Why do so many get so ruddy angry when you present an argument which contradicts their thinking? His experience certainly mirrored my own.
There are exceptions, of course, but as a principle it seems that their thinking may not be challenged; debate is out of the question. This cuts across so many of the areas which I write about on here and certainly includes the dyed-in-the-wool evolutionist, atheists and 'warmists'.
I for one, am always prepared to debate in order to get my point across. I know that I cannot win arguments by shouting, waving my hands around, insulting and going purple in the face - why should they?
I may possibly understand if a hindu for example, does not want to debate the merits or otherwise of a deeply held belief system. It may seem kind of blasphemous to do so, I suppose.
Surely this cannot apply in the political field - can it? Are leftwing ideals in fact a kind of sublimated religious belief? - Surely they cannot be the 'very core of being' - can they?
This would explain a great deal. When I see so much absence of logic, so much downright stupidity and so many appalling outcomes defended as if Holy Writ - there has to be some explanation.