I am always more than suspicious when geologists suddenly find a 'missing transitional form' which perfectly confirms some evolutionary prejudice. It is always good for a newspaper headline on Page 5 as some sort of 'certainty' which requires no actual proof and which when disproved gets zero coverage. This leaves many readers with the impression that all of these headlines over decades have rather proved the evolutionists' point.One of the more recent examples is Tiktaalik roseae which is hailed by many as being as important as archaeopteryx. Er, yes.
This Blog has already shown how impressive THAT would be!
Yes, Tiktaalik is the link between fish and land vertebrates! Wow.
That is of course until Dr Jonathan Sarfati, the scientific, New Zealander, superstar weighs the evidence rather than the excited claim and pretty much destroys it!
[It is just so cruel. These evolutionary geologists keep getting all thrilled about a new discovery and people like him come along and upset their applecart!]
I can follow the scientific arguments here well enough but am insufficiently qualified to be able to summarise them fairly so, if you want detail - please use the link below.
[It barely resembles anybody in our family.]
