Friday, August 05, 2011

No,Judge, No,Judge. No,Judge, NO!

'A ‘vindictive’ carer who slapped a 95-year-old woman with Alzheimer’s round the head and tormented another 86-year-old sufferer was jailed for nine months yesterday.
Dawn Heaney, 38, attacked Doris Reddaway as she  sat in her wheelchair and forced Philip Plackett to drink tea laced with vinegar and sugar.'
Can we really feel that justice has been done when this poisonous individual will go to prison for around 10 -12 weeks?
Why did the Judge, Philip Head, not stick his neck out and give her five years? - Afraid you'd be criticised? Concerned that it might be reduced on appeal?
MORAL WEAKNESS!
Whenever a feeble punishment is imposed for a heinous crime, it makes a statement that the offence was 'only trivial'.
This WASN'T!
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2022509/Southern-Cross-carer-laced-Alzheimers-sufferers-tea-vinegar-jailed-months-vile-abuse-elderly-patients.html#ixzz1U7nsHlbK

Lest We Forget.

I am not an out and out fan of Margaret Thatcher, she had far too many flaws, was slow to spot the inherent dangers of the EU, did not always grasp simple points obvious to most and alienated some who should have been her 'friends' BUT I must admire her for halting the inexorable march of the hard left.
She never managed to deal with the 'liberal left' which is so troublesome today and so her job was only partly completed. But as Mr Snowden notes at the end of his highly accurate letter below - a certain Soviet leader pointed out that history would judge her positively.
So many people born in the last three decades have not been made aware of what she achieved when our nation was indeed 'the sick man of Europe' - all they have heard is non-stop diatribes of pure bile and naked hatred fom every leftie of every hue whenever her name is mentioned.
Undo leftwing dealings and successes and the anger spews forth in torrents!
Published on Friday 5 August 2011 00:00

From: William Snowden, Butterbowl Gardens, Leeds.

I OFTEN think that if Margaret Thatcher should ever wish to compile a list of calumnious comments levelled against her, then she need do no more than to peruse the letters pages of the Yorkshire Post: a miasma of vituperation, masquerading as considered opinion.
The Left loathe her.
But the Left represents a virulent ideology, whose zenith was the 1970s, decade of destruction.
That was the crucible for the collapse of Britain’s old and ailing industrial base. It gave rise to a tsunami of national debt, hyper-inflation and mass unemployment.
The Left saw industrial strife as a precursor for revolution.
I know. I was there, I witnessed those events.
My academic discipline is modern world history. But throughout the 1970s, I was often reduced to writing papers and marking papers, by candlelight, because of recurring power failures. I was a Liberal. But what I witnessed, particularly during the “Winter of Discontent” (1978-9) changed me.
I saw strikebound railway stations and airports. I saw rat-infested rubbish piled high on the streets of Glasgow. I saw Sunderland shipyards standing idle, their gates bolted and locked and “guarded” by “pickets.” And, in Sheffield, I saw an aggressive, surging mob force out workers from the privately owned Hadfield’s Steel plant (which subsequently went into liquidation). A frightening spectacle.
But the Left met its nemesis in the form of a little lady. Margaret Thatcher did what all those craven men had abjectly failed to do. Through sheer force of will she restored the rule of law and curbed the union bullies by introducing legislation to hold secret ballots et al.
The Left was finally vanquished during the miners’ strike. Arthur Scargill sought to engineer a national strike to precipitate a general strike. He failed. Miner was pitted against miner in a bitter internecine conflict that ruined the industry.
Margaret Thatcher faced the invidious task of reconstructing a blighted nation during a world recession. But she prevailed.
The celebrated, political commentator, Paul Johnson, suggested that she was not so much a Conservative as a “Manchester liberal”. I agree. She embodied the spirit of laissez-faire and free trade between nations.
She possessed the courage to realise her vision of a thriving enterprise economy, and a property and share-owning democracy in which all could participate and prosper. The sluggish utilities were privatised and thereby re-capitalised and re-invigorated.
Margaret Thatcher redistributed “the family silver” among the members of the family! Eight million people became new shareholders.
Political ideologies like the Left are impervious to reason. But, ironically, it was the former Soviet General Secretary, Mikhail Gorbachev, who said that history would judge Margaret Thatcher more fairly than had her contemporaries.
Let us hope so, for no one is more deserving of our abiding gratitude than she.

Must Have Been a Coincidence.

Last Sunday afternoon as my much better half and I were preparing to leave Capetown, all the packing was done and dusted when we discovered that a passport was missing so we checked that it had not been left at hotel reception an hour earlier and concluded that, exceptionally clever pickpockets apart, it had to be in the room.
We tore it apart: moved beds, mattresses, pillows, searched every pocket between us six or eight times. The bags and cases were packed and unpacked about four times.
The time until the arrival of our connection was rapidly bearing down on us, the search had lasted over an hour and panic not too far away consequently, I sat down, cleared my mind and prayed. No more than 40 seconds later and there it was - sitting quietly at the side of a suitcase which had been repeatedly emptied and refilled.
Well, thanks to God for that. If we are Christians then why not ask for more than 'world peace' or a vague 'resolution of world poverty'? Trust Him too for the small things.
To all those 'it-must-be-coincidence' types out there, may I tell you, along with the old Archbishop William Temple: "The more I pray, the more coincidences I see!"

Thursday, August 04, 2011

The Libertarian Alliance.

Although I have distinctly libertian tendencies, one of a number of reasons why I could never be a member of the above group is a piece sent to me by the frequently excellent Director of The Libertarian Alliance, Sean Gabb, which includes: 'For example, there should be no laws against the sale and possession of recreational drugs where only adults are concerned. It is wrong to make a crime of doing with yourself as you please.'
I can agree in one theoretical sense - but this a step too far for me: too rich for my blood!

Brucie Knows What He Is Talking About!

Writing in the Spectator, former Political Editor Bruce Anderson argues that the euro "could have worked but only through an unattainable transformation in human nature".

Universal Suffrage?

The old cry of the Americans who fought against the taxes of George The Third was, "No Taxation Without Representation!" and it is difficult to see how this could possibly be wrong.
I do not necessarily advocate what I write next but do feel that it is an issue worthy of extended debate.
Is the opposite equally true?
Should there be 'representation for those who withhold taxation?'- in other words, from crooked financiers to the feral underclass when they cheat the rest of society, do they - should they - continue to be enfranchised?
Of the latter group, I suspect that very few would vote in any case but is there not a principle at stake?
This has been brought to the fore with the ECHR's insistence that felons and gaolbirds should have the right to keep their vote - I ask whether the parasitic end of the prison population should even be allowed to vote post release.
Labour would never approve of this as they might consider such people as being potential voters for them!
In the end, much as I would personally like to see such a moral system I suspect it could probably never be. It would create an 'industry' - probably controlled by a quango - which would be littered with litigation and paved with bureaucracy.
I repeat however, that the idea warrants democratic debate.

Wednesday, August 03, 2011

How To Solve The Islamic Terror Problem.

It is not for me to promote Islam in any way - and nor do I - but I always attempt to be fair on this Blog. I recently learned something of great interest in Rageh Omar's history of Mohammed on TV.
Mohammed's Last Sermon contradicts EVERYTHING that the Islamic purveyors of terror are doing. They have taken a single verse from the entire Qur'an, 'the so-called 'Sword Verse', and have used it to justify their sickening actions.
As Christians we should love Muslims even though we see them as 'gravely misguided' but if the aforementioned sermon lends no comfort whatsoever to their men of violence - perhaps we should all read it and file it away for future reference.
If these people will not embrace The Saviour for their own spiritual good - then they should be forced to recite every word of that final sermon twenty times a day until they realise what the founder of their religion had actually said - for the good of everyone else!

Darwinistic Thinking Is 'Okay' Or Is It?

Right. So Anders Breivik is a 'practising' darwinian. That apparently, is not worthy of mention in the press BUT had he actually been the 'christian' so many lefties tried to make him into, (avoiding the fact that the genuinely 'born again' do not go on murderous rampages) that could have been 'legitimately' used as a 'stick' with which to beat us evangelicals.
Anybody spot a certain amount of 'doublethink' here?
Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, Hitler - all admirers of Darwin - but Darwinism must NOT be blamed for their excesses? - Huh?
The real difference, of course, is that Christianity does not agree with wholesale butchery - but darwinists accept, in theory at least, a 'dog-eat-dog', soulless universe.
As brutality, rape, bullying and murder are all an integral part of their 'credo' of 'the survival of the fittest' - by extrapolating from this - logically these negatives MUST be 'good' if they are 'good for the species in its development'.
And unless, rather dubiously, you see 'civilisation' as a part of that 'ongoing' process - which again, logic dictates that it cannot really be - murder, rape et al must be evolutionary positives.
Indeed, any civilised society which protects the weak is, by definition, weakening the species. By this logic, only eugenics can lead a society into its 'brave new world'.
Remove the spiritual dimension - and note well the damage which is done by this cosily presented - but essentially raw philosophy.
Force them into a corner and every rabid evolutionary scientist has to admit that 'evolution is not merely morally neutral - but morally empty.'

The BioLogos Foundation.

Well - it certainly 'don't float my boat' but theistic evolutionists may well be most impressed by this rather cheesy attempt at compromise between science and religion.

Cameron Just CANNOT Be Trusted.

'Former Tory Cabinet member John Redwood found at least 4,500 civil servants have been taken on since the election in May last year by Government departments and quangos - three times the number that have been handed compulsory redundancy notices.' (Mail.)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2021729/So-David-Camerons-bonfire-Quangos-election-pledge.html

EU Immigrants.

EU demands that Britain admit immigrants intending to go straight on to benefits! (Telegraph.) 

'The European Commission may finally have hit on an issue that jerks Britain from its euro-torpor – an issue that simultaneously presses the buttons of border control, welfare abuse and Brussels intrusiveness. Whether from hubris, power-hunger or from sheer stupidity, Eurocrats are demanding that Britain stop asking immigrants to show that they won’t immediately start accessing the social security system.' (Dan 'The Man'.)http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100089292/eu-demands-that-britain-admit-immigrants-intending-to-go-straight-on-to-benefits/

The Quick And The Dead.

Gautama Buddha Siddhartha is dead. Mohammed is dead. Zoroaster is dead. Confucious is dead. Guru Nanak Dev is dead. All the deified Roman Emperors are dead. Gandhi is dead.
Jesus The Christ - is alive!

Leeds Council Earns an Award.


Mole-In-The-Know has uncovered the fact that hard-up Leeds council is spending £10,000 a year on a SECOND limo for the Mayor.
 To cash-strapped Leeds Council - a well-earned LoonyTunesWatch Coconut!

Tuesday, August 02, 2011

The Express Is On The Ball - And So Is Its Readership!

The British public should get a referendum on European Union membership, a Daily Express poll confirms today.
'An overwhelming 99 per cent of our readers say the time has come for voters to decide if the UK should be freed from the shackles of Brussels, our exclusive survey reveals.
Asked if Britons should be given a vote on quitting the EU, they answered with a resounding “Yes”.
Support for our petition to force a vote smashed through the 40,000 barrier yesterday.
We have already had a massive response since the e-petition launch on Saturday demanding a referendum on EU membership.'

The Calcedonian Creed.

Even though accepted by Orthodox, Roman and Protestant churches as a valid creed - The Nicene Creed of 126 years earlier is usually considered 'superior' to this, The Calcedonian Creed, from the Council of the same name as agreed in 451 AD.
'We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach people to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body;
consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood;
in all things like unto us, without sin;
begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood;
one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably;
the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten God (μονογενῆ Θεὸν), the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ;
as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us.'

Question.

When it has already been explained at the outset as 'a trap', why, in the story of  'the woman taken in adultery' in John 8 do readers assume that she had indeed committed this offence at all? We only have the word of the tricksters. Is it not far more likely that she forms an integral part of that trap? Was that not her sin, here?
The story has little to do with adultery in any case. It is a test of whether or not Jesus would embrace a Jewish law or bow to Roman authority.
I do not think there is any story in the entire Bible which is quite as badly taught as this one.

Polly Samson.

Polly Samson, mother of the jailed Charlie Gilmour is whingeing because her 'poor baby' is locked up for 23 hours a day in 'a nasty prison'.
Two points, Mrs Gilmour:
1) If you'd brought this toerag up to have more respect - this would not have happened AND
2) He is being PUNISHED for appalling behaviour - something which he clearly deserves.
Now I make no secret of my admiration for the many and varied musical talents of Charlie's stepfather BUT that is utterly irrelevant.
Justice MUST be done - and be blind to boot.
So Mrs G, do us all a favour and SHUT UP!

A Little History.

One often wonders why there is quite so much hatred of the Jews within Islam. Although this is by no means universal, it is certainly widespread and most clearly seen amongs the 'jihadists' who today do not accept the rights of Israel to exist as a nation.
It all goes back to the violent squabbles which were an integral part of life in and around Medina when the increasingly powerful Mohammed arrived there in 622.
A mishmash of Jewish believers - some heretical in the extreme - were scattered around in at least twenty identifiable groups.
In the politics of the day, it was no great surprise that alliances switched and changed resulting in a number of occasions Jewish groups were against Mohammed - and paid a dreadful price for having been so.
Opposition to Mohammed was clearly 'not to be tolerated' and the roots of Islamic hatreds are certainly to be found there.

Headline on Palestine.

Israel: Benjamin Netanyahu 'ready to negotiate borders with Palestine'.   Good!

The Israelis may have lost some of the moral high ground in recent years. Many commentators: resent 'the wall'; do not think that the Israelis should be allowed to defend themselves; have forgotten the numbers of times this legitimate nation has been treacherously attacked and think that it is 'okay' for bombs to be planted and rocket attacks to be lanched against them.
We are no longer accustomed to democratic countries refusing to pander to terror which Israel will not.
Even so, a number of their actions have been provocative, in particular, the allowing of Israeli settlements on land which is clearly 'disputed'.

Jim Devine.

'The former Labour MP for Livingston, who was jailed for sixteen months in March after being branded a liar by his trial judge, was released from Standford Hill Prison in Kent on Monday morning. He spent four months behind bars after submitting false invoices totalling £8,385 between 2008 and 2009 - after politicians' claims had already become front-page news.' Aol.
ONE QUARTER??????!!!!!

Monday, August 01, 2011

Envy.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXFbVe_7Kt4