Tuesday, February 07, 2023

Lord Shaftesbury.

Lord Shaftesbury. 

Lord Shaftesbury was a Christian and a reformer, 
shunning high office to work tirelessly, improving 
the lives of the poor.
Anthony Ashley-Cooper, (Blogger: today, I have heard the great man's actual name for the first time ever!) the 7th Earl of Shaftesbury, was a politician, philanthropist and social and industrial reformer in 19th century England. He used his position as an MP and well-connected aristocrat to improve conditions for workers in factories, textile mills and mines. He also tackled child labour. He rejected the opportunity for high office which his connections created for him. Shaftesbury also championed education for poorer children, better conditions for people committed to lunatic asylums and better housing for the poor. He was a fiercely committed evangelical Christian on the conservative side of the Church of England. His devout faith in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ inspired his life of good works.
His devout faith in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ inspired his life of good works.
Early life – becoming Lord Ashley

Shaftesbury was born Anthony Ashley Cooper in London in April 1801. He was given the courtesy title of Lord Ashley at the age of 10 when his father became the 6th Earl of Shaftesbury. He succeeded him as 7th Earl when his father died in 1851. His mother, Anne, was also well-connected: she was the daughter of the Duke of Marlborough. The family estate was at Wimborne St Giles in Dorset. Shaftesbury’s childhood was unhappy. His parents were distant and harsh. His Christian faith was nurtured under the influence of the family’s housekeeper who read Bible verses to him and taught him prayers. Aged seven, he was sent to boarding school and from there to Harrow. He studied classics at Christ Church, Oxford.

In 1830 he married Lady Emily Cowper. They had six sons and four daughters. When his mother-in-law remarried it cemented his links to leading figures of the time: her new husband was the future Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston.

Early career in parliament – campaigning for mentally ill


As Lord Ashley, Shaftesbury became Conservative MP for Woodstock at 25. Later he represented Dorchester, Dorset and Bath. In his first significant speech, he called for changes to the care of mentally ill people. At the time, they were shut away in lunatic asylums in filthy, degrading conditions. Shaftesbury visited one in London to find the occupants all but naked, badly fed and spending long periods in chains. He became chairman of the Lunacy Commissioners and continued to press for reform. By 1845 he had pushed through legislation which treated the mentally ill as people needing care, rather than social outcasts.

Shaftesbury’s connections and rank in society gave him the opportunity to hold high political office. But although it was offered on several occasions Shaftesbury declined. His passion was to bring about social reform and he felt this was best done by holding a more independent political position. But his rank and influence meant he was consulted by Queen Victoria on occasions and asked by ministers to mediate when riots were brewing in 1848.
Continued below...
Christianity Lord Shaftesbury
Championing reforms in factories and mines

In the early 1830s there was growing unrest about the treatment of workers, particularly children, in mills and factories. Shaftesbury’s interest in this began after reading a report about child labour which left him ‘astonished and disgusted’. He later said he took up the cause after meditation and prayer. By 1833 he was leading the factory reform movement in parliament, pushing to have the working day in textile mills cut to 10 hours for women and children. Restrictions were put in place on children’s hours but there was strong opposition to reform among MPs and further progress was slow. Critics also accused Shaftesbury of ignorance about the real state of factories.

The Ten Hours Act finally became law in 1847, restricting the working time of women and adolescents. But on the ground, change did not always come and Shaftesbury kept up the pressure. In 1863 he produced a report showing that children as young as four were still working in factories from 6am to 10pm

Shaftesbury had quicker success in bringing about reform in the mines. In 1840 he helped set up the Children’s Employment Commission. Its first report on mines and collieries shocked society – most people were unaware that women and children worked underground. Shaftesbury had discovered that boys as young as four and five were being used. Shaftesbury’s Mines Act of 1842 banned all women, girls and boys under 10 from working underground.

He also campaigned against the use of small boys as chimney sweeps, becoming chairman of the Climbing Boys Society. A complete ban took decades of pressure but by 1875 he had helped introduce laws to regulate the trade.
In 1851 his Lodging House Act ensured licensing and inspection of lodgings. The Victorian author, Charles Dickens, called it ‘the best piece of legislation that ever proceeded from the English parliament’.
Education, housing and other reforms

Shaftesbury was out of parliament for 18 months in 1846-47. During that time, he visited London’s slums and became more convinced that the working classes needed better homes and their children needed schooling. For nearly 40 years Shaftesbury chaired the Ragged Schools Union, which provided free education for working class and destitute children. Over his time in post, it is estimated that the Union helped about 300,000 children. Shaftesbury was also involved in legislation to rehabilitate young offenders.

As a member of the General Board of Health, Shaftesbury turned his attention to public health, pushing through a number of reforms. He set up a sanitary commission for the Crimean War in the 1850s which saved many soldiers’ lives. And he called for the government to support cheap housing for urban workers and also to carry out regular checks on existing housing. In 1851 his Lodging House Act ensured licensing and inspection of lodgings. The Victorian author, Charles Dickens, called it ‘the best piece of legislation that ever proceeded from the English parliament’. Shaftesbury was one of group of reformers which included George Peabody, who pioneered social housing in Victorian England.

Works inspired by faith


Shaftesbury was an evangelical member of the Church of England. His Christian faith and understanding of the teachings of Jesus Christ inspired him to press for numerous social changes. He said God had called him to labour among the poor and felt sustained and comforted by his faith. He was president of the Bible Society for more than 30 years. He supported the Young Men’s Christian Association and financially backed a number of Christian missionary organisations. Christianity teaches that Jesus Christ will return again to earth and Shaftesbury was among those who felt this would happen soon. This gave an extra urgency to his work. Shaftesbury was an early supporter of the movement to establish a homeland for Jewish people in Palestine.

Final years


Shaftesbury’s 80th birthday was marked by a public celebration at the Guildhall in London, led by the Lord Mayor. In 1884 he was granted the Freedom of the City of London. Lord Shaftesbury died in Folkestone in October 1885 aged 84. His death provoked national grief at the loss of ‘the People’s Earl’. Crowds of people from parts of society he had championed lined the route of his funeral cortège to pay respects as it passed through London to Westminster Abbey.
Blogger: The 'Eros Statue' in Piccadilly Circus is a malicious misnomer. It is correctly named 'The Angel of Christian Charity.'

So Very Sad For Nicola.

A poll carried out by YouGov showed that the First Minister's personal approval rating has fallen below 4 per cent, hinting that nationalists are starting to question her position. Mail.

Monday, February 06, 2023

One More Factor In The Great Sell-Out.

 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11715677/Christian-leaders-including-Pope-Francis-Archbishop-Canterbury-denounce-anti-gay-laws.html

NHS - Unfit For Purpose?

Throwing Money at The NHS Won't Work says military chief turned troubleshooter

Sir Gordon Messenger warns extra funding could be wasted without urgent reforms made to improve the health service


General Sir Gordon Messenger says spending money to deal with A&E waiting times is 'almost like painting the bedrooms without fixing the roof' unless there is better leadership CREDIT: Paul Grover for The Telegraph

Throwing money at the NHS will not address its fundamental weaknesses, the author of a review into the leadership of the health service has warned.

General Sir Gordon Messenger said that the health service is in urgent need of reform, without which extra funding will be wasted.

He suggested that supermarkets and banks are better at ensuring the right people are in senior management roles than the health service.

His intervention comes as the NHS faces the biggest strikes in its history on Monday, with nurses and ambulance workers walking out over pay.

Unions are demanding pay rises of up to 19 per cent, despite warnings that such salary increases would eat into budgets that were expanded to fund reform and improve patient outcomes.

Grant Shapps, Business Secretary, warned that the industrial action could cost lives.

In his first major interview since leading the review of health and social care leadership, which was ordered by Boris Johnson, Sir Gordon said: “The two big things you want from the health service are productivity – ie effective use of public money – and good patient care.

“I would argue that a really important component of that is a well-led, well-motivated, valued, resilient workforce, which comes from the culture, and the right attitude to leadership.

“I found an inadequate focus on that… and I would argue that unless you get the right culture, which means better leadership, it’s almost like painting the bedrooms without fixing the roof, in terms of throwing money at A&E waiting times.”

His comments come a week after the Prime Minister published an Urgent and Emergency Care Recovery plan, backed by £14 billion of extra spending over two years, to tackle record accident and emergency and ambulance waiting times.

The boost in last year’s budget followed a £36 billion, three-year spending plan agreed the previous year. Increases in funding to clear waiting-list backlogs have remained in place, even after the rise in National Insurance intended to pay for them was axed.

The former general, who led the Royal Marines’ invasion of Iraq, was clear that he was not suggesting funds are not needed. However, he warned that money will continue to be wasted without efforts to improve the quality of management and motivate staff.

“Unless you have that well-led, well-motivated, valued, resilient workforce, the sand is slipping through your fingers, however much you keep topping it up,” he said.

Sir Gordon warned that a “sense of constant crisis” in the NHS too often means other matters are neglected.

The former vice-chief of the defence staff said all NHS managers should now be asked to achieve competence standards at key points in their career, in order to develop the best leaders – and avoid over-promotion of those without core skills.

As the biggest employer in the country, the NHS should be able to do far more to “talent spot” good people and develop them, he said

Sir Gordon, who spent 38 years in the military, also told The Telegraph that he was surprised by the extent of the “blame culture” and “responsibility avoidance” in the NHS.

The former military chief said the NHS appeared to lack a “collective instinct” and enough sense that people should “rally round” and tackle problems they encounter.


‘Finger-pointing in the NHS came as a shock to me’

General Sir Gordon Messenger has served in Kosovo, Lebanon and Afghanistan.

Twenty years ago, he led the Royal Marines’ invasion of Iraq.

Yet he suggests Britain’s health and social care system, and how best to manage it, is in some ways a more fiendish challenge.

The military man was asked by Downing Street to launch the most far-reaching review of health and social care leadership in 40 years.

“I think there is an assumption, wrongly held, in certain quarters that if you want to get something done, you get a general in,” said Sir Gordon. “It misses the point that generals can get things done because they’ve got lots of people who do things for them, because they have a system in place.”

The former general had already been brought in by ministers to assist in the pandemic, introducing community testing and hotel quarantines.

Repeatedly, he found himself “pulling levers” only to find “there was nothing at the end of them”.

“I have learned more about leadership in the three years since I left the military than in the 38 years I served in it,” said Sir Gordon, 60.

“Essentially, military leadership has got a lot going for it. It’s got a good hand of cards because you’ve got a culture of leaders and being led, well-understood structures, relationships and very clear hierarchies.

“The reason why the military can ‘do’ crises is because they’ve got a doctrine established in peacetime to fall back on – a set of handrails if you like. I don’t think that’s necessarily true of other organisations, such as the NHS.”

Since his review of leadership in health and social care reported last summer, the Government’s own leadership has been on its own rollercoaster, including three changes of health secretary.

Meanwhile, the NHS has careered into the worst winter crisis in its history, with record accident and emergency delays and ambulance waits, along with seven million on waiting lists.

On Monday, Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, launched an urgent and emergency care plan, promising “the largest and fastest ever improvement in emergency waiting times in the NHS’s history”.

But Sir Gordon suggested that it is a mistake for the NHS to keep bouncing from one crisis to the next, without making fundamental changes to bolster the service for the long-term.

An “inadequate” focus on such matters is letting staff – and the public – down.

“I would argue that unless you get the right culture, which means better leadership, it’s almost like painting the bedrooms without fixing the roof, in terms of throwing money at A&E waiting times,” he said.

“Unless you have that well led, well-motivated, valued, resilient workforce, the sand is slipping through your fingers, however much you keep topping it up.”

In particular, he was perturbed by the lack of team spirit he encountered in many parts of the health and social-care system, with wrongdoing unchecked for fear of “putting the head above the parapet”.

“The things that I found most surprising were the blame culture, the finger-pointing and the responsibility avoidance,” he said.

“If you feel alone, you don’t feel brave enough. If you see something that's going wrong, what should happen is a collective response, a team response – let’s rally around, let’s get this sorted.” 

Instead, too often he encountered staff who feared that raising issues meant “putting my head above the parapet, to be criticised or shut down or accused”.

Sir Gordon said he encountered such a response at all levels, including senior medicine and management.

“The idea that you have a collective instinct – that ‘we’re in it together’ doesn’t seem to exist and I think at the heart of it, that is a leadership issue,” he said.

‘Talent management is almost non-existent’

Among his recommendations are competence standards for NHS managers at key points in their career and consistent systems of appraisals, training and development.

The absence of such systems means that despite being Britain’s largest employer, the NHS does little to attract or develop the best leaders, he suggested. Instead, it swaps around the most senior figures, he said, giving far too little help to those coming up the ranks.

“Talent management is almost non-existent,” he said, suggesting that boards with good senior executives “hoard” them, while those in a comfortable job have no incentive to move.

Meanwhile, it is hard to persuade senior managers to take on the toughest and most high-risk jobs turning around organisations with the worst performance.

“I would describe the senior leadership in the health sector as a transfer market,” he said.

“It’s just headhunters that are paid ridiculous amounts of money phoning up the names that are already known and asking if they want to do jobs as the head of trusts. It’s unbelievable.”

While the findings were welcomed by the Government and the NHS, there has been little outward sign of changes – although Sir Gordon believes plans to roll out such changes are still “alive” within the health service.  

Before his report was issued last June, newspapers – including this one – were briefed by the Government that it was part of a war on “waste and wokery”, with the NHS ordered to cut “diversity and inclusion jobs”.

Sir Gordon describes those messages as “a total distortion of the findings”.

The report itself was rather more nuanced, suggesting that in time the numbers in such posts should naturally reduce if the health service makes progress on tackling inequality. DT.

Barney Should Learn Basic Spelling Or At Least, How To Use A Spell-Checker.

 The board of the Independant School of the Year conveyed their ‘utter shock and disbelief’ at ...

By Barney Davis. Evening Standard

Donald - It's OVER! - Now Get Out of The Way of Di Santis.

Donald Trump more 'angry and committed' than ever as ex-POTUS kickstarts 2024 campaign

Donald Trump's visits to New Hampshire and South Carolina will see the 45th President return to the campaign trail for the first time since he launched his 2024 bid on November 15.

By JACK WALTERS, Express.

I Disagree To an Extent, Peter. Yes, It is The Usual Main Channel Leftist Propaganda - But It Is Entertaining, At Least.

 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/columnists/article-11687621/PETER-HITCHENS-balk-Happy-Valleys-depiction-grim-modern-Britain.html

The Only Time I Have Doubted Our Support For Ukraine.

 The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said ahead of an EU-Ukraine summit next week that Ukraine had unconditional support from the bloc and needed to prevail against Russian attacks to defend European values. “We stand by Ukraine’s side without any ifs and buts. Ukraine is fighting for our shared values, it is fighting for the respect of international law and for the principles of democracy and that is why Ukraine has to win this war.” Guardian.

Blogger: 'Democracy?' - The European Union?

Mary Stone - A Mighty Christian.

 

Shi, Meiyu (Mary Stone) (1873-1954)

One Of The First Chinese Medical Doctors

Shi Meiyu, also known as Mary Stone, a name she adopted while studying in the United States, was born into a Christian family in Jiujiang (Kiukiang), Jiangxi province in 1873. Her father was a Methodist pastor and mother was the principal of a Methodist school for girls. Defying Chinese tradition, her parents refused to bind her feet. She was taught the Chinese classics and Christian literature by her mother. Impressed by the work of American medical missionary Dr. Kate Bushnell, her father, decided that she should become a doctor.
Having graduated from the Rulison-Fish Memorial School under the guidance of Gertrude Howe, an American Methodist from Lansing, Michigan, she left for the United States with Howe in 1892 to study medicine at the University of Michigan. In 1896, she graduated together with her friend, Kang Cheng (Ida Kahn), the first two Chinese women to receive medical degree from an American university. Upon graduation, they returned to China as medical missionaries of the Women’s Foreign Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church and set up a one-room hospital in Jiujiang. In the first 10 months, Shi and her associates treated more than 2,300 outpatients and made hundreds house calls, and their hospital was always filled.
During the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, Shi lost her father, causing both her and Kang Cheng to seek refuge in Japan. They returned in 1901 and, with the support of Dr. Isaac Newton Danforth, opened the Elizabeth Skelton Danforth Hospital, a 95-bed, 15-room hospital. For some 20 years, Shi worked there as superintendent, taking care of patients, training nurses, and promoting public hygiene. Grown up with unbound feet, she was enthusiastic in opposing footbinding. During busy periods, Shi’s hospital was treating around 5,000 patients per month. She supervised the training of more than 500 Chinese nurses and translated training manuals and textbooks for their use. She also supervised a home for cripples and adopted for boys. Even, as she herself underwent surgery in Chicago in 1907, she took this as an opportunity to raise funds for her hospital. A Rockefeller Foundation scholarship enabled her to do postgraduate work at Johns Hopkins University from 1918 to 1919. Her sister, Phoebe, also a doctor and a graduate of Johns Hopkins, took charge of the Danforth Hospital in her absence.
Upon her return to China in 1920, Shi severed her ties with the Methodist Board of Missions and moved to Shanghai. She established the Shanghai Bethel Mission with the assistance of Jennie V. Hughes, an American missionary. In less than 10 years, the Bethel Mission had developed a hospital, primary and secondary schools, an evangelistic training department, and an orphanage. She conducted Bible classes for the nurses, intending to produce nurse-evangelists. From 1920 until the Japanese invasion in 1937, Bethel was well known for its training program for nurses. The Japanese invasion forced Bethel members to move inland and to Hong Kong, resulting in new Bethel churches. Shi went to the United States to raise support for the Mission.
Shi was also a prominent evangelist and women’s leader of the Chinese church. She served as a member of the China Continuation Committee of the National Missionary Conference after the Edinburgh World Missionary Conference of 1910. She was the first Chinese Christian woman to be ordained in central China. Recognizing the importance of carrying out mission work by the Chinese, she cofounded the Chinese Missionary Society in 1918. This society aimed at supporting and sending Chinese missionaries to work among the Chinese. She was also the first president of the Women’s Christian Temperance Union in China (1922), an organization committed to fighting alcoholism and the use of opium and cigarettes. In the 1930s, she was one of the organizers who formed the Bethel Worldwide Evangelistic Band. In 1948 the Bethel hospital built a surgery ward in her honor.
Shi spent her last years in Pasadena, California. In 1954, she died at the age of 82.
This article is taken, with permission, from the Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Christianity: http://www.bdcconline.net/en/stories/s/shi-meiyu.php

Birdie.

 

Job 5:5.

Leprosy Has Not Gone Away.

Leprosy in paradise.

Leprosy Mission   29 January 2023 
Grandmother Aloka was cured of leprosy after being diagnosed by a Leprosy Mission outreach worker in her tea garden. But sadly the cure came too late to prevent damage to her left hand. Her fingers won't straighten, and they can no longer grip the delicate tea leaves. She can now only pick tea leaves with her right hand. As she is paid by the kilogram, she earns a fraction of what she once did, impacting her entire family.(Photo: Ruth Towell)
Leprosy Mission teams are shocked to discover the tea gardens of Bangladesh are home to the highest leprosy rate they have seen.
The Leprosy Mission has worked in the slums of the Bangladeshi capital Dhaka for many years. The overcrowded living conditions and poor sanitation are not only distressing but ripe for disease.
Just a few hours' drive Northeast of Dhaka, the fresh air and the vibrant foliage of the tea gardens are the perfect antidote to the city slums.
But appearances can be deceptive. While the tea crop flourishes, leprosy is choking the life out of its workforce.
There are 600,000 people living and working on the tea estates of Sylhet with the leprosy rate 20-30 times the global average. This equates to thousands of people living with untreated leprosy. Almost no family remains unscathed and even children are showing the early signs.
Leprosy Mission doctors and health workers are staggered by the number of new cases they have found. Since going into tea estates in 2017, they have found and cured more than 1,600 new cases of leprosy. The more they look, the more they find.
The discovery has culminated in the launch of the Flourish campaign on Sunday 29 January, World Leprosy Day 2023. Flourish seeks to find and cure tea workers and their families of leprosy, protect livelihoods and create a future where the whole community can flourish.
Chief Executive, Peter Waddup, says there is a real urgency to find and cure new cases of leprosy. This is before disability sets in and the tea workers lose everything they know and love. He shares this report: 
The situation in the tea gardens is very unusual. This is not just because of the extraordinary high rate of leprosy but the lack of stigma surrounding the disease.
I've had the privilege of visiting our projects across Asia and Africa and one thing is constant. That is the terrible prejudice surrounding leprosy. People are, understandably, reluctant to come forward for treatment because of this prejudice. They live in fear of being seen as cursed and cast out of their families and communities.
But what is unusual within the tea estates of Bangladesh is there doesn't seem to be a huge amount of stigma surrounding the disease.
This is likely to be because the workforce is made up of ethnic and religious minorities who are, sadly, already marginalised from society.
Dalamar, pictured, is 50 years old and was diagnosed and treated for leprosy in September. She had heard that leprosy was spreading in the tea gardens and suspected that she might have the disease. So, although afraid, she attended a Leprosy Mission pop-up clinic in her tea garden as she wanted to protect her family.(Photo: Ruth Towell)
When the workers are fit and well, they form a tight-knit community with friendships between the tea pickers often going back decades.
The trouble comes when nerve damage caused by leprosy causes fingers to curl.
As the tea pickers are paid by the kilogram of tea picked, speed and efficiency are everything.
There is a very real worry among the tea pickers that they will lose their home and community. This is because employees are provided with a basic family home which they must leave should they become too sick or disabled to work.
My colleagues in Bangladesh are already running pop-up clinics in a third of the tea gardens in Sylhet, finding and curing new leprosy cases.
Knowing the full extent of the problem, we desperately need the resources to scale up this work.
There is a real urgency to find and cure people before leprosy leaves them too disabled to work and they lose everything.
The aim is always to cure people of leprosy at the earliest opportunity.
As well as preventing transmission, prompt treatment stops leprosy from causing life long disabilities.
The fact that there doesn't appear to be too much stigma surrounding taking the cure for leprosy in the tea gardens is a good thing. It means people are open to treatment.
Tragically it is when they are forced to leave the tea gardens because of leprosy that they are exposed to extreme prejudice.

Our Armed Forces - Unfit For Purpose?

 British Army's 'dire state' as 10,000 troops cut and equipment obsolete – damning verdict.

The senior Conservative backbencher said the UK "needs to move to a war footing" after questions about the capabilities of the British Army.

Tobias Ellwood today issued a stark warning over the "dire state" of the British Army. The Tory chairman of the Defence Select Committee called on the Government to reverse "swathing cuts" because "we are now at war in Europe". Express.

Bank of England - Unfit For Purpose?

 This week the Bank of England will again be centre stage as it contemplates another rise in interest rates. Quite apart from its short-term actions, there is a powerful swell of criticism of the role of the Bank in exacerbating the current economic difficulties.

While it has died down somewhat now, there was talk in some quarters of altering the Bank’s mandate, or even of suspending its independence and returning to the situation before 1997 when monetary policy was effectively dictated by the chancellor.
Is criticism that the Bank has contributed to our current economic woes fair?
Let’s start with the background. In the wake of the global financial crisis of 2007, central banks operated a policy of low official interest rates and Quantitative Easing (QE) - that is to say, the purchase of financial assets, mainly government bonds, financed with newly issued money. The aim was to support aggregate demand and prevent the financial system from imploding.
At the time, there was a real fear in policy circles that we could be in for a repeat of the Great Depression of the 1930s with endemic deflation, not only of real economic activity but also of the price level. Low interest rates and QE were the response.
Some economists criticised this Bank’s actions at the time and argued that loose monetary policy would be inflationary. In the event, they proved to be wrong. Despite the huge injection of central bank money, the growth of the broad money supply remained subdued. In essence, the policy of QE pumped huge amounts of money into the banking system where it remained – inert.
True, inflation here did briefly exceed 5pc in September 2008, driven up by strong increases in commodity prices, and again three years later. But these upsurges were transitory. At the end of 2019, just before the coronavirus hit us, inflation was running at less than 2pc and it continued to be very low into the early months of 2021.
In response to the coronavirus crisis, the Bank reduced official interest rates from 0.75pc to 0.1pc and engaged in massive QE. According to some commentators, this was the height of folly. QE was an aberration that was bound to cause inflation.
I think this assessment was profoundly mistaken. Admittedly, QE was a risky policy and it proved more effective at boosting asset prices than the economy. Nevertheless, it was a perfectly legitimate tool of monetary policy once interest rates had effectively reached zero.
Of course, inflation can be a great evil but it isn’t the only one. The pandemic brought on a massive collapse of output but, remarkably, things could have been much worse. Another Great Depression would have been a catastrophe.
So, in my view, the Bank’s actions were broadly correct. The problem lay in not recognising early enough that inflation was emerging as a serious threat and that, accordingly, interest rates had to be raised pronto and the QE programme stopped, before soon being put into reverse.
In making this error, the Bank was unduly influenced by the experience after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). In fact, there were two huge differences from that period – one monetary and the other real. The big monetary difference was that this time round the money supply expanded rapidly. In the early months of 2021, the annual growth of the broad money supply exceeded 15pc.
Moreover, this money wasn’t just sloshing around the banking system. The huge increase in government spending and borrowing to support people and businesses through the pandemic meant that additional money found its way into their bank accounts. They were thereby able to sustain their spending through the pandemic and afterwards. By contrast, after the GFC, the Government tightened fiscal policy.
The real factor that the Bank missed was the sharp fall in supply capacity induced by the pandemic and the measures taken to deal with it. In this country that fall was especially associated with a drop in the workforce. So strong monetary demand coincided with reduced supply, causing an upsurge of inflation.The inflationary forces unleashed by the Ukraine war last year intensified the crisis but a major monetary policy error had been made before the invasion of Ukraine. Inflation was already on the up and the Bank of England was already behind events.Now the Bank has to continue its catching up at an inauspicious time. As it raises interest rates, it will tend to increase the cost of funding the Government’s huge deficit. Meanwhile, the housing and commercial property markets are under pressure. Higher interest rates could precipitate large falls in the prices of both residential and commercial property. Moreover, the economy is struggling to avoid recession.It is, I suppose, a consolation that some people believe that very low interest rates contribute to weak productivity growth by helping feeble businesses to cling on and thereby continue to use resources in less productive ways. It would be better, so the argument runs, for such “zombie” firms to be allowed to go to the wall, and for their resources to be released into the economy for more productive use elsewhere. This is an attractive possibility but no one knows how large the “dead zombie” bounce could be.Yet it is surely fair to say that the policy authorities have paid insufficient attention to the medium-term inefficiencies engendered by ultra-cheap money, not only the sustaining of zombie firms, but also the boost to house prices, which has so distorted our economy and society.Moreover, the persistent tendency for interest rates to be very low, and often negative in real terms, has undermined the savings culture with baleful economic effects. This should carry lessons for policy once things get back to normal.
But what to do now? The Bank should raise rates this week by 0.5 percentage points to 4pc. It should keep raising rates until we reach a level that will reliably get inflation down to the 2pc target and keep it there. The Bank made a serious monetary policy error which contributed to where we are today. That can be forgiven. But it has no room to make another.

Roger Bootle is chairman of Capital Economics. DT.

Woke Censorship.

 

Woke censors are ruining books. Michael Deacon.

Novelists used to have sleepless nights about their latest book would be received by the critics. No longer. Nowadays, they’re far more worried about how it will be received by the “sensitivity readers”.
These are the woke busybodies employed by modern publishers to ensure that absolutely no one anywhere on Earth could possibly take offence at a single syllable of any book. Their latest victim is Anthony Horowitz. In the current edition of The Spectator he reveals that, for the US release of his most recent novel, he was told by the sensitivity readers to replace the word “scalpel” with the term “surgical instrument”. Apparently this was to avoid causing offence to Native Americans, on the grounds that “scalpel” sounds a bit like “scalping” – which is what “Red Indians” used to do to their enemies. Why anyone would make such a bizarre connection, let alone be offended by it, I don’t know, but clearly the publishers felt it best to be on the safe side.
Just imagine if the great authors of the past had been bedevilled by sensitivity readers. They’d never have got a word into print.
“Ah, Mr Virgil, do sit down. Thank you for submitting the latest draft of your Aeneid. I’m afraid, however, that our sensitivity readers have flagged a number of concerns.
“First, your depiction of Polyphemus the cyclops is appallingly ableist. Just because he has only one eye, that does not mean it’s acceptable to call him ‘deformed’ or a ‘monster’.
“Second, the Greek underworld community is bound to be upset by your hurtful reference to ‘gorgons and harpies of foul wing’. For one thing, ‘harpy’ is a word with deeply misogynistic overtones.
“And third, you’re likely to cause great offence in Asia Minor. You suggest that Trojan people are so unbelievably stupid that, upon discovering a vast wooden horse unexpectedly deposited outside their city gates, they would presume it to be some kind of surprise gift from an anonymous well-wisher, and wheel it inside the city without undertaking the most cursory of security checks.
“As well as highly far-fetched, this storyline is profoundly insulting. It could easily cause a diplomatic incident. Or at least, it could, if Troy hadn’t fallen around 1,100 years ago.”

The tooth will out

Mick Lynch and his fellow trade union leaders constantly accuse the Government of underpaying public sector workers. Yet they remain mysteriously silent on the most tight-fisted employers of all.
Tooth fairies.
According to a shocking report this week in The Sun, tooth fairies are now paying British children an astonishing 10 per cent less for their teeth than they were just five years ago. In 2018, the standard rate per tooth was £2.10. These days, it’s a mere £1.90.
This is a scandal. Our children, quite clearly, are being ripped off by these selfish, exploitative, profiteering tooth fairies. Yet the union barons say nothing.
Well, if Mr Lynch and his cronies won’t defend our children, I will. I’m calling on all infants aged between five and 12 years old to take immediate strike action, by withholding their baby teeth until the tooth fairies are willing to get round the table and offer them an inflation-matching pay deal.
This isn’t just about fairness. The tooth fairies of this country need to realise that these cuts are self-defeating. The more money our children receive for their teeth, the more sweets they can afford to buy. And the more sweets they eat, the quicker their teeth will fall out. Slashing the average fee per tooth, therefore, represents a lamentably short-termist approach to business.
If this lack of investment leads to lower profits, our greedy tooth fairies will have only themselves to blame.  DT.

A Heavy Sigh.

  Most adults in England and Wales not in a traditional marriage . The Coalition for Marriage has criticised plans to give the "rewards...