Ashley Mote MEP has been causing trouble - in a good way. The man may have had his problems, but he is certainly on the ball here. So now we know, both Police and Government are above the Rule of Law!Scotland Yard Won’t Investigate The BBC.
A reply has finally been received from Magnus Gudmundsson, of Scotland Yard’s specialist crime directorate, to my submission of evidence of the BBC’s pro-EU bias in prima facie breach of its Royal Charter.
The corporation has been seriously compromised by its acceptance of millions of euros from the EU and blatant support of British membership.
It has taken some six months for Scotland Yard to invent reasons why the police will not investigate. Note the use of the words “will not”. Mr Gudmundsson makes no claim that Scotland Yard “cannot” investigate. They have made a conscious decision not to investigate.
As a result of his decision, the following response has been sent to Scotland Yard:
Thank you for your letter of September 1, eventually in response to my correspondence and enclosures sent to Scotland Yard some six months ago.
You have clearly had great trouble concocting an adequate answer since it has taken you and your colleagues so long
You appear to have invented a new legal concept – namely that only crimes which meet the police’s own priorities will be investigated.
It is possible you are unfamiliar with the concept that the rule of law is even more important than the law itself. You appear to be suggesting that this no longer applies to the police. Is this the case?
I should also point out to you that, seeking to suggest that the government has made decisions about police priorities is an entirely circular argument. The BBC has become an arm of the corporate state, it is plainly being financed by the EU (see my documentation) and it is equally plainly being manipulated by an institution with a clear political agenda (see Lord Pearson’s numerous reports).
So to suggest that it does not meet your priorities is threadbare and unacceptable.
As for your suggestion that this is not an investigation in the public interest I must tell you that there will be many tens of thousands of people who simply do not accept such an assertion.
I await your clarification of the points raised above.
Ashley Mote
PS: A suggestion: Why not write and tell Scotland Yard that you are a member of the public and such an investigation is in your interest. Ask others to do the same.
The corporation has been seriously compromised by its acceptance of millions of euros from the EU and blatant support of British membership.
It has taken some six months for Scotland Yard to invent reasons why the police will not investigate. Note the use of the words “will not”. Mr Gudmundsson makes no claim that Scotland Yard “cannot” investigate. They have made a conscious decision not to investigate.
As a result of his decision, the following response has been sent to Scotland Yard:
Thank you for your letter of September 1, eventually in response to my correspondence and enclosures sent to Scotland Yard some six months ago.
You have clearly had great trouble concocting an adequate answer since it has taken you and your colleagues so long
You appear to have invented a new legal concept – namely that only crimes which meet the police’s own priorities will be investigated.
It is possible you are unfamiliar with the concept that the rule of law is even more important than the law itself. You appear to be suggesting that this no longer applies to the police. Is this the case?
I should also point out to you that, seeking to suggest that the government has made decisions about police priorities is an entirely circular argument. The BBC has become an arm of the corporate state, it is plainly being financed by the EU (see my documentation) and it is equally plainly being manipulated by an institution with a clear political agenda (see Lord Pearson’s numerous reports).
So to suggest that it does not meet your priorities is threadbare and unacceptable.
As for your suggestion that this is not an investigation in the public interest I must tell you that there will be many tens of thousands of people who simply do not accept such an assertion.
I await your clarification of the points raised above.
Ashley Mote
PS: A suggestion: Why not write and tell Scotland Yard that you are a member of the public and such an investigation is in your interest. Ask others to do the same.
