Martyrs?

Muslim elder Habib Khan kills neighbour, BNP member Keith Brown in Stoke amidst claims from Khan and his, of persecution by Brown. Khan is found guilty of manslaughter.
I have a number of problems with this:
1] Keith Brown, the victim here, is not exactly available to give his version of events, is he?
2] Just what degree of persecution possibly justifies the killing of a neighbour?
3] In these days of the authorities rooting out 'islamophobia' at the drop of a hat, just how likely is it that such a situation could have been ongoing?
4] The media have accepted the possibly sanitised version of events.
5] In court, the defence have done the customary job of apportioning blame to anybody but their client which, as I can personally assure you, makes finding the 'true truth' more than a little difficult.
6] BNP members are 'fair game'.
7] Being perfectly objective, I ask you, hand on heart, do you believe that had Brown killed Khan, a manslaughter verdict would have been reached?
8] Do you believe, that with the reversed situation, Brown's tariff would not have been increased dramatically for reasons of the crime being 'racially aggravated'?
9] Journalists have been saying that Brown 'must not be allowed to become a martyr to the BNP cause.'
I totally agree. I have no time for the BNP. Just one problem then. Wouldn't these self same journalists have happily turned Khan into a martyr?
10] Have you, like me, had the impression that this murder 'wasn't all that bad, really' from the coverage? - No? - Maybe its just me then wanting neither Brown nor Khan butchered by the other!










How difficult it is to get to the truth in this politically correct, left-leaning, media-driven madness which today passes for a society?