Saturday, August 05, 2006

Survival of the fittest.


'Survival of the fittest' is the basis of darwinian thought and therefore, evolution. Consequently, rape and murder must be regarded as positives, so the strongest/most devious are the ones who deserve to progress.
Certainly, as a society, we do not embrace this. For the moment at least, we help the weakest, the oldest, the sick and the disabled to survive. We are flying in the face of 'evolution' and putting two fingers up at it. If evolutionists had a case, would it not be true that our tactics are actually helping to wreck the human race?
Certainly, the Nazis and many other groups moved towards eugenics - simply explained as 'controlled breeding from quality human stock only'. If evolution is true, in a godless, mechanistic universe, surely these horrific people such as Galton and the Aryan theorists must be seen as 'forward thinkers'.
Do not think that a belief in evolution is 'just one of those things' that does not really matter. The basis behind it is scary. Be logical. Think it through.
Creationists have a strong, scientific base for their beliefs. We must not let evolutionists win by simple default as they are doing at the moment.

I am not saying that 'survival of the fittest' is not a proven fact - it is. Whether it can possibly be the base of gradual evolution is quite another matter. The whole theory has a downside into what Man is and how believers in that faith (evolution IS a belief system) embrace an idea which is dangerous both spiritually and socially.

LINK: http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v13/i4/fittest.asp

SUPER LINK: http://www.answersingenesis.org/search/default.aspx?qt=survival+of+fittest&col=Articles

LINK: Evolutionist admits logical consequence of evolutionary thought:
http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2006/2006-04-07/feature1p/index.html

It Is Only A Crime In The Minds Of Those Who Support The Murder of Babies!

Silent prayer outside abortion clinics is 'not necessarily' a crime Silent prayer outside abortion clinics is 'not necessarily&#...