Last July, I published an article about Dr Robert Gentry who had come up with ten significant, scientific arguments which show that the so-called Big Bang could not have happened.You may be interested to follow the link below to see how he has not even been allowed to have the views published.
It is now abundantly clear that evolutionary scientists know that their hypothoses do not hold water.
This is why they refuse debate and censor. If they had any confidence whatsoever in their ideas they would be happy to test them in public and would easily destroy those who oppose them.
They do not. They run away and only one conclusion may be drawn from this.
I repeat "In the beginning was nothing which then exploded." Doesn't quite measure up to Genesis 1:1, does it? Even schoolchildren ask me "How can nothing explode?"
I have recently been involved in an utterly futile debate on the topic in one local newspaper.
I at least, have looked at the opposite arguments to my own and reached conclusions.
Several blinkered individuals have effectively declared "We are right, so there - and with knobs on." I have reluctantly withdrawn. Tragically, there are many other areas where people no longer LISTEN to arguments. [University must have changed a great deal since I went in the early 70s.]
They ignore debate and refuse to consider the possibility that they could ever be wrong.
