"Anthropologists will tell you that a myth is often the faded memory of a real event. Details may have been added, lost, or obscured in the telling and retelling, but the kernel of truth remains. When two separate cultures have the same "myth" in their body of folklore, their ancestors must have either experienced the same event, or they both descended from a common ancestral source which itself experienced the event."Hmm. So if that 'myth' is repeated across some 200 cultures and varying stories - I wonder if that might possibly strengthen the original truth behind it all?
To find out what I am talking about - refer to the link!
LINK: http://www.icr.org/article/570/
Well. Impressive, eh? - Of course, what the anthropologists et al say as being normally the case is not considered applicable by many so called scientists when considering this particular issue. Excuses must be found.
A tad selective, what?
