Intsy wintsy attocopus 'proves' evolution.
Just consider this published [scientific?] statement:
"It seems that Attercopus is a missing link, capable of producing silk but not of weaving it."
So then. This 'ancient, 385 million year old' spider [give or take a month or so] has evolved, wisely planning ahead for a time when, possibly millions of years later, it will be able to use a function which it has not yet got a need for!
These evolution-promoting scientists are the slimy politicians of the scientific world with their twisted arguments, non sequiturs, failures to accept when they are either wrong or illogical and still they unashamedly foist their unprovable rubbish as fact onto the population as a whole.
Little wonder they dare not enter public debate with leading creationist scientists!
"It seems that Attercopus is a missing link, capable of producing silk but not of weaving it."
So then. This 'ancient, 385 million year old' spider [give or take a month or so] has evolved, wisely planning ahead for a time when, possibly millions of years later, it will be able to use a function which it has not yet got a need for!
These evolution-promoting scientists are the slimy politicians of the scientific world with their twisted arguments, non sequiturs, failures to accept when they are either wrong or illogical and still they unashamedly foist their unprovable rubbish as fact onto the population as a whole.
Little wonder they dare not enter public debate with leading creationist scientists!