
Naturally, The Guardian headlines are majoring on the fact that she is a woman and this is one of their twin attacks on the imposition of this well-merited penalty. (In spite of her diabolical cleverness in the organisation of this crime - the other is to lamely claim that 'she has learning difficulties', the relevance of which, if true, I fail to see when she is clearly not mentally retarded in any way.)
No. The point of this article is not really to do with the death penalty - but rather, has much to do with The Grauniad's approach.
The most feminist of all UK newspapers, it ironically takes the line that 'she shouldn't be executed because she is a woman'.
Excuse me but isn't this the perfect proof that feminism has no interest in equality?