Arrest Of Major, Blair, Cameron, Brown & Clegg For Treason.

OPEN LETTER COPIED TO INTERESTED PARTIES

For the Attention of the Chief Constable of Humberside Police

Report of the Crime of Treason Felony under the 1848 Treason Felony Act

20th July 2012

Dear Force Solicitor, Daniel Guiver 8514 and Chief Constable's Staff Officer, Sergeant Andrew Parsons 0982 ,

I wish to again report the crime of Treason, against David Cameron, Nick Clegg, John Major, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Prime Ministers since 1972, and any Whitehall Civil Servants who have been a party to this crime, and made no attempt at reparation.

I ask that you give me a crime number for this report, and forward it to the correct body for action and arrests of the perpetrators.

The Crime under the Treason Felony Act 1848

(for the purposes of this report: where it states 'Sovereign', read 'Sovereign People' and for 'Crown' read 'Head of State or Position as Head of State', and for 'foreigner' any 'foreign body, company or person' and bearing in mind that as Daniel stated 'No parliament may bind it's successors')

"It is Treason Felony to 'compass, imagine, invent, devise, or intend to:

1) Deprive the Sovereign of the Crown.

2) Levy war against the sovereign in order by force or constraint to compel her to change Her measures or counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon, or in order to intimidate or overawe both Houses or either House of Parliament.

3) 'Move or Stir' any foreigner to invade the United Kingdom, or any other country belonging to the Sovereign.

Reason for Report

Part 1

Prime Minister David Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg have made a move to reform the House of Lords, following Tony Blair's damaging attempt to remove Hereditary Peers, who initially were set up as a safety check on any power grab by the House of Commons, and who gave advice to Her Majesty holder of the Crown of England for the sovereign people.

This move falls foul of number (2) above, because it places constraint and intimidation on the Hereditary Lords, who have Letters Patent which are issued under the prerogative powers of the head of state ("royal prerogative"). They constitute a rare, if significant, form of legislation without the consent of the parliament.

I suggest that therefore Parliament have no jurisdiction over this area of the House of Lords, and therefore Tony Blair's House of Lords Act 1999 had no power over this issue.

Likewise the move by the current administration under Cameron and Clegg has no legitimate power to remove the Hereditary Lords and create an elected 'Senate', something which is alien to and possibly damaging to our democratic parliament.

Parliament were therefore acting beyond their authority, by attempting to alter the original, Constitutional arrangements and set-up of our Bi-Cameral Parliament with it's Head of State, each part of which were meant to be a check on each other part, to stop any tyrannical power grab.

Part 2

John Major is guilty of (1) and (3) above, that of "Depriving the Sovereign of the Crown" and " 'Move or Stir' any foreigner to invade the United Kingdom, or any other country belonging to the Sovereign.

When he signed the Maastricht Treaty, he demoted our Sovereign Queen and her subjects to mere citizens of the burgeoning EU, making them subservient to a foreign power, effectively allowing invasion of the United Kingdom by a foreign power residing in Brussels and Strasbourg.

Gordon Brown completed the takeover by signing the Lisbon Treaty without reference to the Sovereign People of the United Kingdom, despite it being in breach of the people's Bill of Rights 1689, under which the Crown swore this oath "And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God."

John Major, Gordon Brown and other Prime ministers since 1972 have breached (2) above "Levy war against the sovereign in order by force or constraint to compel her to change Her measures or counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon, or in order to intimidate or overawe both Houses or either House of Parliament".

At the Queen's Coronation in 1953 she swore this oath to the people and country

"Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen. I solemnly promise so to do."

I put to you that the Queen has been forced and constrained by the actions of her ministers to break this sacred oath of office, and in doing so they have levied war against the Crown and the sovereign people of this country.

Crime committed under Treason Act 1351

1) Compassing the death of the sovereign, or of the sovereign's wife or eldest son and heir.

2) Violating the sovereign's wife, or sovereign's eldest unmarried daughter, or the sovereign's eldest son's wife.

3) Levying war against the sovereign in the realm.

4) Adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid and comfort, in the realm or elsewhere.

5) Killing the King's Chancellor, Treasurer (an office long in commission) or Justices.

As stated above those I accuse of Treason above, have also through their actions under Treason Felony, also committed High Treason under the Treason Act 1351 parts (3) and (4), and the Common Law crime of Misprision of Treason, by not making reparation for the initial wrong of the European Communities Act 1972 committing this country to rule by a foreign power. David Cameron has stated he will not take us out of the damaging EU, confirming his treason.

All of these previous administrations could have taken us out of this foreign takeover by scrapping the European Communities Act 1972 as "no parliament may bind it's successors".

Marcus Tulles Cicero wrote a speech about the enemies within the walls, who he said it is hard to stop, but stop them we must or we are lost as a nation, left to the whim and vagaries of an administration over which we will have no democratic control, and no voice.

All of the accused have damaged the security of this Island nation, by allowing invasion by foreign persons through open borders, and placing key utilities, and public services in foreign and corporate hands, to the detriment of the sovereign people, and further they wish to force privatisation of our police force, which is tantamount to selling the public into slavery, as the "police are the public, and the public are the police" (Sir Robert Peel).

yours sincerely

Mrs Jane Birkby
North Lincolnshire.

I place this rightful demand before readers with no other comment than the fact that the rule of Law will most certainly not be applied.
BUT WHY NOT?
So I ask a further question: Why will there not be arrests and full interrogations of these malefactors? Charges of such gravity should not be merely swept under the carpet.
Perhaps the possibility of 'Citizens' Arrests' may have to be considered at a future time.