I do not suppose so many of my readers are too well versed in quantum physics - no more am I - but I was fascinated to read this comment from M. Asher:-
"... in an observed system the observer interacts. That spells the end of science... it pricks the bubble of the whole rationalist myth."
This Blog has on many occasions tried to demonstrate the many failures of theoretical and hypothetical science - particularly when used to further agendas, belief systems and political objectives - as opposed to the certainties and indeed absolutes of operational science.
"Science is rational ergo Christianity is not." simply will not do any longer. It is fundamentally weak as an argument and arrogantly demands to be allowed to win any debate "because it is scientific".
Sorry Dawkins, you will have to think again.
"... in an observed system the observer interacts. That spells the end of science... it pricks the bubble of the whole rationalist myth."
This Blog has on many occasions tried to demonstrate the many failures of theoretical and hypothetical science - particularly when used to further agendas, belief systems and political objectives - as opposed to the certainties and indeed absolutes of operational science.
"Science is rational ergo Christianity is not." simply will not do any longer. It is fundamentally weak as an argument and arrogantly demands to be allowed to win any debate "because it is scientific".
Sorry Dawkins, you will have to think again.
.jpeg)