Nice One Moses: Well Done Joshua.

I recently watched two programmes in the series Great Battles which featured first Moses and then Joshua. Using military experts and strategists, their battles were analysed in extensive detail, using maps, pictures, text from the Pentateuch and the conclusion was drawn that both of these biblical heroes were outstanding military commanders.

Thanks are in order for all of these 'experts' for showing the very specific accuracy of the Scriptures in battles which had clearly occurred and entirely as reported.

The only problem was their insistence on 'demythologising' - or explaining away all that was miraculous. If one part was evidently so well reported - why make such 'a leap of faithlessness' to assume that the other part was not?