No, Rishi. You May Not Have My Vote - EVER!

Thousands of small boat migrants can claim asylum as Sunak ditches Patel’s policy.

The move is part of an attempt to slash the backlog of 137,600 asylum applications and cut the £6m-a-day bill for housing them in hotels

ByCharles Hymas, HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR. DT.BLOGGER:1) REFUGEES NOT ARRIVING IN FAMILY GROUPS ARE very seldom REFUGEES AT ALL.2) THE UN PROTOCOLS INSIST THAT REFUGEES - REAL OR IMAGINARY - MUST NOT LEAVE A SAFE COUNTRY TO INVADE OUR SHORES.3) ALMOST ALL HAVE DESTROYED ANY PAPERS THEY MAY ONCE HAVE HAD. WHY?4) IT IS simply IMPOSSIBLE FOR GROUPS OF REFUGEES TO CONSIST ALMOST ENTIRELY OF MALES BETWEEN 15 AND 30.5) IF YOU LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHERE  THERE IS NO WAR - SUCH AS: INDIA, PAKISTAN, ALBANIA ETC - YOU ARE AN ILLEGAL MIGRANT ON OUR SHORES.6) ANYBODY WHO EVADES OUR LEGAL METHODS OF ENTRY TO THE UK IS A CRIMINAL BY DEFINITION.7) GENUINE REFUGEES WHO LEAVE SAFE NATIONS TO MOVE ILLEGALLY TO THE UK HAVE CEASED TO BE REFUGEES AND SHOULD NEVER BE TREATED AS SUCH.NOT A SINGLE PERSON WHO HAS ENTERED THE UK ILLEGALLY SHOULD EVER BE GRANTED ASYLUM. IT IS MORALLY DISGRACEFUL.WE ARE A NATION WHICH HAS READILY ACCEPTED MILLIONS OF REFUGEES - BUT IN THE DAYS OF HOME SECRETARY BLUNKETT - HE STATED THAT (BACK THEN) 90% OF CLAIMS WERE BOGUS. PERHAPS THE FIGURES ARE NO LONGER QUITE THAT HIGH BUT - CLEARLY THE NUMBERS OF BOGUS REFUGEES WILL STILL FORM A HUGE PERCENTAGE.