Friday, August 31, 2012

Dishonest.

Absurdly overstated in the first instance. When did a Christian last burn someone at the stake? What relevance has this got for the 21st Century?
'Presenting with arguments'? If that was what was happening few would complain. Their attacks over the last decade are frequently vicious and attack basic human rights.
In any case - he argues that  'Christians have been wrong centuries ago - so they should suffer for that today.'
Would he use this kind of logic in other situations, I wonder?
The overweening arrogance of the new brand of atheists has seldom been better exemplified!

This May Well Not Be A Wrongful Conviction But ...

  ... the problem remains that this case surely did not reach the point of 'beyond reasonable doubt'. The defence subsequently claim...