a decision: “I will do it for you,
baby.”
The mother begins putting the crib together and plays with a stuffed
animal, anticipating her child’s birth. Now she is back in the hospital, in
labor. When her doctor holds up her healthy baby, she cries with joy. After
cuddling and kissing her child, the mother hands him to her husband. She smiles
at her little family as a nurse takes her down the hall and into the
chemotherapy room.
These ads—which are both profoundly pro-women and pro-life—have become a
global phenomenon. Millions of people have watched them online. Clearly they’ve
hit a nerve—and I think I know why.
First, most lingerie ads focus on women’s bodies, suggesting that a
woman’s appearance is the most important thing about her. But these ads
challenge young women to value themselves in other ways: To celebrate strength
and sacrifice, courage and compassion.
They’re teaching women something else, as well: that a worthwhile man
will value them, not based on outer beauty, which is fleeting, but on inner
beauty, which is based on character. And when life throws them a curve ball—such
as cancer during a pregnancy—a strong man will help his wife through
it.
Finally, I believe modern young women may be getting tired of being
encouraged to take the easy way out when they run into a problem—such as a
problem pregnancy. Women are, I think, moved by the idea that self-sacrifice is
noble, and can be the source of great joy.
It’s hard to watch this ad without crying, especially when you find out
it was based on a true story. Whether it meant to or not, the Wacoal company
gives us a perfect illustration of 1 Corinthians 13:7: “Love bears all things,
believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.”
I hope you’ll watch these ads, and share them with your friends, sisters,
and daughters. Their positive messages will help cancel out the hundreds of
negative ones that bombard young women every day.
And you just might consider buying the woman in your life some lingerie,
not from Victoria’s Secret, but from the company that teaches that the value of women is in the nobility of their
character. Breakpoint.
EU Pretending To Demonstrate Unity.
With
the ceremonial signing of the Rome Declaration on Saturday (25 March), the
so-called Bratislava process designed to rethink the EU after the shocking
Brexit vote last year has come to an end.
The
result is a fragile display of unity, with simmering tensions and deep divisions
on policies among the member states.
Last September, the EU-27 held their first
soul-searching meeting in Bratislava in an effort to reconnect with
citizens and make the bloc more responsive to their needs and
concerns.
Migration, strengthening the EU’s external borders, deeper defence
cooperation, and the need to reinforce the European economy after the bruising
eurocrisis and subsequent austerity measures emerged as key points of
agreement.
The common objectives were designed to allow the bloc to “rebuild a sense
of political community”, European Council president Donald Tusk said at the
time.
Minimum agenda
There was of course a very tangible and pressing political need to show
unity after Brexit - that is not to be underestimated. The message was that
however unprecedented it was for a member state to leave the union, it would not
shake the bloc.
Therefore, the sheer show of unity is a result not to be downplayed
politically.
But there seems to be little more, for now, that leaders could
wholeheartedly agree on.
Already in Bratislava, the then Italian prime minister, Matteo Renzi,
embattled at home and needing to put up a fight, refused to hold a press
conference together with French president Francois Hollande and German
chancellor Angela Merkel. He said that the meeting was a waste of
time.
Renzi’s outburst might have been aimed more at Italian voters rather than
at the EU itself. Just like the
last-minute objections from Poland and Greece to the Rome Declaration last
week were more for internal consumption, it shows that leaders cannot be counted
on for not using the EU as punchbag, whenever it suits them
politically.
And that puts unity at risk. EU
Observer.
Just Look How Easily The 'Understanding' Of This Isue Is Blown Apart!
AUSSIE DINOS THE BIGGEST at least their tracks are,
according to reports in ABC News 21 & 27 March 2017, BBC News 27 March 2017,
and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,
doi:10.1080/02724634.2016.1269539 published online 24 March 2017. A team of
scientists from University of Queensland and James Cook University have mapped
out multiple dinosaur trackways on the coast of Western Australia, where they
found thousands of tracks at 48 sites on the Dampier Peninsula over 25 km
stretch of coastline. On the basis of previous reports of dinosaur tracks in
this region the researchers suggest track sites could be spread over more than
200 km (125 miles). The tracks are dated as Lower Cretaceous, 127 to 140 million
years ago. Steve Salisbury of University of Queensland, who led the study, told
the BBC “This is the most diverse dinosaur track fauna we’ve ever recorded”. He
went on to explain: “Twenty-one different types. There are about six different
types of tracks for meat-eating dinosaurs; about the same number for sauropod
dinosaurs; about four different types of ornithopod dinosaur tracks - so,
two-legged plant-eaters - and really exciting, I think, are six types of armored
dinosaur tracks, including stegosaurs, which we’ve never seen before in
Australia”. Some of the sauropod prints are the biggest ever found in the world.
One measured 1.7 metres (5ft 7in) long. The researchers estimate the dinosaur
that made it was 5.3 to 5.5 metres at the hip. Salisbury commented: “At first it
would seem a footprint that size and an animal that big, is it scientifically
possible? These animals did exist. They were out there and we’re seeing evidence
of them having existed in the Kimberley 130 million years ago based on these
tracks”. According to the ABC “The area was a large river delta 130 million
years ago, with dinosaurs crossing wet sandy areas between surrounding forested
areas”. Salisbury explained: “There are huge areas around that coastline where
all you can see are dinosaur tracks. They’ve just been churned up by dinosaurs,
the same as what you see around a dam when a lot of cattle and sheep and
kangaroos have come in and made a mess of the mud”. According to the ABC “The
heavy steps of more than twenty different types of dinosaur compressed the muddy
sand when dinosaurs wandered what was then a river plain in Gondwanaland, and
were preserved in what would later harden into rock”.
Links: ABC, BBC
ED. COM. To get fossil footprints preserved well enough for scientists to identify what kind of dinosaur made them takes more than just churned up mud waiting to harden into rock. Walking along a beach or through soggy mud will show you that in order to be preserved footprints need to be rapidly and deeply buried. If the scientists are correct in their estimate that the trackways extend over a region 200 km long, that is a lot of mud for dinosaurs to walk across, followed by a lot more mud to bury the tracks. This amount of rapidly deposited mud requires more than just normal tidal and estuarine flows. Mud layers that size with buried preserved prints require a massive, sudden flood. Perhaps we should try thinking Noah’s flood, not river delta? (Ref. fossilisation, trace fossils) Creation Research.
Links: ABC, BBC
ED. COM. To get fossil footprints preserved well enough for scientists to identify what kind of dinosaur made them takes more than just churned up mud waiting to harden into rock. Walking along a beach or through soggy mud will show you that in order to be preserved footprints need to be rapidly and deeply buried. If the scientists are correct in their estimate that the trackways extend over a region 200 km long, that is a lot of mud for dinosaurs to walk across, followed by a lot more mud to bury the tracks. This amount of rapidly deposited mud requires more than just normal tidal and estuarine flows. Mud layers that size with buried preserved prints require a massive, sudden flood. Perhaps we should try thinking Noah’s flood, not river delta? (Ref. fossilisation, trace fossils) Creation Research.
What Do All These Songs Have In Common?
Yesterday.
Bridge Over Troubled Waters.
Sailing.
My Way.
Bohemian Rhapsody?
Well. I generally like or dislike songs and that is it but the
quintet above are all ones which I loved when I first heard them - but now they
simply get on my nerves.
There are very few others on this list.
What about you?
Wednesday, March 29, 2017
Every Single One An Extremist And Anti-Democrat.
Thousands join London march demonstrating against leaving the EU.
Modesty In Clothing?
Modesty
in clothing is such a big issue in Christianity, but many believers are divided
about it. Men blame the women for their difficulties in the area of purity,
thanks to revealing clothes. On the other hand, women blame men for being
perverts who can't stop lusting after them. To be frank about it, both camps are
wrong. Why do I say that? Read on.
To my sisters
Ladies,
I am a married man who has seen beauty in the face of God, and in the face and
person of my wife. I want to ask you: Why wear revealing clothes anyway?
The
Bible tells us that we should put no confidence in the flesh (see Philippians
3:3-4). While we know Paul was saying not to trust the flesh when it comes to
salvation and the fight against sin, I want you, dear sisters, to consider it
this way as well: Maybe you shouldn't base your beauty on the responses you get
when people see your bare skin.
I've
seen a great deal of sisters in church wear clothes that would make the unsaved
think like Christian women aren't any different from non-Christian women. I've
heard the same Christian women say something like "God made you [beautiful/sexy] so flaunt
it." That couldn't be more carnal.
Ladies,
God made you to be holy, set apart, and precious in His sight (see 1 Timothy
2:8-10). You don't have to win people's attention by showing your skin. You
don't have to wear "adventurous" clothing that causes unrenewed men to lust
after you. You don't have to reveal your skin because culture dictates it. You
just have to know that God loves you, that He made you according to His design,
and that you don't have to get your confidence from the praise (or catcalls) you
get from people.
Receive
your security from the Lord. (see Psalm 16:2)
To my brothers
Gentlemen,
I am a man like you. I know that many of us struggle with our minds after we see
a scantily-clad woman, Christian or not. While not all men struggle in the area
of sexual purity, I know that a great many do, and I am here to encourage you:
We can overcome in Christ (see Romans 8:37).
Brothers,
we need to see our sisters in church as sisters. We need to love them as sisters
(see 1 Timothy 5:2). We must not lust after any woman, whether she's modestly
clothed or not (see Matthew 5:27-30). God gave us our eyes to see His face, not
ogle at a woman's body. God gave us our minds to think of what He wants, not to
imagine things too shameful to mention.
Men,
all who are in Christ are given the mind of Christ (see 1 Corinthians 2:16). We
are told, "be transformed by the renewing of your mind" through the Word of God,
not the patterns of the world (see Romans 12:2). We should see, think of, and
treat women the way Christ did. And yes, if you're married, your wife should be
the only beautiful woman in your sight.
Let
God be the beauty that you want to see (see Psalm 27:4).
Love you both
Brothers
and sisters, instead of bashing each other for causing one another to stumble,
let us do things that build up one another (see 1 Thessalonians 5:4-11).
Ladies,
help the men by wearing beauty of character instead of clothing that will tempt
men to think wrong of you. Real God-fearing men don't like seeing you revealing
your skin. Reserve your body for your husband or future husband instead.
Men,
treat the ladies with respect and encourage them to trust God for their beauty
by not lusting after them nor tolerating revealing clothes. Let them see that
God-fearing men value modesty in a world full of sensuality. Christian Today.
The Progressively Frightening Totalitarian and Judgmental Left.
The left has done a 180 since its free speech heyday of the 1960s.
What used to be anything goes, and protecting the First Amendment right to say
controversial things, has morphed into a treacherous map of what you can and
cannot say.
Universities, which were once a bastion of free speech, have now
become the most hostile areas of all. If you do not agree with the left — even
if you are on the left — expect to be savagely targeted. You could lose your
job, your career and reputation over just one social media post. Not to mention
being bombarded with vitriolic, threatening emails.
Left-wing comedians avoid performing comedy routines on
university campuses. Conservative speakers are violently stopped from speaking
engagements there.
Conservatives now walk on eggshells throughout society, just one
tweet away from having their lives destroyed. The rise of social media has made
it easy for the left to monitor everyone on the right. Since some successful
conservative pundits as well as anonymous social media accounts get away with
tweeting politically incorrect statements, others feel a false sense of comfort
in engaging similarly, sometimes merely retweeting the remarks. But the reality
is, for most of us, something you post could end up on the front page of the
newspaper the next day. The private comfort of your home where you post on
social media is deceptive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
God’s Love and Ours. 1 John 4.
God’s Love and Ours. 7) Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows G...
-
Franklin Graham preached in Glasgow, launches new fund to defend religious freedom in the UK. Staff writer Franklin Graham preaching at ...
-
https://www.christianpost.com/voices/marys-magnificat-the-wait-is-over.html