Wednesday, October 02, 2024

The Only Example Of This? - I Would Hardly Thinks So!

Asian man who posed as far-Right hooligan to stir up racial hatred against Muslims is jailed.Chef posted ‘vile’ messages in 12,000-member Telegram group chat hours before violence erupted in Birmingham.

18 September 2024 6:53pm
Ehsan Hussain
Ehsan Hussain, 25, called for disorder and incited racial violence in the wake of the Southport stabbings West Midlands Police

An Asian man who stirred up racial hatred against Muslims after posing as a far-Right hooligan online during the summer riots has been jailed for more than two years... DT.

Birdie.


 

Judgement.


 

The NHS.

Labour doesn’t dare mention the real curse of the National Health Service.

The Darzi report ought to shock ministers into serious reform. But Wes Streeting stands alone.
FRASER NELSON12 September 2024 • Fraser Nelson
Andy Davey cartoon
CREDIT: Andy Davey
The BBC drama This Is Going To Hurt was intended as a “love letter to the NHS” according to its star, Ben Whishaw. It looked more like a j’accuse. It shows a junior doctor asked to work impossible shifts, making horrific mistakes through sheer exhaustion – and my (immigrant) wife couldn’t understand why it was humour. Doesn’t this happen for real here? Yes it does, I replied. And we find it funny? She was studying for her citizenship test and wanted to understand this part of the British national psyche.
It’s hard to explain. Everyone says that the NHS is broken, but no one dares suggest that the free-at-the-point-of-use principle may be its main curse. The Darzi report is a devastating indictment of the betrayal of the public (and medics) by a visibly falling system. This is a country where one in five deaths are avoidable. Reform is needed, all say: but there the trail of logic runs cold. The idea that we might run our health service like other European countries is the reform that dare not speak its name.
Instead, we hark the traditional British response to NHS woes: more money! “Major” financial support is needed, said the Nuffield Trust. “Getting the health service back on its feet will require sustained investment,” said the Health Foundation. The King’s Fund (a group that lobbies for higher health spending) was specific, calling for “greater investment in primary and community services.” 
The funding is there – Britain’s health service is now one of the best-funded in the world. But the real poverty is one of ideas.
For all the talk of austerity, health spending is up about a third, in real terms, over the last ten years. But when higher-risk heart attack patients call for rapid intervention to unblock an artery, they now wait for 146 minutes, half an hour longer than a decade ago. Lord Darzi, an academic surgeon, made his own visits to NHS facilities. “I was appalled to uncover that mental health patients continue to be accommodated in rooms that were constructed for a Victorian asylum,” he wrote. With “infestations of mice and cockroaches”.
The tragedy is that this dossier of such horror stories could have been written by anyone, at any time. Even the phrase Wes Streeting’s used today – that Britain risks becoming “a health service with a country attached to it” – first appeared in a Spectator editorial from six years ago. 
NHS spending has risen by 19 per cent since then and the hospital workforce is up 17 per cent, and now among the highest levels in the world. But there’s 12 per cent less surgery by each surgeon (hence the waiting list). 
Then, the postcode lottery. England’s NHS is divided into 229 chunks (or trusts) of scandalously varying performance. Turn up to A&E with a suspected stroke in Kent and there’s an 80 per cent chance of being given a brain scan within the hour (as is vital). In Shropshire, it’s 40 per cent. Streeting was right to point out how many problems would be solved if the best of the NHS was rolled out. But such disparities have been true for decades and no one has been able to close the gap. With its 1.5 million workforce, the NHS is just too large for any minister to control. 
The basic principle that everyone should get the healthcare they need regardless of income, is observed in almost every major country in the world (with the famous exception of the United States). But even the most high-taxing and progressive countries ask patients to pay a small amount to see a doctor. This is to deter time-wasting or patients just seeking a free prescription for cheap drugs like paracetamol and aspirin (there are about 45,000 such prescriptions every day). How many GP slots would be freed up if such patients just went to the chemist?
This is what a progressive Labour government ought to be arguing. The rich can skip the system now, via £120-a-visit private GPs. The poor deserve the same service, the same choice. And this could be developed far more easily if those who could afford to pay did so. It would mean that healthcare runs more like a business – with the life-saving efficiencies this means – and more is delivered for the taxpayer’s money. Trying to reform a bureaucracy, no matter how clever the plan, won’t work because there is always such resistance.
When Sajid Javid was health secretary, he was shown a robot in a Liverpool hospital that carried out prostate surgery five times faster than a surgeon (and more safely: hence faster recovery times). Why isn’t it rolled out, he asked? Surgeons don’t like it, came the reply: it was enough of a battle to use the machine in the first place. But what about patients? Why not give them the choice between a one-month wait for proven robotic surgery – or ten months for humans? Allowing co-payments, introducing consumer and patient power, could transform such calculations.
Perhaps Streeting commissioned the Darzi review to shock his own party into dropping their ideological opposition to serious reform. As things stand, he is almost alone. Has has assembled an impressive cadre of advisers – including, controversially, Alan Milburn, a Blair-era health secretary. But it’s the rest of the Cabinet that he needs to worry about. If he was to go over the top, and call for the kind of NHS reforms that would work, who would back him? Would Keir Starmer?
When Milburn was in the trenches, he had plenty of comrades: Charles Clarke, Hazel Blears, John Reid, the old socialists who had been mugged by reality and realised that only market-based reforms would deliver. Now, Streeting stands alone: perhaps why he has ruled out any form of co-payment. It’s hard to see what other kind of reform will work.
Starmer was right to say that taxes cannot rise anymore to feed the NHS. He was right to blame his predecessors. It was the Conservatives who shirked reform, who tested the “money is the answer” theory to destruction. But having so powerfully drawn attention to the problem, it would be a great shame if Labour is prevented by its own ideology from finding a meaningful solution. DT.

Check The Facts!

 

Fact checking abortion.

David Robertson  14 September 2024.

(Photo: Getty/iStock)

The general media seem to have a consensus about the recent presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Firstly, Trump is somewhat economical with the truth and needs to be fact checked; and secondly that Harris's strongpoint is abortion.

From BBC Verify to the ABC moderators, it appears that 'fact checking' is all the rage. So, I thought I would do a little of my own for the benefit of Christian Today readers.

At the beginning of the debate about abortion, Harris said we were going to hear a bunch of lies. She was right – there were many.

1. "There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it is born. This statement was made by one of the moderators. This was a disingenuous 'fact check'. While infanticide is not yet legal in any US state, in some of the states where abortion is allowed at any time, babies who are born alive after a failed abortion can be left to die. Ralph Northam, the former Virginia governor, testified that the infant would be delivered and then left to die. In 2019, Harris herself voted against legislation that would have given protection to babies born alive after failed abortions. Tim Walz, her vice-presidential candidate, signed legislation which gave an unqualified right to abortion up to the moment of birth and removed protections for children born alive after abortion. Of course, this is rare – just as the extreme cases for abortion, like a life-threatening danger to the mother are rare – yet it is permitted and does happen.

2. "Donald Trump will sign a national abortion ban under his Project 2025." He said he was not signing a ban because there was no reason to sign a ban. He explicitly stated, "I am not in favour of an abortion ban." And he denies that Project 2025 is anything to do with him.

3. "Couples who pray and dream of having a family have been denied IVF under Trump's abortion ban." As he pointed out, he was a leader on IVF. Abortion restrictions do not prevent IVF.

4. "Doctors are scared of treating miscarriages in case they are accused of abortion." If that were the case – and there is no evidence it is (where are those ABC fact checkers when we need them?!), then the doctors would be wrong. Miscarriage is entirely different from abortion.

5. "It's insulting to the women of America to suggest that women are asking for an abortion near full term." Harris was answering the question about whether she would support any restrictions on abortion. To be more accurate, she was avoiding the question by stating that this just does not happen. If she was telling the truth then why wouldn't it be insulting to the women of Alaska, Colorado, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon and Vermont that their governments all allow abortion on demand up to full term? Why do they not restrict abortion up to foetal viability, as does her own state of California? Was her vice-presidential pick, Walz, insulting women when he passed a law saying they could have an abortion up to nine months for any reason? And why did the moderators of the debate not fact check her on this?

6. "Abortion is reproductive healthcare." This is a double lie and a masterpiece of Orwellian '1984' style language. "War is Peace", "Lies are Truth", "Love is Hate". Abortion is about preventing reproduction, not enabling it. Its purpose is to stop the birth of a child. In more than 99 per cent of cases this is not about 'healthcare'. A tiny percentage of abortions occur in order to save the life of the mother. That would be healthcare. But taking the life of the baby for economic or social reasons is precisely the opposite of healthcare. Abortion is largely for economic or social care, rather than healthcare.

7. "I will restore the protections of Roe v. Wade." "This is all about reproductive freedom." This is a half lie. There is indeed 'protection' for those who wish to take the life of their own baby. But there is no protection for the baby. Abortion is to reproductive freedom as slavery is to economic freedom.

8. "The freedom to make decisions about your own body should not be made by the government." Given that Harris was a part of the government that mandated vaccinations for all federal employees, she clearly does not believe that the government has no right to tell people what to do with their own bodies. We do not have the right to walk naked down the high street, defecate in public gardens, or to drive drunk on the highway. Government will and should limit us in some areas of our bodily autonomy. Of course, there are questions as to how much they should limit us but the argument for absolute bodily autonomy from a Vice-President who limits bodily autonomy is a hypocritical lie.

9. "The government and Donald Trump especially do not have the right to tell a woman what to do with her body." This argument from bodily autonomy also fails when you recognise that there is more than one body involved. The government limits our bodily autonomy when we are a threat to another human body. Which is why, for example, we ban drink-driving. This is clearly the case in abortion. There is another human body involved. The baby is a human baby – a human life – with its own gender, blood type, heart, body etc. Because abortion is a threat to the life of another human being it is entirely appropriate for the government to seek to preserve that life. In passing, we should note that there is also at least one other body involved – that of the father. He is expected, rightly, to pay for and support his own children. Does he have no say at all in whether his child should be killed in the womb?

10. Let's consider the abandonment of faith or "deeply held belief". If you are a Catholic like President Biden, or indeed another Christian, then when you walk away from the teachings of Jesus Christ, you are abandoning your faith. Your belief is hardly deeply held if you will give it up for political gain or for a Hellish doctrine of autonomy. The devil's great temptation in the beginning was to promise that humans would be like God if we just made our own way. The modern lie of complete autonomy ends up making us more like Satan, the destroyer of life, than God, the giver of Life.

It should not surprise us that Harris's position was full of lies, because it is based on the great lie, coming from the Father of Lies. Sadly, most of our media, politicians and academics take part in this lie and cover up the truth. In 2015, the then California Attorney-General suppressed undercover videos which showed Planned Parenthood abortionists discussing how to dismember a body so that they would not be prosecuted under the partial birth abortion ban and discussing how to distribute body parts. Last week these were finally released, and they are as horrific as they sound. The question is: why would Kamala Harris seek to keep these covered up for nine years and instead prosecute the person who made them?

I recently made a whole podcast on the issue of abortion. It was the most difficult I have ever had to do because it is such a deep, complex and personal subject. Yet the responses indicated just how needed it is for Christians to speak clearly and compassionately into this most divisive of issues. I was contacted by several people who were so thankful that they, or their parents, had resisted the pressure to have an abortion. May God bless America and save it from reverting to a pre-Christian Greco/Roman/Pagan death cult.

David Robertson is the minister of Scots Kirk Presbyterian Church in Newcastle, New South Wales. He blogs at The Wee Flea.

Hudson Taylor.

James Hudson Taylor and the China Inland Mission.

Martyn Whittock  30 September 2024 .

Hudson Taylor in around 1885.Wikimedia Commons

The writer of the Letter to the Hebrews reminds Christians that they are surrounded by a great "cloud of witnesses." (NRSV) That "cloud" has continued to grow in size since then. In this monthly column we will be thinking about some of the people and events, over the past 2000 years, that have helped make up this "cloud." People and events that have helped build the community of the Christian church as it exists today.

Christianity in modern China

In August 2023, the US-based Pew Research Centre published data provided by responses to the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) question: "What is your religious belief?" This revealed that, in 2018, about 2% of Chinese adults (c.20 million people) self-identified as Christians. Of these, Protestants accounted for about 90% (c.18 million adults), while the remainder were mostly Roman Catholics. Other surveys, using slightly different question wording, report similar stats. In the 2018 World Values Survey (WVS), 2% of Chinese adults said they believed in Christianity; in the 2016 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), 3% said this.

In contrast, some media reports and academic papers have suggested that the number of Chinese Christians may be much larger than these surveys suggest. These have included estimates as high as 7% (100 million) or even 9% (130 million) of the total Chinese population, including children. However, it should be noted that, to date, no national surveys measuring formal Christian affiliation come close to these much larger figures.

Nevertheless, the picture may be more complex still. This is shown in the fact that the cumulative share of Chinese adults who say they "believe in" Jesus Christ and/or Tianzhu (the term Chinese Catholics use for God and literally meaning 'Heavenly Lord' or 'Lord of Heaven) is 7% (c.81 million adults), according to the 2018 CFPS survey. It should be noted that such larger figures include those who also believe in one or more non-Christian deities, such as Buddha, 'immortals' (Taoist deities), or have Islamic beliefs. In contrast, in this research, the number of Chinese adults who say they believe in Jesus Christ and/or Tianzhu- and do not believe in other deities – is about 3%. This is closer to the CGSS stats we started with.

All of this reveals how difficult it can be to get an accurate estimate of the number of Christians living in modern China. The matter is made particularly complex because only those churches authorized by the communist government are officially allowed to operate. In reality, many Chinese Christians are members of "underground churches" (dixia jiaohui) or "house churches" (jiating jiaohui). These Christians face restrictions on Christian activities outside of registered venues, the policing of online activities, police raids on 'unregistered' gatherings, difficulties at work and official suspicion of faiths which do not conform to President Xi Jinping's call for the "Sinicization of religions." As a result, large numbers will not appear on any published statistics.

Many of these Christians communities trace their origins – either directly or by influence – to the work of European and US missionaries in the 19th and 20th centuries. This 'foreign' connection lies behind the official view that they fail the test of the campaign for the "Sinicization of religions."

Of the many who worked as missionaries in China in the 19th century, one whose work had a particularly enduring character was James Hudson Taylor, founder of the China Inland Mission (CIM), which was responsible for taking over 800 missionaries to China. In time the CIM grew into one of the largest Christian missionary movements on earth. It became the Overseas Missionary Fellowship in 1964, and today operates as OMF International.

The start of Taylor's faith journey

James Hudson Taylor was born in May 1832, the son of James Taylor – a pharmacist and lay preacher – and his wife, Amelia. They lived in Barnsley (Yorkshire). Taylor seems to have lost his faith for a time during his youth, but by 1849 – just one month after his sister resolved to pray for him daily – he had a change of heart through reading a Christian tract.

He wrote of how his belief was now that: "The promises [of God] were very real, and prayer was a sober matter-of-fact transacting business with God, whether on one's own behalf or on behalf of those for whom one sought his blessing." It was a radical transformation.

Soon after, he resolved that he would travel to China as a missionary. He prepared himself for this new calling by reading books on China; studying the Chinese Gospel of Luke; and also studying medicine in London in 1852. He had not completed these studies before he travelled to China for his first visit. It was the start of an extraordinary relationship with a nation, its people and its culture.

Missionary work in China

Taylor sailed from Britain in September 1853 and disembarked in Shanghai in March 1854. He arrived in a land wracked by the civil war of the Taiping Rebellion (1850–64). It has been estimated that somewhere between twenty and thirty million people died due to this rebellion and related upheavals. Some figures have ranged as high as fifty million deaths. The suffering in China was enormous.

Taylor saw that many Christian missionaries had adopted fairly comfortable lifestyles, and that few went inland to the poorer rural areas of China. Despite the turmoil and danger, Taylor resolved on a different approach to missionary work. He adopted Chinese dress and wore his hair in the manner of the contemporary Chinese. His aim was to overcome social barriers and to make the Christian message more accessible and less 'foreign.' In this he followed the example of the German Lutheran missionary Charles Gutzlaff (died 1851 in British Hong Kong) whom Taylor called the "grandfather of the China Inland Mission," due to his pioneering missionary work, including wearing local dress. The Chinese Evangelization Society, which he formed, was the one which sent Taylor to China. Until 1860 Taylor worked under the authority of the Chinese Evangelization Society in southeast China.

It should be noted that Gutzlaff was a complex and controversial character. Closely connected to European imperialism, he defended the use of force in China by these outside powers; he was accused of gathering intelligence for the British government; critics felt he rushed to baptize converts, who soon fell away from faith; and he was defrauded by (apparent) converts he employed to spread the faith but who inflated numbers of converts and sold the gospel books he sent out with them.

While Gutzlaff was – his critics asserted – too distant from what was actually happening on the ground in China, Taylor travelled extensively, preaching, and also bringing in medical supplies.

Determined to live among the local population he moved to a little house from where he could meet and befriend local Chinese. Moving out of the foreigners' compound brought risks. A cannon ball hit the house and caused him to move back into the foreigners' compound before his house was burned down. He mother kept the cannon ball as a symbol of the protection she believed that God had provided for him.

Despite these risks, Taylor and his co-workers continued preaching and distributing Christian literature and he was determined to be active at the grass-roots level of the missionary work. Over time he mastered several Chinese dialects that he used in his preaching.

In 1858, in Ningbo, Taylor married Maria Dyer, who was his companion in the work until her death in 1870. Although ill health forced Taylor to return to England in 1860, he continued to be very concerned for the Chinese populations who lived in the provinces to which missionaries rarely, if ever, travelled. In 1865 he wrote China's Spiritual Need and Claims and founded the China Inland Mission (CIM). Its goal – as the name indicates – was to work in China far from the port cities. By 1866 the CIM had recruited twenty-two missionaries, including the Taylors. The first party of sixteen, including Hudson and Maria, sailed for China in 1866. The Taylors were accompanied by their four children. Eighteen more missionaries followed in 1870. Soon the mission grew in both numbers and geographical reach. By the end of 1887, 102 new missionaries travelled to China as part of the CIM's activities. In 1888, the first North American party was sent out to China.

In China, Taylor pursued a policy whereby church buildings were built according to Chinese (not foreign) design, and in which the leadership was made up of Chinese Christians.

The work was tough. The Talor's lost a daughter to meningitis in 1867, a baby son to malnutrition in 1870, and Maria died from cholera only a few days later.

After returning again to England, Taylor married a fellow missionary Jane Elizabeth Faulding, and they returned to China in 1872. Taylor spent the rest of his life combining active work in China, with administrative duties and travelling to other countries to publicise the work in China and recruit more missionaries. While out of China he kept close contact with those working there as part of the CIM.

Taylor played a prominent part at the General Conference of the Protestant Missionaries of China, which was convened in Shanghai in 1877 and 1890, and which sought to coordinate activities. He retired from the administration of CIM in 1901. After the death of his second wife in Switzerland, in 1904, Taylor returned to China for the final time and died in Changsha, Hunan, in 1905. He was buried beside his first wife, Maria, in Zhenjiang, in Jiangsu Province, China. The small cemetery, near the Yangtze River, was built over with industrial buildings in the 1960s, during the rapid industrialisation of modern China. In 2013 the land was redeveloped, the industrial buildings were demolished, and it was found that the Taylors' tombs were still there. The graves were excavated with the surrounding soil and then moved to a local church. The original grave marker included these words:

"A MAN IN CHRIST" 2 Cor. XII:2

This monument is erected
 by the missionaries of the China Inland Mission,
 as a mark of their heartfelt esteem and love.

The significance of Taylor and the China Inland Mission. CT.

Could The Teaching On Sexual Immorality Be Any Clearer? 1 Corinthians 5.

5 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that even pagans do not tolerate: A man is sleeping with his father’s wife. 2 And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have gone into mourning and have put out of your fellowship the man who has been doing this? 3 For my part, even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. As one who is present with you in this way, I have already passed judgment in the name of our Lord Jesus on the one who has been doing this. 4 So when you are assembled and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, 5 hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh,[a][b] so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord.

6 Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? 7 Get rid of the old yeast, so that you may be a new unleavened batch—as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. 8 Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

9 I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— 10 not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. 11 But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister[c] but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people.

12 What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13 God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked person from among you.”[d]

Tuesday, October 01, 2024

Buffer Zone Law?

Abortion clinic 'buffer zone' law is discriminatory and 'lacks clarity'

Is This Story In The Mainstream Media? - AND Its Not Just The Leftist Press!

Christian mother sentenced to death in Pakistan for blasphemy.

Christian Daily International-Morning Star News  20 September 2024.

Shagufta Kiran(Photo: Jubilee Campaign)

A Christian mother of four children on Wednesday received the death sentence after a judge convicted her under Pakistan's blasphemy laws, her attorney said.

Shagufta Kiran, 40, was convicted under Section 295-C of Pakistan's widely condemned blasphemy laws for insulting Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, which carries a mandatory death sentence. Attorney Rana Abdul Hameed said Additional Session Judge Islamabad Muhammad Afzal Majoka also sentenced Kiran to a fine of 300,000 rupees ($1,077 USD) after her three-year trial.

She was arrested by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on July 29, 2021, in Islamabad for allegedly sharing blasphemous content in a WhatsApp group in September 2020. Her husband and two sons were also taken into custody during the raid but were later released.

"The complaint against Kiran was registered by a Muslim named Shiraz Ahmed Farooqi, who alleged that she had shared content disrespectful of Islam's prophet," Hameed told Christian Daily International-Morning Star News. "However, Kiran has maintained that she has not authored the content and had forwarded it in the WhatsApp group without reading it."

Formerly a nurse, Kiran had joined several interfaith WhatsApp groups, where she proclaimed the gospel and defended her Christian faith. One such group, Pure Discussions, was administered by the complainant, Farooqi, Muhammad Ameer Faisal of India and Muhammad Jaleel of Canada.

Hameed said Kiran was a brave woman who remained steadfast during the trial.

"I met her after the judge issued the sentence and can confirm that she is very hopeful of a positive outcome from the superior courts," he said. "However, she misses her family a lot and wants to reunite with them as soon as possible."

The attorney said he will file an appeal after the court issues the detailed order. He said the verdict did not come as a surprise as 99 percent of those charged under Section 295-C are convicted by trial courts under pressure from Islamists.

"If you examine all cases of 295-C, the trial courts tend to convict the accused even if the cases against them are very weak," Hameed said. "This is due to the pressure of the religious groups and fears of mob violence. If you analyze all cases of 295-C, you will see that all the convictions of the trial court are overturned by the superior courts."

Nearly 3,000 persons have been accused of blasphemy since 1987, according to the Center for Social Justice (CSJ). The actual scale of abuse of these laws may be three to four times higher, it noted in a report.

It stated that hundreds of accused were incarcerated last year in Pakistan, with 552 detained in prisons in Punjab Province alone. At least 350 persons remained behind bars as of June, according to the report, adding that 103 new persons had been accused of blasphemy this year between January and June.

The report stated that at least seven persons accused of blasphemy have been killed by individuals or mobs across Pakistan since January. A total of 94 people accused of blasphemy were killed in mob attacks between 1994 and 2023.

Pakistan ranked seventh on Open Doors' 2024 World Watch List of the most difficult places to be a Christian, as it was the previous year.

© Christian Daily International - Morning Star News

Birdie.


 

Fear and Anxiety? - Look Up All Of These Verses.

Hypocrisy Alert.

 

Sir Keir Starmer
Sir Keir Starmer speaking to LBC’s Nick Ferrari at Breakfast Matt Crossick/Alamy Live News

KEY MOMENTS

25 September 2024 • 

Sir Keir Starmer suggested he took £20,000 in donations towards accommodation from Labour peer Lord Alli so that his teenage son would not be disturbed while revising for his exams.

The total sum of accommodation included the use of an £18 million penthouse in Covent Garden

The Prime Minister told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “My boy, 16, was in the middle of his GCSEs. I made him a promise, a promise that he would be able to get to his school, do his exams, without being disturbed.

“We have lots of journalists outside our house where we live and I’m not complaining about that, that’s fine. But if you’re a 16-year-old trying to do your GCSEs and it’s your one chance in life... DT.

It MUST Be Done. Do You Have Muslim Friends? Should Christians Really Be Avoiding Them? - What Is The Great Commission All About?

Sharing the Gospel with Muslims is not easy, but it is essential.

Evangelizing Muslims is a notoriously difficult undertaking, particularly since Islam is also a missionary religion. Do not think that every Muslim you meet is out to convert you. But if the conversation runs to the topic of religion, be prepared to get some stiff debate. In its most basic form, Islam is a very rational religion, and it is not easy to counter some arguments on their own ground. Furthermore, most Muslims living in Western countries are trained to know why they do not believe in the Trinity or in Christ as God.

There are four basic points in Muslim apologetics. First, God is one. The Trinity constitutes thinly veiled polytheism, and it is blasphemous to think that God can have a Son. Second, Christ cannot be God. It is contradictory to think that any human being could be God. Third, the Bible is demonstrably full of errors whereas the Qur’an is a direct revelation from God, passed down in its original, pure form. Fourth, instead of holding on to such absurd beliefs, it makes sense to accept the very simple faith of Islam: submit to the one God and keep His commandments.

How should a Christian respond to such argumentation? First, let me emphasize as strongly as I can that Christians need to know the fundamentals of their own faith. The Muslim interpretation of the Trinity explains it as polytheism — Christians worshiping three gods. Christians should be able to respond, at a minimum, that they do not practice polytheism. Christianity is a monotheistic religion; Christians worship one God in three persons — never three gods. Ideally, Christians should be able to go on and explain roughly why this model was chosen to summarize the biblical picture of God, namely precisely in order to preserve belief in the essential unity of God. CP.

Great News.

 ... Yorkshire CCC promoted back into the First Division of The County Championship!

Are 'They' Lying To Us Again?

 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13895447/scientist-ate-bacon-butter-eggs-30-days.html

How To Finish 'The Race'.

 https://www.christiantoday.com/article/rick.warren.lists.10.action.steps.through.the.book.of.acts.to.help.church.leaders.finish.their.race/142215.htm

This Is OUR Money!

  Burnham hands Caribbean £40m after demands to atone for slave trade. PM to pledge support for green energy schemes as he attends Commonwea...