Enoch Powell’s historical reputation rests overwhelmingly on the “Rivers of Blood” speech, delivered in Birmingham on April 20, 1968. Critics and historians argue that the speech was deeply inflammatory, relying on racially charged anecdotes and predictions of apocalyptic violence. Conversely, his defenders at the time and in subsequent political debates argued that he was a principled parliamentarian who was giving voice to the genuine, unexpressed anxieties of his working-class constituents regarding rapid demographic changes.
Self explanatory title. I abhor that nicey nicey, politically correct, pseudo-Christianity which almost always supports leftwing attitudes - which in most cases are profoundly anti-Gospel. This Blog supports persecuted Christians. This Blog exposes cults. This Blog opposes junk science. UPDATED DAILY. This is not a forum. This Blog supports truly Christian websites and aids their efforts. It is hardhitting and unashamedly evangelical so if it offends - please do not come to this site!
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
Hmm. Enoch Powell Seems To Have Been Pretty Accurate.
The Arguments Condemning the Speech
Critics, including the Conservative party leader Edward Heath—who immediately sacked Powell from the shadow cabinet following the address—viewed his rhetoric as dangerous demagoguery. The primary criticisms center on several specific elements of his remarks.
-
More than 4,200 Christians killed in Nigeria this year - report . (Photo: Getty/iStock) More than 4,200 Christians have been killed in Ni...
-
https://www.aol.com/articles/us-monitoring-suspected-fatal-pneumonic-000559000.html