Kipling scholars are celebrating the publication of lost poems by the author whose exhortations in "If" to "keep your head when all about you / Are losing theirs and blaming it on you" are regularly voted the nation's favourite poem. Discovered by the American scholar Thomas Pinney in an array of hiding places including family papers, the archive of a former head of the Cunard Line and during renovations at a Manhattan house, more than 50 previously unpublished poems by Rudyard Kipling will be released for the first time next month. Guardian.
Self explanatory title. I abhor that nicey nicey, politically correct, pseudo-Christianity which almost always supports leftwing attitudes - which in most cases are profoundly anti-Gospel. This Blog supports persecuted Christians. This Blog exposes cults. This Blog opposes junk science. UPDATED DAILY. This is not a forum. This Blog supports truly Christian websites and aids their efforts. It is hardhitting and unashamedly evangelical so if it offends - please do not come to this site!
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
'New' Kipling Poems - Exciting Find.
Kipling scholars are celebrating the publication of lost poems by the author whose exhortations in "If" to "keep your head when all about you / Are losing theirs and blaming it on you" are regularly voted the nation's favourite poem. Discovered by the American scholar Thomas Pinney in an array of hiding places including family papers, the archive of a former head of the Cunard Line and during renovations at a Manhattan house, more than 50 previously unpublished poems by Rudyard Kipling will be released for the first time next month. Guardian.
Humans Getting Less Intelligent?
“HUMAN BEINGS ARE GETTING DUMBER” proclaims an article in
news.com 19 February 2013. This blunt unflattering assessment of humanity is
based on articles by Gerald Crabtree of Stanford University entitled “Our Fragile
Intellect” published in Trends in Genetics January 2013.
John Mackay responds:
Crabtree is correct about mutations degrading the human genome, and therefore it
is inevitable that some mutations would damage human brain function. Recent
genome studies such as the 1000 Genome Project have shown that genes are being
rendered useless (and therefore effectively lost) or less functional with every
generation. However, no-one has reported a newly formed gene that improves human
intellect (or any other human function). There is, therefore, no evidence
mutations created and “optimised” these genes in any human ancestor, and caused
them to evolve a large complex brain, especially as they are observed to be
doing the opposite!
John Mackay responds:
Crabtree is correct about mutations degrading the human genome, and therefore it
is inevitable that some mutations would damage human brain function. Recent
genome studies such as the 1000 Genome Project have shown that genes are being
rendered useless (and therefore effectively lost) or less functional with every
generation. However, no-one has reported a newly formed gene that improves human
intellect (or any other human function). There is, therefore, no evidence
mutations created and “optimised” these genes in any human ancestor, and caused
them to evolve a large complex brain, especially as they are observed to be
doing the opposite!
Ukip On The Up.
Writing on The HuffingtonPost UK on Tuesday, Mr Farage said his party was gaining votes from people who had not voted for years."Ukip are picking up support across the spectrum. Only a third comes from former Tory voters, the rest we are harvesting from Labour, Lib Dems and most promisingly, from people who haven't voted in years," he said.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Please Pray For Pastor Abedini.
(Photo: Reuters)
By Morning Star News
An Iranian-American pastor imprisoned for planting house churches in Iran years ago writes that he is undergoing torture, death threats, and pressure to renounce his faith from prison officials and inmates. Christian Post.
Edinburgh Victory.
Victory
for Edinburgh University's pro-life student movement.
This week, Edinburgh University’s Life Society
succeeded in its campaign against a motion to renew a union policy to "support a
woman’s right to choose and affiliate to abortion rights."
The motion was defeated during a debate this week where Life Society President, Venesa Reith, argued that the policy threatened to "alienate a proportion of the student population."
Delighted with the result, Venessa said: "We at Edinburgh University Life Society would encourage other universities facing pro-choice motions to stand up and be counted!
“It’s scary, and it’s daunting, but if you take a stand (and do so with compassion and a thought for the people who are voting the other way) then you are already being a witness to the pro-life movement in the UK.”
The Life Society was supported by the Alliance of Pro-Life Students, which aims to promote the culture of life and bring the pro-life message back onto university campuses. Christian Concern.
The motion was defeated during a debate this week where Life Society President, Venesa Reith, argued that the policy threatened to "alienate a proportion of the student population."
Delighted with the result, Venessa said: "We at Edinburgh University Life Society would encourage other universities facing pro-choice motions to stand up and be counted!
“It’s scary, and it’s daunting, but if you take a stand (and do so with compassion and a thought for the people who are voting the other way) then you are already being a witness to the pro-life movement in the UK.”
The Life Society was supported by the Alliance of Pro-Life Students, which aims to promote the culture of life and bring the pro-life message back onto university campuses. Christian Concern.
Eastleigh Poll?????
Labour 25.44%
UK Independence Party 24.45%
Conservatives
20.72%
Liberal Democrats 15.35%
Beer, Baccy and Crumpet Party 4.28%
Others (including English Democrats on 1.2%)
9.76% Huff Post.
Only 68 Years Too Late!
The 4cm by 4cm medal will hang from a ribbon incorporating colours that represent the three Armed Services, red for the Merchant Navy and a central white stripe, emphasised by black edging, marking the Arctic. Mail.
Potholes Cause Erratic Driving.
From: Keith Wigglesworth, Mead Way, Highburton, Huddersfield.
MESSAGE for all police drivers: should you be following my car and see it meandering all over the road, please do not automatically assume that a) I have a skinfull of ale; b) I have been squirting noxious substances into my veins; c) I have been stuffing white powder up my nasal orifices; or d) I have been inhaling the smoke from various burning grassy substances. I will instead, be indulging in a rapidly growing pastime that is becoming so popular, particularly in the Kirklees area, that it could very soon achieve Olympic status. I refer of course to pothole dodging (Tom Richmond, Yorkshire Post, February 24).
MESSAGE for all police drivers: should you be following my car and see it meandering all over the road, please do not automatically assume that a) I have a skinfull of ale; b) I have been squirting noxious substances into my veins; c) I have been stuffing white powder up my nasal orifices; or d) I have been inhaling the smoke from various burning grassy substances. I will instead, be indulging in a rapidly growing pastime that is becoming so popular, particularly in the Kirklees area, that it could very soon achieve Olympic status. I refer of course to pothole dodging (Tom Richmond, Yorkshire Post, February 24).
Having in the past faced bills for my cars of more than £250 for repairs to the suspension caused by unrepaired potholes, I am simply trying to avoid a repetition, particularly as our local authority absolves itself from any liability, despite all governments over many years taking vast sums of money from motorists in the guise of road fund taxation and returning only a small amount to local authorities for them to effect repairs to the road system.
Much of this money is simply frittered away on numerous idiotic schemes instead of being used for the very purpose it was originally intended – the upkeep of our road system.
Perhaps the name should be changed from road fund tax to say “just another way to screw the motorist tax”. But then, that would entail the setting up of a quango, plus a hundred or so sub-committees to discuss the matter ad infinitum, wasting even more Parliamentary time as we have recently seen with the gay marriage thing, when there are much more pressing matters to be dealt with, such as getting our country back on its feet again, and don’t even think about getting me started on fuel duty. Yorks Post.
Much of this money is simply frittered away on numerous idiotic schemes instead of being used for the very purpose it was originally intended – the upkeep of our road system.
Perhaps the name should be changed from road fund tax to say “just another way to screw the motorist tax”. But then, that would entail the setting up of a quango, plus a hundred or so sub-committees to discuss the matter ad infinitum, wasting even more Parliamentary time as we have recently seen with the gay marriage thing, when there are much more pressing matters to be dealt with, such as getting our country back on its feet again, and don’t even think about getting me started on fuel duty. Yorks Post.
Girl Guides.
As it stands, Girl Guides promise to "love my God." This reference to God could be removed depending on the responses to the consultation.
Please have your say by completing the online survey. It's a simple tick-box survey that only takes a few minutes and is open to all members of the public. The deadline is 3rd March. Christian Concern.
Cameron's Wretched Strategy - By Prof. Tim Congdon.
The
failure of Cameron’s strategy to ‘modernise’ the Conservative Party and to
‘decontaminate the brand’.
David Cameron has had a clear electoral strategy since he became leader of the Conservative Party in autumn 2005. The aim has been to persuade middle-ground Liberal Democrats to switch to the Conservatives by jettisoning the Conservatives’ supposed image of ‘nastiness’ (i.e., of so-called ‘right-wing’ views on social issues). The Conservatives were to be ‘modernised’, and the resulting ‘rebranding’ would make them appear a nicer bunch of people, and a more civilized and attractive party. Like Tony Blair, Cameron saw – and continues to see – the word ‘modern’ as expressing much that is good and desirable, and ‘modernisation’ as something to be pursued. The deliberate intention was to drop the Thatcherite element in contemporary Conservatism, with its allegedly harsh emphasis on unbridled individualism, private enterprise and a smaller state. Thatcher had said, following a theme in some of Hayek’s writings, that ‘there is no such thing as society’, since ultimately every society can be decomposed into particular people and their families. By contrast, Cameron in a 2005 article for The Spectator said that he was in favour of ‘social action zones’ (whatever they might be) and that his larger political ideal was ‘the Big Society’. The three Conservative losses in the general elections of 1997, 2001 and 2005 were attributed by Cameron and his associates to their party’s continued adherence to too much ‘right-wing Thatcherism’.
David Cameron has had a clear electoral strategy since he became leader of the Conservative Party in autumn 2005. The aim has been to persuade middle-ground Liberal Democrats to switch to the Conservatives by jettisoning the Conservatives’ supposed image of ‘nastiness’ (i.e., of so-called ‘right-wing’ views on social issues). The Conservatives were to be ‘modernised’, and the resulting ‘rebranding’ would make them appear a nicer bunch of people, and a more civilized and attractive party. Like Tony Blair, Cameron saw – and continues to see – the word ‘modern’ as expressing much that is good and desirable, and ‘modernisation’ as something to be pursued. The deliberate intention was to drop the Thatcherite element in contemporary Conservatism, with its allegedly harsh emphasis on unbridled individualism, private enterprise and a smaller state. Thatcher had said, following a theme in some of Hayek’s writings, that ‘there is no such thing as society’, since ultimately every society can be decomposed into particular people and their families. By contrast, Cameron in a 2005 article for The Spectator said that he was in favour of ‘social action zones’ (whatever they might be) and that his larger political ideal was ‘the Big Society’. The three Conservative losses in the general elections of 1997, 2001 and 2005 were attributed by Cameron and his associates to their party’s continued adherence to too much ‘right-wing Thatcherism’.
An obvious
interpretation of the Eastleigh by-election is that Cameron’s strategy has
failed. Indeed, it has been a catastrophe for the Conservative Party. Eastleigh
became a LibDem stronghold in the opening years of the 21st century,
but before that it was a standard Conservative seat of the safe, Home Counties
variety. Opinion polls nationally show that the LibDems are deeply unpopular,
but in Eastleigh they throughout the by-election campaign battled as the
favourites. Polls have steadily given them 30% or more of the vote. Meanwhile
the Conservatives have lost ground to the UK Independence Party. Opinion surveys
show that UKIP does particularly well in the C and D groups in the population,
i.e., those seen to be in lower middle class ‘and below’. It is these groups
that have no truck with Cameron’s ‘modernisation’ (i.e., in reality, the
endorsement of ‘political correctness’) and no interest in the rebranding
exercise. (What is ‘political correctness? I think, in essence, it is the notion
that ‘society’ [really ‘the state’] should deliver equality of outcomes between
people, regardless of their educational attainments, race, citizenship, creed,
gender and sexual preferences, and even of how hard they hard they work, how
much they save and so on.)
The emerging pattern
is extraordinary. As far as I am aware, UKIP’s surge had not been foreseen by
any of the leading political commentators or any member of the party
leaderships. The three ‘main’/old parties (i.e., the Conservatives, Labour and
LibDems) have increasingly converged on a wishy-washy political correctness
which appeals to the A and B groups in the population, particularly – for
example – to teachers, civil servants and many opinion-formers in the media. But
the C and D groups have been upset by the application of political correctness
in practice. This may seem paradoxical, since surely ‘the lower social groups’
ought to be enthusiastic about greater equality of outcomes. That is not how it
has turned out.
The C and D groups
have been the most affected by competition from immigrant workers in the labour
market and by the increasing prominence of Muslim forms of worship. They also
often see at first hand how the welfare state has been corrupted. Instead of
promoting ‘social justice’, the UK’s welfare arrangements frequently offend
against basic principles of ‘natural justice’ by giving too much to the
undeserving. At any rate, UKIP has made large inroads into the votes from the C
and D groups, and it has made these inroads from all of the three ‘main’/old
parties. Some people have noticed that UKIP support does not seem to be closely
connected with EU membership, since it is related to concern about identity and
immigration. However, UKIP supporters are right to see EU integration as a major
force behind the implementation of the political-correctness agenda.
So Cameron’s
‘modernisation’ was meant to persuade the media and its key opinion-formers that
the Conservatives are a party of nice people who are not particularly
Thatcherite. Perhaps it has achieved that. But the result has been to alienate
millions of former and/or potential Conservative voters in the C and D groups,
many of whom have switched to UKIP. The Eastleigh by-election demonstrates that
the planned electoral benefits of the Cameron strategy, in terms of gaining
LibDem votes, are also uncertain. The UK political situation is remarkably fluid
at present. But I don’t see how – with Cameron as prime minister – the
Conservatives can recover support from the C and D groups in the next two years.
Cameron is too obviously a member of an elite that has become remote from the
daily lives of most people.
The majority of
voters say that they care more about health and education than they worry about
the EU. But the Conservatives have nothing particular to offer on health
compared with the other two main parties, while Gove’s radical initiatives in
education are too new for any definite verdict yet. One of Cameron’s blunders
has been to think that emphasis on health and education would be good
salesmanship. In fact, no party has a ‘unique selling point’ in these areas. By
contrast, UKIP has a very strong heart-and-soul USP in its rejection of EU
membership. Voters do see – correctly –
that EU membership is against the UK’s economic interests. The European election
in 2014 and the general election in 2015 will be fascinating political theatre.
My expectation is that
i.
the Conservatives
will do badly, with the loss of votes to UKIP being generally regarded as the
main reason (even though UKIP will in fact also be taking votes from Labour and
the LibDems), and
ii.
the Conservatives
will then split, with a majority of the party adopting withdrawal from the EU as
a main policy, indeed as possibly their distinctive policy, and a rump trying to
differentiate themselves (unavailingly) from Labour and the LibDems.
I have no idea what
will happen after that. It would however be crazy for a Labour government
elected in 2015 to ditch altogether the idea of an In/Out referendum.
Monday, February 25, 2013
Leo McKinstry Is PARTLY Right.
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/379998/Why-voters-must-always-reject-the-Liberal-Democrats
Leo is usually 'on the ball' but his article does rather forget that the Greens are even worse. And seriously - how can you judge either Tories or Labour as 'better'?
I repeat an idea I have written on many occasions.
Ukip is not the panacea for all ills. It is not even a really good political party.
It is distinctly ordinary - but please - compare 'distinctly ordinary' to what the LibLabConGreens each have to offer whether individually or collectively!
Leo is usually 'on the ball' but his article does rather forget that the Greens are even worse. And seriously - how can you judge either Tories or Labour as 'better'?
I repeat an idea I have written on many occasions.
Ukip is not the panacea for all ills. It is not even a really good political party.
It is distinctly ordinary - but please - compare 'distinctly ordinary' to what the LibLabConGreens each have to offer whether individually or collectively!
Cleggygate?
Mr Clegg's 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' tactics in the Lib Dem's 'very own sexual predator' scandal could easily cost the party the Eastleigh by-election.
Did Clegg's original statement add up to mendacity when his later one admitted some knowledge of previous accusations?
The Beeb today spoke of possible 'expenses issues' too with Lord Rennard.
The party's very own Jimmy Savile factor?
Did Clegg's original statement add up to mendacity when his later one admitted some knowledge of previous accusations?
The Beeb today spoke of possible 'expenses issues' too with Lord Rennard.
The party's very own Jimmy Savile factor?
Disgraceful To Dismiss 'Conscience'.
Equality Commission: Civil registrars must conduct same-sex 'marriages'
Find out more > Christian Concern.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Most Interesting.
Mums show support for abortion pill reversal against California lawsuit. (Photo: Unsplash) Over 200 mothers who took treatment to counter...
-
Calls for investigation after monk killed at Ukrainian monastery A law firm representing the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) has said the ...








