Friday, August 17, 2018

Marx: The Single Most Evil Man Ever To Have Lived?

Karl Marx: The Most Evil Man to Ever Live

in 

Column by Alex R. Knight III.
Exclusive to STR.
He perhaps fancied himself a liberator, though history has since 
more than amply demonstrated the utter moral and intellectual 
bankruptcy of this delusion. From no other philosophical doctrine 
to date has there yet arisen such a surfeit of sophistry, abuse, tyranny, 
oppression, corruption, malice -- and even genocide – as has due to
 the result of Marxism’s implementation. Various adherents to Marx’s
 doctrines, revolutionary poseurs, most of whom reared their hideous
 heads at one point or another during the 20th Century – Joseph Stalin, 
Mao Tse Tung, Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro – were all summarily shown 
up for what they truly were: power-mad impostors.
To be sure, such is the self-contradictory nature of all government, 
no matter the self-proclaimed raison d’etre, whether that be a socialist
 “dictatorship of the proletariat,” or a “defense of democratic freedom,”
 or some such alternate balderdash. But Marx’s theory was that socialist
 revolution, and subsequent overthrow of the bourgeois middle and
 upper classes, would ultimately result -- through the process of dialectical
 materialism -- in a stateless society. This he called Communism.
To the remaining diehard believers, I’d like to ask just when you think
 the Cuban and North Korean states are going to flower into 
social-anarchist models of economic and social equality. Not only is it 
a sick joke to suppose that such governments will ever evolve into even 
this shortsighted morass of inanity, but that anarchism itself will ever 
manifest according to such a model. Since free or freed markets are the
 only ones consistent with the absence of political government, it follows 
that socialism – at least as a universally preferred default system – would
 and could never endure on any large, lasting scale, absent an oppressive 
government bootheel to keep it hobbling along by armed force. Such is 
the case now. And so, we can fully expect, will it ever be in the future. 
Human nature, and human desire, operates along quite different lines.
It is more than instructive to take note of even a percentage of what is 
contained in Marx’s infamous 1848 Manifesto of the Communist Party
Abolition of all private land ownership, and rights of inheritance. 
Government monopolization of all transportation, communications,
 and educational systems. Forced redistribution of population
 (forced assignment of place of residency). A government-monopolized
 central bank. A heavy graduated tax on earnings. As to this last, Marx 
was quoted as saying that such a tax was necessary “to crush the middle 
class under the guise of of a need to finance the government.” In other
 words, Marx was in no way above blatant deception in order to garner 
widespread support for a tax which in truth was designed not simply to
 prevent financial upward mobility among the masses, but to prop up a 
fiat currency creation scheme with which to ensnare and enslave the world.
Marx’s shameless cynicism ran even deeper still: In an 1872 speech in 
Amsterdam, Holland, he proclaimed that, “a social revolution or economic
 conquest could be accomplished by peaceful means in America by taking 
advantage of libertarian traditions and free institutions to subvert them.”
It is easy to see that Marx had little regard for the individual, not only
 from this evident disdain for basic liberty, other than as a convenient 
mechanism through which to vend his poison, but in the fact that 
communistic theory and philosophy held the State as a sovereign and
 all-powerful entity against which no one person would have any 
recourse for grievance. Again, this is an inherent feature of any 
governmental construct, mitigated only by matter of degree. 
In communist ideology, however, there is no question raised – the 
legislative absolutism of the State is sacrosanct.
Yes, true enough, Hitler and his Nazis unleashed their horrors 
upon the world in grand enough fashion, as did Hirohito’s Japanese 
Empire, Mussolini, and countless other dictators and regimes of a
 fascist or other statist bent. But the Third Reich lasted a mere twelve 
and a half years (too long), and one or another junta even less. The ideas 
engendered and championed by Marx, at their peak, lasted over 
75 years – three-quarters of a century from the Bolshevik Revolution 
of 1917 – and enslaved some one-third of the world’s population by the 
early 1980s. Of this percentage of the world’s population, an estimated
 ninety-four million were slaughtered by governments established to 
the ideals of Communism. Today, its oppressive influence is still very 
much felt in not only the aforementioned Cuba and North Korea -- but
 in China, Vietnam, Africa, and other parts of the Third World where 
the flags and slogans of yesteryear may have been sublimated, but the 
core elements of Marxist control remain firmly in place.
In fact, we need look no further than home to see how, due to the 
chimerical promises made by Marx, and bought into by the 
American political Left since the late 
19th Century (though accelerating profoundly from the Great 
Depression 
to the present), this insidious cancer has woven its way into the 
heart of 
a society that once held such promise for so many oppressed 
peoples around the world. One look at the Federal Reserve, the 
IRS, property taxes, public schools, and gun control demonstrate 
the rotten and pestilential fruits of Karl Marx’s highest ambitions.
All philosophies or doctrines that proselytize for any political government 
of any kind are utterly without intellectual or moral merit. This any honest 
libertarian will tell you. To my mind, however, the most egregious of 
these to date have been all of those which have been based – in whole 
or in part – upon the discredited lies and fantastical deceptions of Karl 
Heinrich Marx: the most evil man to ever live. Both the magnitude and 
duration of the impact of this conniving monster’s ideas – thoughts which
 are still, incredibly and without valid excuse, revered in some quarters 
even today -- demand no less of an unapologetic condemnation.
Alex R. Knight III's picture
Columns on STR: 146
Alex R. Knight III is the author of numerous horror, science-fiction, 
and fantasy tales.  He has also written and published poetry, non-fiction
 articles, reviews, and essays for a variety of venues.  He currently lives
 and writes in rural southern Vermont where he holds a B.A. in Literature
 & Writing from Union Institute & University.  Alex's Amazon page can be
 found here, and his work may also be found at both Smashwords and
 Barnes & Noble.  His Facebook page can be found here.  Receive Alex's 
occasional Tweets here.

If Only I Could Disagree.

Nick Timothy Labour sees success and wants to tax it, not encourage more of it. Reeves and her party are takers not makers, destroyers not c...