Apart from the rather minor point that it dated to the THIRD Century - I have read portions of it and the weakness of the language; the expression; the earthly need 'to explain' - and its lack of all 'guts and power' clearly disqualify it. It does not even possess that 'feel' of Scripture.
I have noticed this absence of substance in The Book Of Mormon and a variety of other religious, charlatan-produced guff.
.jpeg)
.jpeg)